• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

BOP Eruption?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
227 Posts 34 Posters 2.7k Views
BOP Eruption?
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #177

    @Chris-B said in BOP Eruption?:

    This....

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/118198421/whakaariwhite-island-eruption-royal-caribbean-exceedingly-reckless-sending-passengers

    From the article:
    Royal Caribbean has removed the White Island/Whakaari shore excursion page from its website but a cached version shows that it did not include any warnings about potential hazards on what it dubbed "one of the most active volcanoes in the world".

    How much more warning do you require?

    and this.....

    Jim Walker

    Medical Malpractice & Injuries & Overboard Cases | Cruise Law News

    Medical Malpractice & Injuries & Overboard Cases | Cruise Law News

    Cruise ship accidents, injuries, crimes, disappearances, fires, and collisions on the high seas involve issues of maritime law.  Jim Walker graduated from law school in 1983 and has been handling maritime law cases for the past thirty-five years. He handles a wide variety of cases from serious...

    Jim focuses his maritime law practice on representing cruise passengers and crew members in cases against cruise lines such as Carnival, Royal Caribbean, Celebrity, Disney, Holland America Line, Princess and Norwegian Cruise Line among others.

    The firm handles cases on a “contingency” basis – meaning that you do not send us a retainer and we do not bill you for our fees or expenses.

    We advance all costs and are reimbursed for our time and costs only if we are successful in reaching a settlement or we win the case for you.

    Ambulance chasers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    replied to booboo on last edited by JC
    #178

    @booboo said in BOP Eruption?:

    @JC said in BOP Eruption?:

    @booboo said in BOP Eruption?:

    @jegga said in BOP Eruption?:

    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in BOP Eruption?:

    Well after the passing of the euthanasia law maybe it wont be an issue, just get the pilot to say he wants euthanasia ... death by volcano.
    Then if he does make it back he can change his mind.

    Terrible bloody movie

    alt text

    What is this word "versus" ... ?

    Joe verses the Volcano

    Revertere ad ludum, stultus. Plebes commictilis sunt.

    So google translate gives me:

    "Return to the game, stupid. VILE the commons"

    Assuming you're saying "pull your head in dickhead"?

    Ludus / ludum also means school. Plebs / plebes means common people. Commictilis means disgusting.

    So loosely, back to school idiot. Common people disgust me.

    No offence 😉

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to JC on last edited by
    #179

    @JC said in BOP Eruption?:

    @booboo said in BOP Eruption?:

    @JC said in BOP Eruption?:

    @booboo said in BOP Eruption?:

    @jegga said in BOP Eruption?:

    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in BOP Eruption?:

    Well after the passing of the euthanasia law maybe it wont be an issue, just get the pilot to say he wants euthanasia ... death by volcano.
    Then if he does make it back he can change his mind.

    Terrible bloody movie

    alt text

    What is this word "versus" ... ?

    Joe verses the Volcano

    Revertere ad ludum, stultus. Plebes commictilis sunt.

    So google translate gives me:

    "Return to the game, stupid. VILE the commons"

    Assuming you're saying "pull your head in dickhead"?

    Ludus / ludum also means school. Plebs / plebes means common people. Commictilis means disgusting.

    So loosely, back to school idiot. Common people disgust me.

    No offence 😉

    Not sure I took any. Mainly coz I no understand ...

    (You do realise I have a particular hatred for the use of verse/versing and was amused to see the word versus used properly? Just checking)

    JCJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #180

    @booboo said in BOP Eruption?:

    @JC said in BOP Eruption?:

    @booboo said in BOP Eruption?:

    @JC said in BOP Eruption?:

    @booboo said in BOP Eruption?:

    @jegga said in BOP Eruption?:

    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in BOP Eruption?:

    Well after the passing of the euthanasia law maybe it wont be an issue, just get the pilot to say he wants euthanasia ... death by volcano.
    Then if he does make it back he can change his mind.

    Terrible bloody movie

    alt text

    What is this word "versus" ... ?

    Joe verses the Volcano

    Revertere ad ludum, stultus. Plebes commictilis sunt.

    So google translate gives me:

    "Return to the game, stupid. VILE the commons"

    Assuming you're saying "pull your head in dickhead"?

    Ludus / ludum also means school. Plebs / plebes means common people. Commictilis means disgusting.

    So loosely, back to school idiot. Common people disgust me.

    No offence 😉

    Not sure I took any. Mainly coz I no understand ...

    (You do realise I have a particular hatred for the use of verse/versing and was amused to see the word versus used properly? Just checking)

    Yeah I got that @booboo. Latin humour doesn’t travel well, it turns out. Who knew?

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to JC on last edited by
    #181

    @JC us proles don't get your jokes?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #182

    Funny there were people who were interviewed who said they were awesome and kept them informed...others said it was like being in prison...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #183
    Error 404

    .

    The Urey family’s lawyer, Michael Winkleman, will be filing the lawsuit within the next two weeks against White Island Tours and Royal Caribbean cruise line.

    He believes the couple have a compelling case, which he says both operators need to answer to for their actions.

    “It would have been so easy for Royal Caribbean to note: for those of you going on the excursion to White Island Tours there's a heightened risk in going with that because there's a heightened level of this volcanic activity,” Mr Winkleman said.

    “Had they done that, my guess is that most people would have cancelled that tour, so I think there was a profit motive.”

    Furthermore, he believes the operators need to front up in the United States legal jurisdiction - where the couple could potentially be awarded millions of dollars in compensation.

    “I think there is an opportunity to be able to avoid the really draconian or restrictive laws of New Zealand, in an effort in bringing those cases in the United States.”

    .
    Do US courts have jurisdiction in a case against a NZ tour operator about something that happened in NZ?

    taniwharugbyT antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by taniwharugby
    #184

    @Stargazer yeah I was wondering the same thing, and what it could do here, for ACC and other legal liability situations if they somehow win against the NZ Company.

    I'd have thought as it happened in NZ it is subject to NZ Laws, granted the Cruiseliner may be subject to different laws given they operate in multiple jurisdictions, I would also expect the NZ Tour Operator (assuming they only operate inbound stuff) would likely have only had liability coverage for NZ and it's territories, that I believe means if it is tried in the US to US laws, there may be no cover for them or limited cover, plus given the numbers in the US, even if they did have coverage, it probably wouldnt be sufficient for what these people are looking at claiming

    “I think there is an opportunity to be able to avoid the really draconian or restrictive laws of New Zealand, in an effort in bringing those cases in the United States.”

    so people in NZ cant sue for every little thing means our laws are draconian and restrictive?

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #185

    "Gee whizz it was our lucky day. Not only did we escape being steamed like a lobster in a pot of boiling sulphuric acid, now we get to sue those stupid schleps for millions".

    Zero chance of going after the tour company. No point anyway as they'll have no money. The cruise ship is another matter entirely.

    You would have thought the term "active volcano", especially when coupled with the steaming white clouds, was a pretty big clue but … fucking Yank legal system.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #186

    @taniwharugby said in BOP Eruption?:

    granted the Cruiseliner may be subject to different laws given they operate in multiple jurisdictions,

    With airliners it was the country of registration of the aircraft, so probably Panama or somewhere dodgy for a ship. I was advised by an international lawyer to put all of my assets in a trust in case an American had an accident on board when I was captain and decided to sue, (although even the lawyers didn't really know).
    Some pilots used to leave the seat belt sign on permanently for any flight to or from the US. Unexpected turbulence and a passenger hit the roof could leave you at risk. Bloody stupid tort laws.

    As @dogmeat says the Kiwi company won't have any money, and the owners will have protected themselves anyway.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #187

    @Snowy although the Cruiseliner will have Worldwide Liability cover (although probably end up with an out of court settlement partly funded by thier insurers anyway) whereas a NZ Tour Operator is unlikely to have Worldwide cover, anything that includes exposure to the North American market into Liability ratchets up the price

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #188

    Some of the Aussies are looking to sue as well. Their lawyer was saying that was contingent on purchasing the tour tickets in Australia, but had yet to be confirmed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #189

    @Stargazer said in BOP Eruption?:

    Error 404

    .

    The Urey family’s lawyer, Michael Winkleman, will be filing the lawsuit within the next two weeks against White Island Tours and Royal Caribbean cruise line.

    He believes the couple have a compelling case, which he says both operators need to answer to for their actions.

    “It would have been so easy for Royal Caribbean to note: for those of you going on the excursion to White Island Tours there's a heightened risk in going with that because there's a heightened level of this volcanic activity,” Mr Winkleman said.

    “Had they done that, my guess is that most people would have cancelled that tour, so I think there was a profit motive.”

    Furthermore, he believes the operators need to front up in the United States legal jurisdiction - where the couple could potentially be awarded millions of dollars in compensation.

    “I think there is an opportunity to be able to avoid the really draconian or restrictive laws of New Zealand, in an effort in bringing those cases in the United States.”

    .
    Do US courts have jurisdiction in a case against a NZ tour operator about something that happened in NZ?

    No and yes. A US court can make a finding against the NZ company but it's unenforceable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #190

    ACC makes suing difficult, but not impossible. However, because injury is covered, the plaintiff has to sue for negligence, which is a higher bar than just losses due to being unable to work (for example) and medical expenses.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Godder on last edited by
    #191

    @Godder said in BOP Eruption?:

    ACC makes suing difficult, but not impossible. However, because injury is covered, the plaintiff has to sue for negligence, which is a higher bar than just losses due to being unable to work (for example) and medical expenses.

    They might have better luck when they sue the cruise company then

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #192

    and this shit is why insurers are pulling Liability policies from adventure tour operators.

    So the future is, take the risk yourself, and lose everything when an American breaks a nail, or shut up shop.

    Thanks lawyers, you utter fluffybunnies.

    Actually, do we have a thread for whinging about shit like that, because i would like to tee off on banks and the insurance industry.

    V 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #193

    @mariner4life said in BOP Eruption?:

    and this shit is why insurers are pulling Liability policies from adventure tour operators.

    So the future is, take the risk yourself, and lose everything when an American breaks a nail, or shut up shop.

    Thanks lawyers, you utter fluffybunnies.

    Actually, do we have a thread for whinging about shit like that, because i would like to tee off on banks and the insurance industry.

    Yep I wonder how many visitors White Island would get every year if it was a dead dormant lifeless volcano with no activity what so ever?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #194

    Interesting listening to the US lawyer acting on behalf of the American couple, saying he hasnt even looked at the contract agreement between the Cruise Company and White Island tours yet.

    He is very much on the whole NZ's draconian laws too.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #195

    @taniwharugby said in BOP Eruption?:

    NZ's draconian laws too

    I'm not sure that he knows what that means.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #196

    @Snowy said in BOP Eruption?:

    @taniwharugby said in BOP Eruption?:

    NZ's draconian laws too

    I'm not sure that he knows what that means.

    It's almost like we aren't an extra state of the US of A! I can imagine the horror from a lawyers point of view of a country protected against an avalance of frivilous lawsuits.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2

BOP Eruption?
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.