• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NZ Cricket

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
802 Posts 60 Posters 46.3k Views
NZ Cricket
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 1kiwi1 Offline
    1kiwi1 Offline
    1kiwi
    replied to Jailbreak7 on last edited by
    #381
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • 1kiwi1 Offline
    1kiwi1 Offline
    1kiwi
    replied to Jailbreak7 on last edited by
    #382
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • 1kiwi1 Offline
    1kiwi1 Offline
    1kiwi
    replied to Jailbreak7 on last edited by
    #383

    @Jailbreak7 said in NZ Cricket:

    Farkin hell, looks like we might be on the right side of the ledger for once!! Finn Allen the key, a huge innings set the bar. Jamieson, Sodhi also bowling well. Question - Why didnt we have this approach in the first two matches?

    Glenn Phillips also chipping in with a handy 69.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #384

    What a way to start the day!

    Started watching just after Phillips and Chapman came together, Phillips took the game away from England and Chapman put the icing on the cake.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #385

    Much better than it looked like at the halfway mark. Seemingly a series of who batted second...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Windows97W Offline
    Windows97W Offline
    Windows97
    wrote on last edited by
    #386

    Except for the 2nd and 3rd games were the team who batted first won πŸ™‚ πŸ™‚

    But excellent to see NZ have some fight and level the series, first NZA and now this!! Those dammed cricketers using up all that sporting luck the AB's will desperately need...

    DonsteppaD MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Windows97 on last edited by
    #387

    @Windows97 said in NZ Cricket:

    Except for the 2nd and 3rd games were the team who batted first won

    This is probably why I'm always the reserve scorer or umpire. Mere details... πŸ˜‚ πŸ™‚

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Windows97 on last edited by
    #388
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy Jaffy
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by Daffy Jaffy
    #389

    @Donsteppa said in NZ Cricket:

    falls off chair in delighted shock

    Hold onto that chair Don, NZ A also won the second 'Test' - by 68 runs.
    NZ- 277 & 299 to Aus- 275 & 233
    Kuggeliejn and O'Rourke with 3 second innings wickets each to clean them up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #390

    NZC should allow Australia to enter 2 teams into the Plunket Shield.

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Rapido on last edited by Donsteppa
    #391

    @Rapido said in NZ Cricket:

    NZC should allow Australia to enter 2 teams into the Plunket Shield.

    Maybe a Boxing Day Test at the Basin by 2040.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #392

    NZ strangling Eng

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #393

    Turned on to see Mitchell go nuts; 464 off rashid. He and Conway centuries, and a dominant partnership that wins us the game. Well done lads

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SBW1
    wrote on last edited by
    #394

    NZ A have performed really well against their Australian counterparts, surely that bodes well for the future.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by Cyclops
    #395

    Mitchell is quite the phenomenon. His first class record was decent but didn't really suggest that he was going to dominate at international level like he has. I never really saw him play before his black caps debut, did anyone see him playing before that and see signs of what was to come?

    While Kane is out injured he has a decent claim to being our best bat. I keep expecting him to turn back into a pumpkin but he just keeps performing.

    canefanC MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    6
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #396

    @Cyclops said in NZ Cricket:

    Mitchell is quite the phenomenon. His first class record was decent but didn't really suggest that he was going to dominate at international level like he has. I never really saw him play before his black caps debut, did anyone see him playing before that and see signs of what was to come?

    While Kane is out injured he has a decent claim to being our best bat. I keep expecting him to turn back into a pumpkin but he just keeps performing.

    And to think he wouldn't have even got a run if Nicholls hadn't got hurt

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by MN5
    #397

    @Cyclops said in NZ Cricket:

    Mitchell is quite the phenomenon. His first class record was decent but didn't really suggest that he was going to dominate at international level like he has. I never really saw him play before his black caps debut, did anyone see him playing before that and see signs of what was to come?

    While Kane is out injured he has a decent claim to being our best bat. I keep expecting him to turn back into a pumpkin but he just keeps performing.

    Either him or Devon Conway who I reckon just oozes class ( although I will concede Johns son early test record is even better )

    With them and KW still going perhaps the glory years haven’t quite gone just yet although both are the wrong side of 30 ( along with our three main seamers )

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #398

    Conway was at least tearing it up domestically. I was hopeful that he would be a top quality test batsman. My expectations of Mitchell were that he'd be a de Grandhomme level player - a reliable lower order bat and useful bowling option.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #399

    @Cyclops said in NZ Cricket:

    Conway was at least tearing it up domestically. I was hopeful that he would be a top quality test batsman. My expectations of Mitchell were that he'd be a de Grandhomme level player - a reliable lower order bat and useful bowling option.

    Is a 50 average so far enough for you ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #400

    That's not mean as a criticism of Conway! My point is more than Conway was selected off the back of an incredible run of domestic form so I wasn't surprised by his success. Whereas Mitchell came in with a domestic record that suggested he'd be a useful contributor but probably not much more. But instead he's blossomed. Those two plus Kane and Latham are essentially the heart of our batting lineup now.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2

NZ Cricket
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.