• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
486 Posts 41 Posters 38.6k Views
Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Damn, another 6 after the Munro wicket. A 6 every now and then is relieving the pressure.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    We just didn't get enough wickets early on. If you have batsmen at the crease with this equation you should get home nearly every time.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #27

    @no-quarter said in NZ Cricket:

    We just didn't get enough wickets early on. If you have batsmen at the crease with this equation you should get home nearly every time.

    Yeah, kinda. Hitting on this pitch is really hard - but Hafeez has made it look easy. 17 off the over is the killer. Hitting Sodhi though, on this ground is bloody tough, so well done Pakistan. Good side.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    Ohh tight finish!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    Hafeez gets it done. Not quite good enough, Pakistan are tough to beat in the UAE.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #30

    @no-quarter said in NZ Cricket:

    Hafeez gets it done. Not quite good enough, Pakistan are tough to beat in the UAE.

    they've won 11 on the trot - that's rpetty remarkable

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #31

    @nzzp said in NZ Cricket:

    @no-quarter said in NZ Cricket:

    Hafeez gets it done. Not quite good enough, Pakistan are tough to beat in the UAE.

    they've won 11 on the trot - that's rpetty remarkable

    Especially in T20s where one performance from an opposition player can take the game away from you. Incredible record.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Darren
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    If only Munroe had stayed in longer, or someone else could have really stepped up. So close.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @Darren-Nicholson missing Guppy in that regard, we don't have the depth to fill that hole when he is unavailable. Looking forward to he and Munro going bananas over the summer.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    I don’t think our batting was all that bad, it’s just that we didn’t take wickets and break up the partnerships.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    NZ A drew with Pakistan A in their 1st unofficial test. Astle didn't take a wicket in either innings which doesn't bode well for the real test series.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    And we get swept 3-0.

    To be fair, looking at the XI we put out for this game it is no wonder. A very B team look about it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    wrote on last edited by Kruse
    #37

    Taylor gets his 42nd ODI 50. Not bad.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy Jaffy
    wrote on last edited by Daffy Jaffy
    #38

    Cricinfo text commentary:- That guy 'Bound' was a good bowler in his day. He always tied up an end!
    W

    Boult to Mohammad Hafeez, OUT, Boult, you beauty! In his first match of the tour, he bags a hat-trick. Good length, swings back in just enough at 141ks, catches Hafeez in the crease, hits the front pad on the knee-roll. Pitching in line, impact in line, and hitting leg stump. Hafeez reviews in vain. Boult becomes the third New Zealander after Morrison and Bound to claim a hat-trick in ODIs. After Taylor seemed to publicly question the legality of his bowling action, Hafeez gets trapped for a first-ball duck. Rather subdued celebrations from Boult. He looks skywards and is embraced by his new-ball partner and friend Tim Southee

    Mohammad Hafeez lbw b Boult 0 (1b 0x4 0x6) SR: 0.00

    2.3

    W

    Boult to Babar Azam, OUT, Boult and the wicketkeeper think they have their man! Umpires Raza and Wilson converge and refer it to the TV umpire. Boult nails a wide yorker, Azam hangs back, jabs his bat down. Did the ball bounce before carrying it to Taylor at first slip? Replays suggest that it did not bounce and flew to first slip. Outstanding chest-high grab from Taylor to go with his half-century. Ahoy, two in two for Boult

    Babar Azam c Taylor b Boult 0 (1b 0x4 0x6) SR: 0.00

    2.2

    W

    Boult to Fakhar Zaman, OUT, Boult angles a back-of-a-length ball into the pads of Zaman. He loses his shape, swings to the leg side, does not make contact with the bat. The ball homes in, grazes the pad, and disturbs the stumps. The plan to Fakhar was clear: cramp him for room. Boult has executed it to perfection

    Fakhar Zaman b Boult 1 (5b 0x4 0x6) SR: 20.00

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by Crucial
    #39

    Which was better?

    Bondy: White 45, Symonds 69, Bracken 0 (FOW 6,7,8)
    DK: Dev 17, Ankola 0, Mongia 0 (FOW 6,7,8)
    Boult: Zaman 1, Azam 0, Hafeez 0 (FOW 1,2,3)

    I think Trent may claim this one.

    Edit: Bond does get extra points for dismissing White and Symonds. Especially Symonds.

    MN5M rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    Nice win for NZ finished off with 3 wickets in 4 balls but it was already NZ's Really well controlled bowling effort on the back of boult having them 8-3 in the 3rd and a winning partnership from Latham and Rosco

    Good to see Trent bowling in the 140's.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Pumped them, nice
    Looks like Roscoe has made some enemies. Should be an interesting series

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    All of a sudden NZ has a very different looking team OK not all of a sudden but it is quite marked - only four in this match from 2015 CWC final. Bowling looks OK but too many passengers in the batting line up Timeh at eight really puts some pressure on those above OK if he walks out in the 48th but not if its the 40th

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #43

    Man we ended up with a good score after I heard we lost like 3-4 wickets in the middle for fuck all runs. Great to see Latham and Rosco in the runs. They are a great duo on slower/dead pitches.

    Listened to the last 6-7 overs and a few key wickets made the overall result look more compelling that it probably was. But to get the W after a pants 20/20 series is primo. Hope we build on this and clean sweep the ODI's.

    Boult!! go you good thing! sounded like Ferguson did really well also. Will have to check out highlights later today.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #44

    @crucial said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    Which was better?

    Bondy: White 45, Symonds 69, Bracken 0 (FOW 6,7,8)
    DK: Dev 17, Ankola 0, Mongia 0 (FOW 6,7,8)
    Boult: Zaman 1, Azam 0, Hafeez 0 (FOW 1,2,3)

    I think Trent may claim this one.

    Edit: Bond does get extra points for dismissing White and Symonds. Especially Symonds.

    A hat trick is a fucken incredible achievement but the fact all those guys got one and Paddles never did still speaks volumes.

    Gotta give it to Boult, dismissing the top 3 will decimate and demoralise any batting line up.

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.