• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Rebels v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadersrebels
145 Posts 27 Posters 4.2k Views
Rebels v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #103

    The skill level gap between these teams is enormous.

    T Williams ABs? Wouldn't mind it.

    YeetyaahY BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #104

    Incredible try

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #105

    Matera has been huge in the 2nd spell.

    Nice finish by Williams

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #106

    61:22 - Crusaders throw the ball in. Two of their players move inside the 5m before Whitelock drops it down to them. Is that illegal? Lineout isn't over, after all. Only the hooker could be there I thought?

    antipodeanA DamoD 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #107

    @KiwiMurph said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    The skill level gap between these teams is enormous.

    T Williams ABs? Wouldn't mind it.

    I'd have him over Bower.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #108

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    61:22 - Crusaders throw the ball in. Two of their players move inside the 5m before Whitelock drops it down to them. Is that illegal? Lineout isn't over, after all. Only the hooker could be there I thought?

    Once the ball is thrown you can move.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #109

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    61:22 - Crusaders throw the ball in. Two of their players move inside the 5m before Whitelock drops it down to them. Is that illegal? Lineout isn't over, after all. Only the hooker could be there I thought?

    I looked it up and there's no restrictions on moving into that space once ball is thrown. Cf. the 15m line, which is disallowed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #110

    Matera looks hurt

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to antipodean on last edited by NTA
    #111

    @antipodean said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    61:22 - Crusaders throw the ball in. Two of their players move inside the 5m before Whitelock drops it down to them. Is that illegal? Lineout isn't over, after all. Only the hooker could be there I thought?

    Once the ball is thrown you can move.

    Right - I knew the 15m rule and that the hooker/opponent could be there. The crucial bit is 29d after "any player in the lineout may...".

    *Leave the lineout so as to be in a position to receive the ball, provided they remain within 10 metres of the mark of touch and they keep moving until the lineout is over. *

    If they move in there and AREN'T in a position to receive (i.e. ahead of the ball), then it's a short arm.

    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #112

    Neat to see the return of Todd out there in 20.

    Despite them being mong's fairly often, have enjoyed Merhts and Marshall reunited

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #113

    @KiwiMurph said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    T Williams ABs? Wouldn't mind it.

    Not so keen on his defence there though

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #114

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    @antipodean said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    61:22 - Crusaders throw the ball in. Two of their players move inside the 5m before Whitelock drops it down to them. Is that illegal? Lineout isn't over, after all. Only the hooker could be there I thought?

    Once the ball is thrown you can move.

    Right - I knew the 15m rule and that the hooker/opponent could be there. The crucial bit is 29d after "any player in the lineout may...".

    *Leave the lineout so as to be in a position to receive the ball, provided they remain within 10 metres of the mark of touch and they keep moving until the lineout is over. *

    If they move in there and AREN'T in a position to receive (i.e. ahead of the ball), then it's a short arm.

    That particular requirement (and to keep moving) is more honoured in the breach...

    There is a specific law about the 15m but nothing about the 5m line. Ergo it is fine.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #115

    @Bones especially given the AB defence patterns won't improve him...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Damo on last edited by Bones
    #116

    @Damo said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    @antipodean said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    61:22 - Crusaders throw the ball in. Two of their players move inside the 5m before Whitelock drops it down to them. Is that illegal? Lineout isn't over, after all. Only the hooker could be there I thought?

    Once the ball is thrown you can move.

    Right - I knew the 15m rule and that the hooker/opponent could be there. The crucial bit is 29d after "any player in the lineout may...".

    *Leave the lineout so as to be in a position to receive the ball, provided they remain within 10 metres of the mark of touch and they keep moving until the lineout is over. *

    If they move in there and AREN'T in a position to receive (i.e. ahead of the ball), then it's a short arm.

    That particular requirement (and to keep moving) is more honoured in the breach...

    There is a specific law about the 15m but nothing about the 5m line. Ergo it is fine.

    Fucking lawyers

    Edit: tongue in cheek I hope it's realised. Your law clarifications are gold dust.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #117

    Very much a mixed bag out there from the saders, some sublime stuff with some shit stuff.

    NTAN BonesB N 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #118

    @taniwharugby handling errors. Terrible

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #119

    @taniwharugby said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    Very much a mixed bag out there from the saders, some sublime stuff with some shit stuff.

    Jet lag

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #120

    Matera and Blackadder were Hugh for the Crusaders especially in the 2nd half
    Bower and Jager put in good shifts.Mounga too.

    Gallagher,Newell, and Williams are really developing for a 20 year old and 2- 21 year olds especially as they are tight forwards.
    It will be interesting to see How Havilli and Christie slot back in next week,Jordan of course will be back at FB.

    Fantastic to see Goodhue back for a first real game back in a year I thought he went really well he will only get better and better.

    Drummond was shit.Bridge even though he did some good stuff his lack of pace showed out at FB.If Jordan has played we probably would have finished off a few more tries.

    ACT CrusaderA Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • StagS Offline
    StagS Offline
    Stag
    wrote on last edited by
    #121

    How the hell were the Rebels designated with an away game while playing at home. What sort of muppet does it take to come up with that.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #122

    @Duluth said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    Crusaders tackling at 97%, Rebels 73%

    Somehow it’s only 7-0

    That first half we played like a bunch of over excited school kids - needed to just settle down and trust the process.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Rebels v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
crusadersrebels
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.