-
Over 2 million views in 9 hours.
I actually highly recommend watching this. Rogan is terrific at reigning Jones's rants in to actually make some sense, you can tell he is a really good friend. Lots of hilarious moments throughout the whole show, they even had another bloke on who is a flatearther\moon landind denyer..even Jones ain't that crazy.
Very funny the amount of times Jones says something absolutely ludicrous and Rogan's expression is 'What the hell? are you insane?" Only for Jamie to pull it up on the screen to prove Jones correct..actually kinda scary thinking about it.
Really showed Alex's human side, just a bloke whose made some mistakes and is a little nutty getting carried away with all the craziness he reads through every day. Some terrific quotes from both Jones and Rogan in regards to the importance of allowing speech to prevent violence and how crucial communication is to bringing people back together.
-
Jones has been one of the most hilarious radio comms of all-time. Even though he was underground and doing cable-access tv in his 20s, he was smart enough to get cheap airtime on powerful Christian shortwave radio stations and could be heard in NZ on a half-decent receiver in the mid-to-late 90s, before most people had home internet (He is still broadcast on shortwave daily, he’s never given it up.) His three-hour one-year anniversary special of 9/11 (2002) has to go down as one of the most monument rants in broadcast history. He would make cheap videos and send them to radio listeners and implore them to make multiple dubs of those free videos and give tem away for free. It was all about insurgency samizdat fighting an information-war, and he was doing it right at the cusp of the internet age, which crazy-or-not makes him sort of a visionary and IMO an historical figure in broadcasting. I discovered him during the Clinton admin, during the Waco siege and McVeigh/Oklahoma City blowback ops. And if you think he hated Clinton (he does), he hates Bush Jr even more.
-
I watched that part about the Nazis getting tech from aliens. He's either acting or is batshit insane. Everytime Rogan asked him for evidence he seemed confused. The dude with him (Bravo?) is certifiable.
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Your favourite conspiracy theories:
I watched that part about the Nazis getting tech from aliens. He's either acting or is batshit insane. Everytime Rogan asked him for evidence he seemed confused. The dude with him (Bravo?) is certifiable.
Well NASA have denied that they are running a pedophile colony on Mars but thats what they would say wouldn't they?
-
@jegga said in Your favourite conspiracy theories:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Your favourite conspiracy theories:
I watched that part about the Nazis getting tech from aliens. He's either acting or is batshit insane. Everytime Rogan asked him for evidence he seemed confused. The dude with him (Bravo?) is certifiable.
Well NASA have denied that they are running a pedophile colony on Mars but thats what they would say wouldn't they?
The thing is when you look at what Jones is saying there is 'some' logic to it. The US did import Nazi's. There was some obsession with the occult. The US government had planned false flag attacks against US civilians. Experiments with hallucinogen have produces some extremely unusual results. Memories can be transferred through dna. Virtual reality was around in the 60s. Spider thread is being looked at for body armour. 5G has some significant health risks. There have been kind of hybrid animal-human experiments. Late term and post birth abortion has been advocated for.
He's connecting way more dots outside of this madness but you gotta have some sympathy for the guy, his job is to look at this craziness...and when some of it checks out and no one believes you maybe its only a matter of time before the cheese starts to slip off the cracker.
-
@jegga said in Your favourite conspiracy theories:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Your favourite conspiracy theories:
I watched that part about the Nazis getting tech from aliens. He's either acting or is batshit insane. Everytime Rogan asked him for evidence he seemed confused. The dude with him (Bravo?) is certifiable.
Well NASA have denied that they are running a pedophile colony on Mars but thats what they would say wouldn't they?
NASA aka the actual power behind the US according to Jones? Britain also apparently merged with the US in around 1930.
-
Loved the Bravo/Jones interaction taking the piss out of each other for their own crazy theories.
-
@Rembrandt said in Your favourite conspiracy theories:
5G has some significant health risks.
Cite please.
-
@antipodean said in Your favourite conspiracy theories:
@Rembrandt said in Your favourite conspiracy theories:
5G has some significant health risks.
Cite please.
Yeah, I'm curious on that one as well.
(As opposed to 4G/3G/CDMA as a platform)I get that having more idiots reliant on their mobile devices making decisions for them has implications on the stupidity occurrence.
-
To be fair most of it is a fear of the lack of research on the effects of 5G but there is a lot written on it which I had no idea about
-
@Rembrandt said in Your favourite conspiracy theories:
To be fair most of it is a fear of the lack of research on the effects of 5G but there is a lot written on it which I had no idea about
FFS I have only opened the last link in that list and it is so flawed.
The concern is not about 5G but about the potential for increased use of IoT driving more devices around us. The concern about IoT is real and needs further research, but that is a different subject to 5G.
To reiterate the mixed messaging the concerns are over millimetre wave radiation which is NOT the likely frequencies that 5G will operate on.EDIT: the possible link between 5G and millimetre wave radiation is that phone manufacturers are looking at more usage in WiFi protocols and direct short distance communication for things like file transfer or talking to wifi enabled devices.
In short 5G is not the problem, the increased transmission possibilities that come with it are a potential problem.
Further Edit: points above apply to article 1 as well. Article 2 has nothing to do with 5G in particular at all. Article 3 looks to be a mash up of all sorts of misguided googling. Article 4 also seems to confuse the general network frequencies with the very short distance frequencies.
-
@Crucial said in Your favourite conspiracy theories:
@Rembrandt said in Your favourite conspiracy theories:
To be fair most of it is a fear of the lack of research on the effects of 5G but there is a lot written on it which I had no idea about
FFS I have only opened the last link in that list and it is so flawed.
The concern is not about 5G but about the potential for increased use of IoT driving more devices around us. The concern about IoT is real and needs further research, but that is a different subject to 5G.
To reiterate the mixed messaging the concerns are over millimetre wave radiation which is NOT the likely frequencies that 5G will operate on.EDIT: the possible link between 5G and millimetre wave radiation is that phone manufacturers are looking at more usage in WiFi protocols and direct short distance communication for things like file transfer or talking to wifi enabled devices.
In short 5G is not the problem, the increased transmission possibilities that come with it are a potential problem.
Further Edit: points above apply to article 1 as well. Article 2 has nothing to do with 5G in particular at all. Article 3 looks to be a mash up of all sorts of misguided googling. Article 4 also seems to confuse the general network frequencies with the very short distance frequencies.
Woah! Woah! hold the phone..are you saying this guy is wrong?
-
Heard strong rumours from people high up in the pharmaceutical industry that they've, for some years now, been able to kill cancer cells pretty effectively and more efficiently than current drawn out procedures. A bit like ant spray kills ants for the time being, but the ants could come back, to be killed again, to use a clumsy analogy.
Some say that the Israelis are going to release these medications soon.
Now, granted, this is piss weak information but I thought I'd pass it on. Either there's something to it, or, most likely, this post drifts into nonsense obscurity like nearly all of my previous bollocks.... but I post this in anticipation of being sage.
I'm suspicious of the pharma game though because, like the ineffectual drug war, profits seem to trump public service solutions.
-
Heard strong rumours from people high up in the pharmaceutical industry that they've, for some years now, been able to kill cancer cells pretty effectively and more efficiently than current drawn out procedures. A bit like ant spray kills ants for the time being, but the ants could come back, to be killed again, to use a clumsy analogy.
Some say that the Israelis are going to release these medications soon.
Now, granted, this is piss weak information but I thought I'd pass it on. Either there's something to it, or, most likely, this post drifts into nonsense obscurity like nearly all of my previous bollocks.... but I post this in anticipation of being sage.
I'm suspicious of the pharma game though because, like the ineffectual drug war, profits seem to trump public service solutions.
[edit] There's ongoing medical research that can show remarkable benefits but takes forever to get through all the necessary steps to be accepted as fit for use on humans. So just because something shows promise in a petri dish doesn't mean you skip the lengthy and expensive steps to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the drug to have it accepted and regulated for the market.
Also, if you could take a pill and have your cancer cured, it would be worth a fortune. Every drug company on earth is investing billions looking for this magical solution. Why would they do that and then not release it?
-
@antipodean yeah I know, bit of a sad post. The sauces made me wonder....
Correct move to this thread, thanks @taniwharugby
Your favourite conspiracy theories