• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Build A Waterfront Stadium

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
72 Posts 20 Posters 4.0k Views
Build A Waterfront Stadium
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #21

    @nzzp said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @jegga said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @Chris-B hookers and coke don’t pay for themselves you know.

    @nzzp said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    The margins on development are tiny. I know some developers with money, who can't make projects stack up. Land cost, + council cost +build cost escalation just leaves nothign in it for them. And these guys know what they are doing. It's pretty farking scary when you consider how many houses we need in auckland for the 70,000 new people each year.

    Still, easier to talk about a waterfront stadium eh

    The margins are only tight if you play by the rules , draw out as much coin as you can until you have to declare bankruptcy , leave the subbies carrying the rest of the debt and start up under a new name and you’re sorted .
    If a report can cost almost $1000000 a stadium is going to make Auckland ratepayers feel like Annabelle Chong.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #22

    @taniwharugby said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @nzzp you forgot to tag @Snowy

    Don't fucking start me!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #23

    @jegga said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @nzzp said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @jegga said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @Chris-B hookers and coke don’t pay for themselves you know.

    @nzzp said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    The margins on development are tiny. I know some developers with money, who can't make projects stack up. Land cost, + council cost +build cost escalation just leaves nothign in it for them. And these guys know what they are doing. It's pretty farking scary when you consider how many houses we need in auckland for the 70,000 new people each year.

    Still, easier to talk about a waterfront stadium eh

    If a report can cost almost $1000000 a stadium is going to make Auckland ratepayers feel like Annabelle Chong.

    Or Bevan Chuang even! 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #24

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    Building a port in the firth of Thames would be insane.

    Mt Maunganui?

    Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #25

    @booboo said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    Building a port in the firth of Thames would be insane.

    Mt Maunganui?

    You would basically have the 2 biggest ports in the country right beside each other. Who exactly would pay for the HUGE cost of building a port out of basically nothing. Because the Port of Tauranga would slaughter them and make it a terrible investment.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Personally I have no issues with a working port in the CBD, but I know many do.

    Of the many sites that have been examined the Firth of Thames actually makes the most sense.

    Caveat the other contenders were the Manukau, Kaipara, Marsden Point and Mahurangi.

    Shipping Lines like it because it is actually easier access for them and much easier than crossing a west coast bar.

    The idea is to have a rail link to the existing Wiri container terminal (about 25kms from memory). It is a deeper access than all the other options (including current) except Marsden Point which is one environmental point in its favour but any development will run up against green and iwi concerns I'm sure.

    The cost will be many billions but there is the current port land as an off-set.

    In any scenario Akl retains its cruise ship terminals

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #27

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @booboo said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    Building a port in the firth of Thames would be insane.

    Mt Maunganui?

    You would basically have the 2 biggest ports in the country right beside each other. Who exactly would pay for the HUGE cost of building a port out of basically nothing. Because the Port of Tauranga would slaughter them and make it a terrible investment.

    I meant expand Tauranga and redirect shipping to there, not build a competitor.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #28

    @booboo That ignores the fact that the Ports of Akl and Tga are competitors. Why would Akl gift their business to Tga?

    boobooB Baron Silas GreenbackB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #29

    @dogmeat said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @booboo That ignores the fact that the Ports of Akl and Tga are competitors. Why would Akl gift their business to Tga?

    Wasn't aware of that. Just a thought bubble that I think I may have heard elsewhere.

    Who owns said ports?

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by taniwharugby
    #30

    @dogmeat said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    The idea is to have a rail link to the existing Wiri container terminal (about 25kms from memory). It is a deeper access than all the other options (including current) except Marsden Point which is one environmental point in its favour but any development will run up against green and iwi concerns I'm sure.

    It has/does/will

    Any expansion to MP is almost certainly linked to a rail line to service it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #31

    @dogmeat said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @booboo That ignores the fact that the Ports of Akl and Tga are competitors. Why would Akl gift their business to Tga?

    They will be gifting it anyway if they try and build a port in Thames....

    Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #32

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @dogmeat said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @booboo That ignores the fact that the Ports of Akl and Tga are competitors. Why would Akl gift their business to Tga?

    They will be gifting it anyway if they try and build a port in Thames....

    MP is the obvious location. Thames is an idea for the retarded.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #33

    @baron-silas-greenback Issues with MP is getting the freight south.

    The Northern Line would need squillions spent on it to bring it up to a state where it could handle the freight. There has been a lack of investment over the years plus the infrastructure can't handle the size of carriage needed to move it. So you are talking widening tunnels building new viaducts etc.

    Effectively you would be building a new 130km line as opposed to a 25 km one.

    Then you have the problem of moving all that freight through the Akl isthmus which will put it in conflict with Akl Transports requirements for commuter rail. Of course you could alternatively put hundreds more artics a day onto SH1 but that creates a whole lot of different issues.

    MP sounds great in that there is already a deep sea port there. But its tiny and its remote. I think the analysis shows the Firth option working out cheaper.

    taniwharugbyT Baron Silas GreenbackB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #34

    @dogmeat but Winston said he'd do it!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #35

    @booboo POA is council owned Tga is publically listed

    Baron Silas GreenbackB boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #36
    This post is deleted!
    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by Baron Silas Greenback
    #37

    @dogmeat said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @booboo POA is council owned Tga is publically listed

    True, but not the whole story, a lot of the shares in POT are owned by the regional council via Quayside holdings

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by Hooroo
    #38

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @dogmeat said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @baron-silas-greenback Issues with MP is getting the freight south.

    The Northern Line would need squillions spent on it to bring it up to a state where it could handle the freight. There has been a lack of investment over the years plus the infrastructure can't handle the size of carriage needed to move it. So you are talking widening tunnels building new viaducts etc.

    Effectively you would be building a new 130km line as opposed to a 25 km one.

    Then you have the problem of moving all that freight through the Akl isthmus which will put it in conflict with Akl Transports requirements for commuter rail. Of course you could alternatively put hundreds more artics a day onto SH1 but that creates a whole lot of different issues.

    MP sounds great in that there is already a deep sea port there. But its tiny and its remote. I think the analysis shows the Firth option working out cheaper.

    I think the analysis is full of shite then. Not only do you have to build a rail liks in a few directions,you have to actually build a deep water port into an estuary.... and then all the infrastructure around a port has to be created. Where would you get the marshaling, stevedoring and transport labour .. let alone the supporting industries labour.
    Where is this analysis that claims Firth option working out cheaper? Should be fascinating fiction story to read at bed time.

    The workforce part would be the easy part in my mind (we get people into Kawerau and Tokoroa easily enough) People will move for jobs.

    I don't get the estuary part of your post? Surely they wouldn't look at building and widening the estuary, it would be further north, wouldn't it?

    For future proofing, to me, it would make more sense building there than at the end of a funnel which would be expanding MP. It would link into the inland port at Ruakura more easily if that also goes ahead.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    There's a big difference between Thames and Firth of Thames.

    One is a town at the muddy end of a firth, the other is a large body of water including deepwater sites close to Auckland.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    Yep Firth of Thames site is within the Akl City boundaries and relatively close to Wiri

    This guy has a lot of detail for anyone interested

    https://www.martynevans.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Presentation-copyright1.pdf
    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Build A Waterfront Stadium
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.