• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

CWC Game #7 Black Caps v Pakistan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
188 Posts 31 Posters 8.3k Views
CWC Game #7 Black Caps v Pakistan
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by
    #116

    The Pakistanis did well with a number of yorkers and slower balls in the last few overs. Southee could have replicated that, not sure if Henry can.

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #117

    @akan004 said in CWC Game #7 Black Caps v Pakistan:

    The Pakistanis did well with a number of yorkers and slower balls in the last few overs. Southee could have replicated that, not sure if Henry can.

    I actually like this set up for Henry. I've been critical of him so far this tournament but if Pakistan do come out looking to play the long game (similar to Amla & co) I do like his chances of frustrating or forcing a wicket.

    If he goes at 8s here they can drop him at the airport on the way to Lords'.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #118

    Pitch seemed to have variable speed, turn, could be tough to bat on if we start well

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #119

    Loving those classic seam deliveries from Ferguson.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #120

    Or not.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by
    #121

    71/2 after 16 overs. Another quick wicket or 2 would keep us well in it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    wrote on last edited by
    #122

    They are cruising this unfortunately. We just can't take wickets.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #123

    Should've had a spinner on earlier? Those last two looked dangerous.

    I'm watching a US cricket stream and it's nothing but ads for foreign exchange apps and very dodgy loans/financial services.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    Santner turning it miles. WHERE IS SODHI?!! Are the selectors just there for the piss up?

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #125

    Should they have used slower seamers earlier, to frustrate them based on the pitch?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by
    #126

    Starting to get painful to watch

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by
    #127

    Kane comes in and gets a wicket!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #128

    They're crusing this. Do we have someone who can bowl accurate off-cutters? Our attack seems lacking bin variation at best.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by
    #129

    Give Guppy an over.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #130

    I haven't followed NZ cricket for a while, but one thing that hasn't changed is our love of bad spin bowlers. Santner's test average is 37. He's rubbish.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #131

    Does Santner even have an arm ball?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by Tim
    #132

    There's been no swing, and only seam in the first 10 overs. Really unthreatening bowling attack.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #133

    @Tim yep you can't afford to have such a docile attack when you don't have runs on the board. Hopefully England drop their bundle against India, then it's unlikely to matter to our semi chances

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #134

    Pitch was turning square and the spin bowler got 0-38. I'm absolutely baffled by Santner playing international cricket.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #135

    I've been up since 5 so have seen the last ten overs or so. When i wemt to bed we had just lost Latham so to wake up to a score of 238 and someone other than Williamson getting close to a ton was a pleasant surprise. Pakistan were 120-3, so i was optimistic. But in eyeballing the game situation as things have unfolded since, a few things have come into acute focus.

    The main thing is selection. Blind Freddie can see Munro is a bag of arse holes in this format, and has to go. Today he's contributed significantly to an irrecoverably poor start. Latham is also terribly out of form. Today was made for him but he failed. Another 20-30 runs from the top five and this chase could still look dramatically different. That's not a lot to ask. Guptill has class so will come right, plus they can't all be replaced anyway. Even replacing Latham and Munro is problematic as we only have one spare batsman. More on that later.

    We've badly mid-read the pitch today. I think setting a total was an ok call but we desperately needed an attacking spinner. Sodhi should have played, probably for Henry. We may not strike a pitch like this again but i hope if we do that Stead and Kane can be more flexible with selection.

    So Australia next. Sodhi for Henry if we get another pitch of this ilk but otherwise it's just the batting which needs a rejig. Blundell and Nicholls should come in but this does shorten the order a tad as Blundell is a keeper who can bat as opposed to a batsman who keeps wicket like Latham. We could try him at the top in the dasher role but that's a lot of pressure especially under the conditions in which we'll face the form side in the tournament. But Blundell at five makes the order look a little light. I'm thinking Nicholls for Munro and Blundell to six with Neesham promoted especially given he now has form.

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    0

CWC Game #7 Black Caps v Pakistan
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.