SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@mariner4life said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
And Leon is getting an AB gig?
I'm assuming Robertson - who knows what he wants - had a hand in selecting him?
Maybe he just likes yes men around - because Rangi and Holland don't look like guys who'll add much to what Razor can do.
-
@Winger said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
RM easily the better first so far
Not fucking hard, TBF.
-
No Blues to make thr AB 23. Not one. Pea hearted. No brains. No big match temperament.
They are 2nd to everything
-
Why is the Blues pattern of play to use the least imposing tight forwards to carry the ball up? Nepo and Ricci are useless at it. A three legged donkey would be more effective.
-
Ricatelli does a great impression of a beach ball...
-
-
@Canerbry said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Winger understatement of the.
The only thing Beauden has done better so far is kick the ball to Crusaders, only because Richie's been making touch.
He's run more times this quarter than the rest of the season, good to see for abs
-
Sullivan's the only Blue back who looks competent ATM
-
@antipodean said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Why is the Blues pattern of play to use the least imposing tight forwards to carry the ball up? Nepo and Ricci are useless at it. A three legged donkey would be more effective.
It's always been the same under Leon
Sick attack coach.
-
-
Beady's having a shocker.
-
@Nepia said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
The Blues look so disorganised that they're actually going to need to rely on individual brilliance to make a game of this.
So like every other time they've played the crusaders in the last decade?
-
-
@Victor-Meldrew when did he last dominate a game?
-
Better D from the Blues there.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Beady's having a shocker.
No, this is better than average this year
-
