• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Chappell-Hadlee

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
476 Posts 40 Posters 45.9k Views
Chappell-Hadlee
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #439

    @NTA said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    @Damo said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    We are behind now. Aussies slight favourites.

    Can I just stop to point out what a massive load of pants-pissing bullshit this was? 🙂

    Nah. From memory when I typed that you only needed about 35 at a run a ball with 2 set batsmen at the crease and only 7 down. You weren't raging hot favourites, but you were ahead at that point.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #440

    @NTA said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    @Virgil said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    Got em fuck off you tinny fuck

    The tinny fuck who averages 188.0 against New Zealand?

    Oh wait - its only New Zealand...

    Number fucken 3 in ODIs thank you fucken very much..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #441

    @NTA said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    @Damo said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    We are behind now. Aussies slight favourites.

    Can I just stop to point out what a massive load of pants-pissing bullshit this was? 🙂

    It was a superb reverse-jinx made at the perfect time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by Godder
    #442

    I wouldn't want to be picking the Man of the Match award, folks. Ross Taylor came up with a special century and two outstanding slip catches. Trent Boult ran in fast, swung the ball late and kept chipping away at the wickets every time his captain threw him the ball. Who is your pick? For the record, New Zealand have moved above India to No. 3 in the ODI rankings as a result of this win.

    Who is MotM?

    DamoD No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #443

    @Damo said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    Nah. From memory when I typed that you only needed about 35 at a run a ball with 2 set batsmen at the crease and only 7 down. You weren't raging hot favourites, but you were ahead at that point.

    24 minutes ago - so about the 38-39 over mark.

    Maybe Stoinis was still in and that's why you had the brown undies on? 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to Godder on last edited by
    #444

    @Godder said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    [quote]I wouldn't want to be picking the Man of the Match award, folks. Ross Taylor came up with a special century and two outstanding slip catches. Trent Boult ran in fast, swung the ball late and kept chipping away at the wickets every time his captain threw him the ball. Who is your pick? For the record, New Zealand have moved above India to No. 3 in the ODI rankings as a result of this win.[/quote]

    Who is MotM?

    I don't think it's all that close really. Taylor got a good century but it wasn't extraordinary, and unfortunately got out at an inopportune time.

    Boult won us the game when it was on the line.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    wrote on last edited by
    #445

    Boult wins mom

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Godder on last edited by No Quarter
    #446

    @Godder said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    I wouldn't want to be picking the Man of the Match award, folks. Ross Taylor came up with a special century and two outstanding slip catches. Trent Boult ran in fast, swung the ball late and kept chipping away at the wickets every time his captain threw him the ball. Who is your pick? For the record, New Zealand have moved above India to No. 3 in the ODI rankings as a result of this win.

    Who is MotM?

    Rosco's ton was absolutely brilliant and without it we wouldn't have anything to bowl at, but, 6/33 in an ODI is a rarity these days. Crazy figures, so it has to be Boult all day long.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to mimic on last edited by
    #447

    @mimic said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    @Donsteppa said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    Not sure how WASP still has Australia at less than 50/50...

    WASP knows it's stuff

    Except at the start of the innings 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #448

    Apparently that puts us third on the all-time list of most bilateral ODI series won at home - SA 1st with 17, WI 2nd with 9, NZ with 8 and counting.

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #449

    @Godder said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    Apparently that puts us third on the all-time list of most bilateral ODI series won at home - SA 1st with 17, WI 2nd with 9, NZ with 8 and counting.

    Is Australia disadvantaged by the fact that a lot of their series in the past were tri-series rather than bilateral series?

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Godder on last edited by
    #450

    @Godder said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    Apparently that puts us third on the all-time list of most bilateral ODI series won at home - SA 1st with 17, WI 2nd with 9, NZ with 8 and counting.

    What?

    We've probably won 8 bilateral home odi series in last 3 years.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    replied to LABCAT on last edited by
    #451

    @LABCAT said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    @Godder said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    Apparently that puts us third on the all-time list of most bilateral ODI series won at home - SA 1st with 17, WI 2nd with 9, NZ with 8 and counting.

    Is Australia disadvantaged by the fact that a lot of their series in the past were tri-series rather than bilateral series?

    Quite likely given how many they won.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #452

    @Rapido said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    @Godder said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    Apparently that puts us third on the all-time list of most bilateral ODI series won at home - SA 1st with 17, WI 2nd with 9, NZ with 8 and counting.

    What?

    We've probably won 8 bilateral home odi series in last 3 years.

    Yes, our current home streak is 8.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #453

    @No-Quarter said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    ..., but we've got ... the number 1 ODI bowler in the world so we are still in this.

    This 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by booboo
    #454

    @No-Quarter said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    120/4 now, Big Show reviews a caught behind but Snicko shows a faint edge. She's all on.

    Reckon if you look closely there was a hot spot too.

    Yelled in real time based on the noise. Mrs Boo told me off ... 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frye
    replied to Godder on last edited by
    #455

    @Godder said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    @Rapido said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    @Godder said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    Apparently that puts us third on the all-time list of most bilateral ODI series won at home - SA 1st with 17, WI 2nd with 9, NZ with 8 and counting.

    What?

    We've probably won 8 bilateral home odi series in last 3 years.

    Yes, our current home streak is 8.

    So the original stat is in a row. Ok that makes more sense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #456

    Well, that was a bloody good win. Highlighted why ODI games can be so good to wacth - the match swung all over the place.

    Very very impressed with Boult. High quality pace bowling, and has found his pace again. Lockie Ferguson bowling at 152 is just remarkable. That is Bond like pace - bowling coach has to take some credit for that, despite the abuse recently directed at him.

    Santner bowled 8 terrific overs, and then, um, well, yeah. 8-2-19 becomes 10-2-50odd. Just bizarre.

    Great batting from the lower order Australians. Nearly got them over the line.

    Still think we were 50 runs shy of a dominant total, and 20 short of a competitive total. Bowling quality won that for us.

    Otherwise, Aussies show how much they miss Warner and Smith. Take them out adn the lineup looks very very vulnerable.

    Other than that, great day. Bet the crowd got their moneys worth - and good to see plenty of people there.

    In other opinion, isn't this the time to be running the domestic T20 or ODI on TV? Nothing to watch on Friday nights, kids back at school - this is the time to take kids to domestic games, not in the runup to Christmas.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #457

    @nzzp said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    Well, that was a bloody good win. Highlighted why ODI games can be so good to wacth - the match swung all over the place.

    Very very impressed with Boult. High quality pace bowling, and has found his pace again. Lockie Ferguson bowling at 152 is just remarkable. That is Bond like pace - bowling coach has to take some credit for that, despite the abuse recently directed at him.

    Santner bowled 8 terrific overs, and then, um, well, yeah. 8-2-19 becomes 10-2-50odd. Just bizarre.

    Great batting from the lower order Australians. Nearly got them over the line.

    Still think we were 50 runs shy of a dominant total, and 20 short of a competitive total. Bowling quality won that for us.

    Otherwise, Aussies show how much they miss Warner and Smith. Take them out adn the lineup looks very very vulnerable.

    Other than that, great day. Bet the crowd got their moneys worth - and good to see plenty of people there.

    In other opinion, isn't this the time to be running the domestic T20 or ODI on TV? Nothing to watch on Friday nights, kids back at school - this is the time to take kids to domestic games, not in the runup to Christmas.

    Why would you run the tournament when kids are back at school?

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    tubbyj
    wrote on last edited by
    #458

    they are at school before christmas. I agree it actually seems like cricket season now and most people take some holidays in January or Feb, and lazy weekends. I was too busy to watch the 20/20 in the lead up to christmas. They should be targeting Friday and Sat night prime-time late Jan early Feb

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Chappell-Hadlee
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.