• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Australia v India

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.8k Posts 56 Posters 47.3k Views
Australia v India
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #1691

    @NTA said in Australia v India:

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    So there you go mate, stop being over competitive fluffybunnies and you'll sweep them 2 nil!

    ahem 4-nil. We play real Test match series against India. Not this nuffy 2-game, toss-a-coin crap 😉

    Sure, but we win!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SmudgeS Offline
    SmudgeS Offline
    Smudge
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #1692

    @Donsteppa said in Australia v India:

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #1693

    3EDE3E1E-8F4B-4F04-BC70-17D05EB7C261.jpeg

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #1694

    @Chris-B i think that's the other side of the coin to our "decline", resources.

    Sheffield shield was everything once. Now it's shoehorned in twice in a season. That's becoming obvious when looking for new test talent.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #1695

    @Siam Yeah - poaching of resources has also had an effect on the ABs. The Charles Piatau and Steven Luatua effect.

    And for Oz - it is quite strange that they're having to field people like Wade, Burns and Harris.

    Maybe that's why they've had to prepare pitches that haven't deteriorated as much as they've needed?

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by Siam
    #1696

    @Chris-B said in Australia v India:

    @Siam Yeah - poaching of resources has also had an effect on the ABs. The Charles Piatau and Steven Luatua effect.

    And for Oz - it is quite strange that they're having to field people like Wade, Burns and Harris.

    Maybe that's why they've had to prepare pitches that haven't deteriorated as much as they've needed?

    Very telling that they put so much on the wunderkind after going back to failed players as you mentioned. Khawaja popped up in dispatches too. And yet they blew off investments like Kurtis Patterson ( century maker i think) and Bancroft and Head. The cupboard is as bare as it's ever been. 20/20 side has oodles to pick from though.

    MN5M NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #1697

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @Chris-B said in Australia v India:

    @Siam Yeah - poaching of resources has also had an effect on the ABs. The Charles Piatau and Steven Luatua effect.

    And for Oz - it is quite strange that they're having to field people like Wade, Burns and Harris.

    Maybe that's why they've had to prepare pitches that haven't deteriorated as much as they've needed?

    Very telling that they put so much on the wunderkind after going back to failed players as you mentioned. Khawaja popped up in dispatches too. And yet they blew off investments like Kurtis Patterson ( century maker i think) and Bancroft and Head. The cupboard is as bare as it's ever been. 20/20 side has oodles to pick from though.

    No it’s not. They still get more players in an ANZAC team than we do and some of the teams of the 80s were pretty bad when they had Border and that was about it.

    DonsteppaD SiamS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1698

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @Chris-B said in Australia v India:

    @Siam Yeah - poaching of resources has also had an effect on the ABs. The Charles Piatau and Steven Luatua effect.

    And for Oz - it is quite strange that they're having to field people like Wade, Burns and Harris.

    Maybe that's why they've had to prepare pitches that haven't deteriorated as much as they've needed?

    Very telling that they put so much on the wunderkind after going back to failed players as you mentioned. Khawaja popped up in dispatches too. And yet they blew off investments like Kurtis Patterson ( century maker i think) and Bancroft and Head. The cupboard is as bare as it's ever been. 20/20 side has oodles to pick from though.

    No it’s not. They still get more players in an ANZAC team than we do and some of the teams of the 80s were pretty bad when they had Border and that was about it.

    Even then there was usually a David Boon, Geoff Marsh, or a Craig McDermott floating around alongside Border, and they nabbed the 87 World Cup.

    SiamS MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1699

    @MN5 name and rank the players outside the 11 then.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #1700

    @Donsteppa test cricket?

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #1701

    @Donsteppa said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @Chris-B said in Australia v India:

    @Siam Yeah - poaching of resources has also had an effect on the ABs. The Charles Piatau and Steven Luatua effect.

    And for Oz - it is quite strange that they're having to field people like Wade, Burns and Harris.

    Maybe that's why they've had to prepare pitches that haven't deteriorated as much as they've needed?

    Very telling that they put so much on the wunderkind after going back to failed players as you mentioned. Khawaja popped up in dispatches too. And yet they blew off investments like Kurtis Patterson ( century maker i think) and Bancroft and Head. The cupboard is as bare as it's ever been. 20/20 side has oodles to pick from though.

    No it’s not. They still get more players in an ANZAC team than we do and some of the teams of the 80s were pretty bad when they had Border and that was about it.

    Even then there was usually a David Boon, Geoff Marsh, or a Craig McDermott floating around alongside Border, and they nabbed the 87 World Cup.

    All good players. Not great. Let’s be honest the team that Hadlee routed was pretty shite. They got better in the late 80s, much stronger still in the 90s and became arguably the best test team in history in the 2000s.....

    This current team is still littered with absolute class players.

    DonsteppaD 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #1702

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 name and rank the players outside the 11 then.

    I don’t get what you mean

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to MN5 on last edited by Siam
    #1703

    @MN5 i was saying the playing stocks are low in Aus at the moment regarding test cricket. The ones outside of 3 batsmen and 4 bowlers. You said they're fine and then referenced 40 fucking years ago. I offered up the " cupboard" stock examples but obviously have got it wrong.

    So who are these cricketers that are better than Harris, Wade khawaja, head and burns?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Siam on last edited by Donsteppa
    #1704

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @Donsteppa test cricket?

    My vague memory is that they turned it around with the one day side, then built up to the 89 Ashes series hiding with players like Deano and co alongside Border. Though I did see possibly their worst side being routed at Eden Park in 1986.

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #1705

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    And yet they blew off investments like Kurtis Patterson ( century maker i think) and Bancroft and Head.

    Head was given a few tries and didn't perform adequately under pressure. Therefore the writing is on the wall for players like Wade. Bancroft's Test form didn't recover in England so he's been blacklisted.

    The introduction of genuinely young players like Pucovski and Green is good - would have liked to see more of the former instead of Marcus Harris. The big factor in our opening partnerships: Dave Warner has had 10 different partners at Test level in the opener role. That isn't great, and probably points to Sheffield Shield being below where it needs to be for player prep.

    SiamS KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to NTA on last edited by Siam
    #1706

    @NTA exactly mate. It's not wrist slitting bad, but the less focussed Sheffield shield is having repercussions on red ball talent coming through. That's odd for Australia, but entirely understandable, with revenue models currently at play

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1707

    @MN5 you'd have Harris/Burns, Wade/Head and Starc ahead of those guys at the moment? Let alone Dean Jones, Terry Alderman, or Steve Waugh MK1. And Healy could pass 100...

    Murali also made some good points about Lyon...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #1708

    @Donsteppa said in Australia v India:

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @Donsteppa test cricket?

    My vague memory is that they turned it around with the one day side, then built up to the 89 Ashes series hiding with players like Deano and co alongside Border. Though I did see possibly their worst side being routed at Eden Park in 1986.

    Coincided with a time that Sheffield Shield was huge. There were many names that never or hardly played for Oz but would have walked into any national side: law, Elliott, divenuto, hills, siddons, maher even Lehman off the top of my head. You had to make 1000 runs every season for at least 3 to get a mention. Now, nobody gets 1000.

    But you only need 11 good ones and absolutely no doubt that cricket Oz is addressing this. You don't get to dominate the world for so long by accident🙂.

    When it's all said and done losing 2 series in a row at home to India, the second to India "b" is very unaustralian 😉

    rotatedR Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1709

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    They got better in the late 80s, much stronger still in the 90s and became arguably the best test team in history in the 2000s.....

    While I'm thinking of it, the 90s was the decade they never lost the Ashes 🙂

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to kev on last edited by rotated
    #1710

    @kev said in Australia v India:

    @NTA said in Australia v India:

    @kev said in Australia v India:

    After the Aussie cricketers reverted to type, the world celebrates! Love it.

    Huh? Explain.

    Easy...everyone admires the Australian Cricket team for their skills. But, there is an aggressiveness / need to win that can turn to nasty sledging and recently to cheating. Supposedly they have worked hard on their culture but Tim Paine demonstrated that it is very hard to change and the needless bullshit is still their. When you behave like dicks you can’t complain if no one else likes you - noting that I am sure they don’t worry about that as they are still a great cricket team.

    The thing is ugly win at all costs streak that runs through the side generally only shows itself when it is a high pressure situation against a good team - most often while they are in the process of blowing a big lead. Almost every series Aus has lost in the past four decades has been marred by an ugly incident, this one is no exception.

    So while it's super easy to sing kumbahya in an ODI series against Sri Lanka that doesn't mean anything has changed and to be fair I'm not sure it needs to, it has been a winning formula and the public love it. Who cares what other think?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Australia v India
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.