• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
734 Posts 39 Posters 28.7k Views
Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by Kirwan
    #427

    SpaceX now using StarLink on their droneships. Is a special two way maritime version, which they charge more for. Apparently the fuzzy version on the left was their old maritime internet which was costing $160k per month.

    https://api.starlink.com/public-files/SpaceXNavyStarlink-case-study.pdf
    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by antipodean
    #428

    Better clip:

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #429

    @antipodean hope they didn’t damage the mount.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by nzzp
    #430
    NASA  /  Jul 12, 2022  /  Missions

    NASA’s Webb Delivers Deepest Infrared Image of Universe Yet

    NASA’s Webb Delivers Deepest Infrared Image of Universe Yet

    NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope has produced the deepest and sharpest infrared image of the distant universe to date. Known as Webb’s First Deep Field, this image of galaxy cluster SMACS 0723 is overflowing with detail.

    Ridiculous imagery in a fraction of the time that Hubble managed.

    And this was the ridiculous bit
    Webb’s image covers a patch of sky approximately the size of a grain of sand held at arm’s length by someone on the ground

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #431

    @nzzp said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    NASA  /  Jul 12, 2022  /  Missions

    NASA’s Webb Delivers Deepest Infrared Image of Universe Yet

    NASA’s Webb Delivers Deepest Infrared Image of Universe Yet

    NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope has produced the deepest and sharpest infrared image of the distant universe to date. Known as Webb’s First Deep Field, this image of galaxy cluster SMACS 0723 is overflowing with detail.

    Ridiculous imagery in a fraction of the time that Hubble managed.

    And this was the ridiculous bit
    Webb’s image covers a patch of sky approximately the size of a grain of sand held at arm’s length by someone on the ground

    what the actual fuck!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by Bovidae
    #432

    NASA has also released new images:

    NASA  /  Jul 12, 2022  /  NASA Centers & Facilities

    NASA Reveals Webb Telescope’s First Images of Unseen Universe

    NASA Reveals Webb Telescope’s First Images of Unseen Universe

    Lee esta nota de prensa en español aquí.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #433

    Pfff, we've been seeing planets in a galaxy far, far away since 1977. Too much of Tatooine but still better detail than this.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #434

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #435

    So the SLS - Space Launch System - aka TFBR (The Fuckoff Big Rocket) is going up in about 11 hours.

    Unmanned mission to the Moon and back, which quite frankly is overdue.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #436

    @NTA it's really cool. But SpaceX are showing how expensive this low risk appraoch is. If Starship was allowed to be launched, there would probably be literal tons of gear in orbit by now, and heading off to the moon.

    Reusable rockets have reset space expectations, in a great way.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #437

    @nzzp said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @NTA it's really cool. But SpaceX are showing how expensive this low risk appraoch is. If Starship was allowed to be launched, there would probably be literal tons of gear in orbit by now, and heading off to the moon.

    Reusable rockets have reset space expectations, in a great way.

    A billion a launch for that rocket right? Criminal.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #438

    @Kirwan said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @nzzp said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @NTA it's really cool. But SpaceX are showing how expensive this low risk appraoch is. If Starship was allowed to be launched, there would probably be literal tons of gear in orbit by now, and heading off to the moon.

    Reusable rockets have reset space expectations, in a great way.

    A billion a launch for that rocket right? Criminal.

    political, not criminal, right?
    Fund the right states.
    Avoid failure at all costs (even though that throws time and ironically risk into the programme)

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #439

    @nzzp said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @Kirwan said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @nzzp said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @NTA it's really cool. But SpaceX are showing how expensive this low risk appraoch is. If Starship was allowed to be launched, there would probably be literal tons of gear in orbit by now, and heading off to the moon.

    Reusable rockets have reset space expectations, in a great way.

    A billion a launch for that rocket right? Criminal.

    political, not criminal, right?

    There's a difference?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #440

    Aaaaaaaand launch delayed because engine issue 🙄

    September 3rd now I believe

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #441

    So apparently the issue was one of the fourt engines wasn't cooling to the necessary temperature.

    On investigation, they believe it was a faulty temperature sensor, not actually anything to do with the cooling process. 🤣

    PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #442

    @NTA I hope it wasn't one of those cases where a faulty 50c part halted a multi-million dollar liftoff!! But I'd rather a faulty part than a big engine issue.

    lol what are the chances that sensor actually costs a shit-ton

    M dogmeatD 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Paekakboyz on last edited by
    #443

    @Paekakboyz said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @NTA I hope it wasn't one of those cases where a faulty 50c part halted a multi-million dollar liftoff!! But I'd rather a faulty part than a big engine issue.

    lol what are the chances that sensor actually costs a shit-ton

    Probably cost a couple of bucks but NASA pay thousands 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #444

    Given the Artemis uses an enhanced version of a design first flight certified over four decades ago, and that temperature was the issue behind he integrity of the Challenger's O-rings, I can understand NASA's reticence. It's expensive because of the engineering required to operate in such extremes.

    PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #445

    @antipodean oh shit, yeah no wonder they were erring on the side of caution. What a cool but kinda nightmare fuel job to be working on a gnarly project like this.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to Paekakboyz on last edited by
    #446

    @Paekakboyz I can tell you from personal experience; if the sensor was made by Audi, it'll cost at least two shit-tons 😞

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    4

Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.