• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
83 Posts 38 Posters 4.4k Views
Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Crucial on last edited by sparky
    #43

    @crucial Crotty has been superb in Super Rugby for a Crusaders team who have won the title two years in a row. Saturday he brought that skill and authority to the AB second five-eight position.

    SBW has looked anything but a champion in his run outs with Blues. Just as poor for the ABs: 0 metres against South Africa, 0 metres against England.

    Bye, bye, Sonny Bill.

    MN5M CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #44

    @sparky said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:

    @crucial Crotty has been superb in Super Rugby for a Crusaders team who have won the title two years in a row. Saturday he brought that skill and authority to the AB second five-eight position.

    SBW has looked anything but a champion in his run outs with Blues. Just as poor for the ABs: 0 metres against South Africa, 0 metres against England.

    Bye, bye, Sonny Bill.

    Whilst the Canterbury bias is slightly ridiculous this post makes a lot of sense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #45

    @sparky said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:

    @crucial Crotty has been superb in Super Rugby for a Crusaders team who have won the title two years in a row. Saturday he brought that skill and authority to the AB second five-eight position.

    SBW has looked anything but a champion in his run outs with Blues. Just as poor for the ABs: 0 metres against South Africa, 0 metres against England.

    Bye, bye, Sonny Bill.

    I note you don't mention Crottys test stats this year. They have been pretty poor. Missed tackles, 2 metres a game etc.
    Just saying that the selectors stuck with him and he produced.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to sparky on last edited by pukunui
    #46

    @sparky said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:

    Big surprise this year is Hansen sticking with SBW when week in, week out, he's the worst performing player in the Black Jersey.

    Really? Week in, week out?
    That's funny because my recollection of this year has been SBW sitting on the sideline injured.
    How many minutes has he actually played to be so poor?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    Interestingly SBW has had some decent games this year but they came when playing outside a 10 that wasn't Beauden Barrett. Blues v Crusaders and ABs v France test 3 spring to mind.

    One positive for SBW is he might have a proper offseason coming up which he hasnt had for a few years.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    So after the last two tests who might we not be seeing in japan 2019 and who are the bolters (we probably don't have bolters now that we have such big squads).

    I am picking G Bridge to have a cracking Super rugby season and to be right in the mix for our best 23.

    SBW to maybe not even make the squad?
    Franks also gone
    Squire to be overtaken by S Barrett for 6

    TJP and TTT to be our half-backs
    Crotty to get another head knock in Super Rugby and retire

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #49

    For what it is worth, my team for the RWC if everyone is fit:

    Moody, Coles, Laulala, Retallick, S Whitelock, S Barrett, Cane/Savea, A Ioane, TTT, B Barrett, R Ioane, Laumape, Goodhue, Bridge, B Smith (c)

    Moli, Taylor, Ofa T, Hemopo, Savea/Papali'i, TJP, Mo'unga, Nonu.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #50

    @sparky said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:

    For what it is worth, my team for the RWC if everyone is fit:

    Moody, Coles, Laulala, Retallick, S Whitelock, S Barrett, Cane/Savea, A Ioane, TTT, B Barrett, R Ioane, Laumape, Goodhue, Bridge, B Smith (c)

    Moli, Taylor, Ofa T, Hemopo, Savea/Papali'i, TJP, Mo'unga, Nonu.

    So many questions. Smith captain over Whitelock? So much inexperience? Two guys better known for tighthead than loosehead on the bench?

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    Assuming all our current lot are fit come RWC naming time, it is likely at 6, back up utility loosie and probably another wing/FB.

    My thinking is someone like Papali'i could force his way into the 32?, similarly Bridge too, but barring injury there isnt likely to be too many changes from the squad that scored 25 points in 2 games v England & Ireland.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Bones on last edited by sparky
    #52

    @bones This game reminded me of Nantes 1986. The end of the road for some. Jack Goodhue in his first year of Test Rugby was the coolest head for the ABs yesterday. Ben Smith is a superb captain for the Highlanders so no concern there.

    Time to blend young hungry talent with some experienced players. Like we did in 1987 and 2011. 2015 is not the only blueprint for success.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #53

    @sparky that captain from the side that won super rugby is pretty handy tough...

    I think we saw the value of experience at loosehead last night, yet you're ditching all those with experience behind Moody?

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #54

    @bones Fair enough. I thought Moli was outstanding for the Barbarians last year, but I doubt he'll be fit.

    Karl Tu'inukuafe will probably be a wiser man next year for the lesson he was taught yesterday by the might Furlong. He can stay as a bench option.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #55

    @sparky Moli is aiming to be ready for SR next year.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    Read gooone is a big call that I can't see them making unless forced to by injury.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    Ireland now the big favourites for the RWC. They beat the All Blacks comfortably with what is still a tough side with the likes of Conor Murray and Robbie Henshaw to come back.

    And don't write off England, Wales or South Africa either. All three have looked excellent in patches in recent test.

    ACT CrusaderA A 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #58

    @sparky said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:

    Ireland now the big favourites for the RWC. They beat the All Blacks comfortably with what is still a tough side with the likes of Conor Murray and Robbie Henshaw to come back.

    And don't write off England, Wales or South Africa either. All three have looked excellent in patches in recent test.

    Thanks Steve.

    I’d actually throw France in the mix. I think the signs are there and with some half decent coaching should improve quite a bit over the next 9 months.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to sparky on last edited by akan004
    #59

    @sparky I wouldn't say they beat us comfortably. We made it easy for them to some extent with our dumb tactics of kicking the ball away, ill discipline and by not capitalising on the chances that we had created. They also had to rely on a moment of brilliance which led to their try but even that was somewhat fortunate. Read actually goes down injured after the lineout had been won by Ireland and it effectively took him out of the defensive line which allowed Stockdale to then make some yards before the chip.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by mofitzy_
    #60

    They were the better team but they didn't beat us comfortably on the scoreboard or most stats - we conceded over twice the penalties but had a better tackle percentage and lineout win rate.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to mofitzy_ on last edited by gt12
    #61

    @mofitzy_

    If we were being super picky, I'd challenge your idea that they didn't win on most stats, and given that you focus on our 88% tackle efficiency to their 87% (which is hardly much of a difference maker at 87.2 vs 87.8) and their lineout percentage of 84% to our 87% (which is all of one line out), I wonder why you think them almost doubling our score isn't significant? Especially, since we didn't score a try?

    How about their run metres, where their 370 odd dwarf our 330ish? Or, clean breaks? Mauls won? Fewer turnovers conceded? Overall possession? Territory? Penalty goals? Tries? Kicks from Hand? Runs?

    Of the approximately 25 stats provided by ESPN, I agree that many were very close, but we led in only offloads, defensive efficiency, line out percentage, and passes. I agree that they didn't beat us comfortably, but I also think that the numbers paint a pretty bleak picture.

    mofitzy_M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #62

    @gt12
    Fair points, though some stats usually correlate more closely to success than others, tackle % and lineout % are usually pretty key. Many of the stats (rucks won/ scrum % ) were identical and others were close. Which is why I don't say they were comfortably better though that might be a semantic argument.

    The inability to score a try in 120+ minutes is the biggest worry for me. When was the last time we went that long?

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.