• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
443 Posts 47 Posters 8.2k Views
Crusaders v Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #245

    @bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @tim said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @bones Is there a difference between the mauling team driving through and growing to ground naturally (or the ball carrier going to ground), and the mauling team's non-ball-carriers pulling the maul down?

    I reckon there should be, in situations like this one where red took it down to avoid a turnover.

    I think the bigger problem is that the maul not going forward isn't called quickly enough.

    TimT taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #246

    @african-monkey No.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #247

    @anonymous I hate the two-goes at going forward rule too. If you stop going forward why should you get another go?

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #248

    @african-monkey said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @dice Was he ever a good scrummager?

    Thought there was a period there around 2019 where he was coming good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DiceD Offline
    DiceD Offline
    Dice
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #249

    @african-monkey He was a lot better before the injury.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #250

    @african-monkey He had his moments, but not at test level.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #251

    @bones but thats always the case, and the benefit of being the attacking team, you control the maul.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #252

    @anonymous or the maul going backwards is seen as ok.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #253

    @tim said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @anonymous I hate the two-goes at going forward rule too. If you stop going forward why should you get another go?

    You're only supposed to if it stops for less than 5 seconds the first time. I'm not entirely convinced that's how it is officiated in practice.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #254

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @bones but thats always the case, and the benefit of being the attacking team, you control the maul.

    How often do you hear a ref say a team has taken a maul down and not penalise them?

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #255

    The dam has certainly burst...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #256

    So clinical.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #257

    @african-monkey Huge goof to take him instead of Karl T, forcing Ofa T to cover loosehead off the bench. Karl T missed most of Super Rugby with meningitis, but got back into good condition and was in huge form for North Harbour.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by
    #258

    Just realised Stevenson was playing. How come nobody told me?

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #259

    We might still be able to keep them under 50.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    chchfanatic
    wrote on last edited by
    #260

    That was a shit call for the Webber binning. But fuck we are good. So well drilled.

    NepiaN Crazy HorseC 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #261

    @crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Just realised Stevenson was playing. How come nobody told me?

    We were trying to hide him on defence...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #262

    @bones I've heard if often, but is clarifying it was taken down by the attacking team so no penalty?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to chchfanatic on last edited by
    #263

    @chchfanatic said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    That was a shit call for the Webber binning. But fuck we are good. So well drilled.

    You're certainly good at taking your opportunities ... no matter how they're handed to you. 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by
    #264

    To be honest despite the decisions , there is daylight between these 2 teams in terms of most facets .., you could give the chiefs a 20 point head start and would still back the Saders ..

    NepiaN DonsteppaD A 3 Replies Last reply
    5

Crusaders v Chiefs
Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.