• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Bledisloe I (All Blacks team room bugged)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksaustralia
970 Posts 100 Posters 158.2k Views
Bledisloe I (All Blacks team room bugged)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • UniteU Offline
    UniteU Offline
    Unite
    wrote on last edited by
    #79

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="kiwiinmelb" data-cid="605801" data-time="1471338662"><p>I still think a Crotty 12 and Fekitoa 13 combo , is about as sound defensively as we can get with everyone available, other options may have offered more in attack though <br><br>
    Was interested to read somewhere in Aussie press that the wallabies will target our midfield believing that to be our weakness in the absence of Nonu Smith</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Well they would be mad if they didn't!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #80

    <p>Crotty + Fekitoa midfield isn't going to lose us the Test.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gollumG Offline
    gollumG Offline
    gollum
    wrote on last edited by
    #81

    <p>I'd still prefer Crotty 13, Fekitoa 12, Fekitoa rushing out of the line is bad at 12, its terrible at 13.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Its worth bearing in mind before panicing that most of us at the start of the year were OK with that pairing till SBW came back. Its entirely possible that was the starting pair the selectors were leaning towards for big games in the RC. And the guys we are pining for are Ngatai who hasn't done shit in a black jersey & Moala who's had one solid game.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Add in the poms bitch slapped Aussie 3-0 with Joseph & Farrell as their centre unit. You can beat Aussie without destroying them in the centres. </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #82

    On assumption Coles and Moody are rested the forward 13 likely to comprise Crockett/Taylor/Franks/Sam/BBBR/Cane/Kaino/Read/Hames/Harris/CharlieF/Savea and one of Squire/PatrickT. Ofa not ready to sub at LH. <br>
    I expect they'll go with Smith/Cruden/Crotty/Fekitoa/Savea/Smith/Dagg to start with TKB/BB/Naholo bench.<br>
    Harsh on TJP but he's really competing with Nugget to start.<br>
    If it were me I'd like to give Sopoaga/Fekitoa/Crotty combo a try but recognise this is unlikely to be the game for that.<br>
    Bus lucky but with GOTJ out too early to blood ALB.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #83

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pakman" data-cid="605827" data-time="1471349030">
    <div>
    <p>On assumption Coles and Moody are rested the forward 13 likely to comprise Crockett/Taylor/Franks/Sam/BBBR/Cane/Kaino/Read/Hames/Harris/CharlieF/Savea and one of Squire/PatrickT. Ofa not ready to sub at LH.<br>
    I expect they'll go with Smith/Cruden/Crotty/Fekitoa/Savea/Smith/Dagg to start with TKB/BB/Naholo bench.<br>
    Harsh on TJP but he's really competing with Nugget to start.<br>
    If it were me I'd like to give Sopoaga/Fekitoa/Crotty combo a try but recognise this is unlikely to be the game for that.<br>
    Bus lucky but with GOTJ out too early to blood ALB.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Why play Savea at 11 when he couldn't get a start for the Canes. Put Naholo at 11 (who also covers 14) Savea shouldn't make the matchday 23 - imo</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Pat T has been great off the bench. Why think he might not even get a guaranteed spot on the reserves bench?  He is a KEY impact player.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Hames adds far less off the bench than Ofa.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Barrett has probably been the best player in Super 16? Why not reward form? It is not as though he is inexperienced. He can always move to 15 later in the game. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>TJP has been better than TKB and is equal defensively.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #84

    <p>If Moala had been fit I think Bus <em>would</em> have missed out. But Naholo/Smith/Dagg no Bus leaves ALB on bench which IMO is too early.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Pat T is massive, but my suspicion is that Squire might appeal owing to his greater mobility. The traditional weakness of Oz tighties would argue for Pat. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>If we wanted to start with our best scrum I'd go for Hames/Harris/Franks. Ofa is great in loose, but if Crockett were to cop an early injury Ofa on bench runs too much risk of AB scrum getting muntered for a long period. Check out Blues/Tahs, and that was Ofa on his favoured TH side!</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I said I <em>expect</em> the above backs. Selectors have consistently indicated they are looking for the best overall performance -- and it <em>appears</em> they believe Cruden/BB is better than BB/Cruden or BB/Sopoaga. In some ways great problem to have?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>At his best TJP is world class. But not sure I'd agree his D matches TKB, who can almost be like a fourth loosie. Again a case of the luxury of choice!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Frank" data-cid="605828" data-time="1471350825">
    <div><br><p> </p>
    <p>Hames adds far less off the bench than Ofa.</p>
    <p> </p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Really?  You must have forgotten the awful two penalty tries conceded when Tu'ungafasi was probably the most guilty part of the Blues scrum that was completely and utterly massacred by the Waratahs earlier this year.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #86

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pakman" data-cid="605838" data-time="1471352043">
    <div>
    <p>1. If Moala had been fit I think Bus <em>would</em> have missed out. But Naholo/Smith/Dagg no Bus leaves ALB on bench which IMO is too early.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>2. I said I <em>expect</em> the above backs. Selectors have consistently indicated they are looking for the best overall performance -- and it <em>appears</em> they believe Cruden/BB is better than BB/Cruden or BB/Sopoaga. In some ways great problem to have?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Some good points, and you might be right about Ofa. I think starting Hames with Crockett as impact is better.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Per the above</p>
    <p>1. Why not leave Bus on the bench and start Naholo at 11 rather than start Savea and put Naholo on the bench?</p>
    <p>2. It appears they believe Cruden-BB is better BEFORE Barrett has had this breakout season. I hope Super form counts for something and that belief has changed.</p>
    <p>Barrett is our best first-five. Why have him on for 20 minutes at the end  and perhaps even at fullback. Why not start him at 10 and then move him to 15 if need be?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    <p>Re: 1 and 2 above, I think the question is one of change up. ABs have been exceptional at bringing bench on at 60 and annihilating opposition with 10 minutes of rugby at a pace their tiring limbs can't live with. Thinking of for example Wales 2014 minutes 68 - 76.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>The Bus strikes me as a slow starter. If BB starts then I can't see Cruden exploding on impact (pardon the expression!) so it would have to be a BB/Sopoaga combo. Which might be extraordinary, but I can't see Shag trying for the first time this weekend?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Starting to look forward to it!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #88

    <p>Serious question - is the team named early tomorrow morning NZ time?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="nzzp" data-cid="605863" data-time="1471375015">
    <div>
    <p>Serious question - is the team named early tomorrow morning NZ time?</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Just before kickoff, between the anthem and the Haka isn't it?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #90

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="kiwiinmelb" data-cid="605801" data-time="1471338662"><p>
    I still think a Crotty 12 and Fekitoa 13 combo , is about as sound defensively as we can get with everyone available, other options may have offered more in attack though <br><br>
    Was interested to read somewhere in Aussie press that the wallabies will target our midfield believing that to be our weakness in the absence of Nonu Smith</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    See. Told ya Cheika's a genius. Genius I tells ya.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by
    #91

    <p>Are the Wallabies still banned from using the term "All Blacks"? Still haven't seen one mention it in an interview or article? Worked well last time.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #92

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Gunner" data-cid="605865" data-time="1471376353"><p>Just before kickoff, between the anthem and the Haka isn't it?</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    I thought it had already been named....<br><br>

    1. Crockett<br>
    2. Taylor<br>
    3. Franks<br>
    4. Romano<br>
    5. Whitelock <br>
    6. Whatshisname<br>
    7. Todd<br>
    8. Read <br>
    9. Youknowhim<br>
    10. Thingo<br>
    11. Bro<br>
    12. Crotty<br>
    13. Cuzzie<br>
    14. Tokenblue<br>
    15. Dagg
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • UniteU Offline
    UniteU Offline
    Unite
    wrote on last edited by
    #93

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="nzzp" data-cid="605863" data-time="1471375015"><p>Serious question - is the team named early tomorrow morning NZ time?</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Yes

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #94

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Gunner" data-cid="605865" data-time="1471376353">
    <div>
    <p>Just before kickoff, between the anthem and the Haka isn't it?</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Depends how many more centres get injured.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • UncoU Offline
    UncoU Offline
    Unco
    wrote on last edited by
    #95

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="ACT Crusader" data-cid="605872" data-time="1471381267">
    <div>
    <p>I thought it had already been named....<br><br>

    1. Crockett<br>
    2. Taylor<br>
    3. Franks<br>
    4. Romano<br>
    5. Whitelock<br>
    6. Whatshisname<br>
    7. Todd<br>
    8. Read<br>
    9. Youknowhim<br>
    10. Thingo<br>
    11. Bro<br>
    12. Crotty<br>
    13. Cuzzie<br>
    14. Tokenblue<br>
    15. Dagg</p>
      </div>
      </blockquote>
      <p> </p>
      <p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/1N0UjV3.jpg" alt="1N0UjV3.jpg"></p>
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Unco" data-cid="605933" data-time="1471395612"><p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/1N0UjV3.jpg" alt="1N0UjV3.jpg"></p></blockquote>
    <br>
    That team is what Hansen really wants to put out, but he fears Winger will call him one eyed and biased.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by
    #97

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="rotated" data-cid="605870" data-time="1471379865">
    <div>
    <p>Are the Wallabies still banned from using the term "All Blacks"? Still haven't seen one mention it in an interview or article? Worked well last time.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>I have it on good authority that the ABs are banned from calling Australia 'The Wallabies' in case complacency sets in.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    wrote on last edited by
    #98

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="605786" data-time="1471332961">
    <div>
    <p>Some Ferners may not see Crotty as a first choice midfielder, but I'm reasonably convinced that he is for the selectors. Hansen said that he sees Crotty as a Conrad Smith type of player; a good communicator, solid on defence and making good decisions. The selectors don't expect Crotty to do the flashy stuff, unlike some of Ferners seem to expect from BOTH midfielders. I think we have only lost our first choice players for one of the midfield positions and, possibly, the midfield cover on the bench.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Conrad could expose defenses with his running though too.  He was a very elusive runner and not so one dimensional.  The reason Crotty does not get much love from the fern is because there is a reason we are hoping for better and think there is better out there with some nurturing.  Heck I ready for BB to play 1st five and Cruden might soon be an after thought and I have no dislike for Cruden.  I just think BB has become the man.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Bledisloe I (All Blacks team room bugged)
Rugby Matches
allblacksaustralia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.