• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC Final: England v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcenglandspringboks
957 Posts 84 Posters 54.8k Views
RWC Final: England v Springboks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #788

    Funny... All over the news here about the monster South African forwards. Didn't I see a stat flash up to show England pack at 920 vs 900?

    F H 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frye
    replied to Bones on last edited by Frye
    #789

    @Bones said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    Funny... All over the news here about the monster South African forwards. Didn't I see a stat flash up to show England pack at 920 vs 900?

    I don't think the Boks weights are accurate.

    Going by wikipedia weights they say 937kg. Which seems more accurate.

    Also had 6 forwards on the bench.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #790

    @Bones said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    Funny... All over the news here about the monster South African forwards. Didn't I see a stat flash up to show England pack at 920 vs 900?

    New Zealand's pack was heavier than England's too. It's not about size, it's how you use it.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #791

    @hydro11 said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    @Bones said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    Funny... All over the news here about the monster South African forwards. Didn't I see a stat flash up to show England pack at 920 vs 900?

    New Zealand's pack was heavier than England's too. It's not about size, it's how you use it.

    SIX INCHES IS A BIG DEAL OK

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Steven Harris on last edited by
    #792

    @Steven-Harris said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    @cgrant it’s definitely going to put some spice back into the Rugby Championship having South Africa as world champion..

    @Steven-Harris said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    @cgrant it’s definitely going to put some spice back into the Rugby Championship having South Africa as world champion..

    Next game is the 100th versus the Saffas as well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to DMX on last edited by
    #793
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by
    #794

    Funny old game when the Boks lose to us, scrape past the Welsh then make England look like boys in the final.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #795

    Congrats SA, well played!

    Was looking at odds before the game...
    H2H was about $2.50
    1-12 was $3.60
    13+ was about $5

    I went for the only one that wouldn't get a payout last night..haha

    πŸ‘πŸΌ SA welcome to the triple club, very exclusive you know! Thete is a new rule about the triple club, as the newest member, you dont talk about Triple Club!

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BartManB Offline
    BartManB Offline
    BartMan
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #796

    @Victor-Meldrew said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    This from Matt Dawson:

    "I don't know where this has come from. It's come from the gods. Their defensive line, their line speed, their discipline, their energy, has been simply fantastic. England have no answer. An amazing performance from a Springbok team who everybody wrote off."

    Only a disrespectful prick who knows bugger-all about Rugby would ever write the Boks off.

    I have no idea either. I saw England listed as form favourites but I thought S.A. were at LEAST even money. And so it was!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #797

    "Controversy". I didn't detect any but apparently there was.

    Mrs Boo didn't last the match last night so I mention this morning "So the slightly less bad guys won".

    She says (having checked news web sites) "Quite controversial apparently". Seems she had read some comment about "Kiwi TMO" Skeenie and forward passes. I've been hunting for said comments but can't find anything.

    I can only assume it was referring to the Marx pass to Mapimpi that they had a close look at. From behind (which was the angle they seemed to concentrate on) it looked line ball at worst. From side on it goes backwards. Not much controversial in that.

    Did see Stuff.co.nz have a reference to "controversial" in the banner headline that flashed up when I clicked on them, but could find no further reference.

    Has there been much comment on the scrum officiating?

    All looked clean and good to me.

    taniwharugbyT G Chris B.C Victor MeldrewV J 5 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to booboo on last edited by taniwharugby
    #798

    @booboo there will always be some that see controversy...I saw a comment re Garces should never ref again (not in a humorous way given he is retiring)

    Stuff
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    geebee
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #799

    @booboo pass was definitely forward.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to geebee on last edited by
    #800

    @geebee said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    @NTA nah its true,and remind me where you are from and why you are here please?

    Australian. Long time contributor here, and I've had my share of disagreements with these kiwi bastards but I'm not about to spout fuckwit statements like "not world champs to me".

    Wind your neck in, you've got school tomorrow

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    17
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to geebee on last edited by
    #801

    @geebee said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    @booboo pass was definitely forward.

    Wishful thinking.

    Check out the video in the stuff article at 17 seconds.

    Stuff
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #802

    @booboo The camera angle from behind was slightly deceptive, but as soon as you use the lines on the playing field as a guide the pass looks fine - flattish, but certainly not clearly and obviously forward.

    boobooB G 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #803

    @NTA said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    Oh fuck yes this is worth it just to watch Stu Barnes eat crow in the FoxRugby studio

    Barnes still got a swing in at NZ.

    "Means that SA are better than NZ ... "

    NTAN Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #804

    @booboo said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    @NTA said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    Oh fuck yes this is worth it just to watch Stu Barnes eat crow in the FoxRugby studio

    Barnes still got a swing in at NZ.

    "Means that SA are better than NZ ... "

    I turned off once he chewed on the salty camel dick that was congratulating the Boks. Like a bulldog licking piss off a thistle.

    And then I cancelled by KayoSports subscription because there's nothing on πŸ˜‰

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #805

    @booboo

    The BBC had a bit about a forward pass for the first Bokke try being checked but that's about it

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #806

    @Chris-B said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    @booboo The camera angle from behind was slightly deceptive, but as soon as you use the lines on the playing field as a guide the pass looks fine - flattish, but certainly not clearly and obviously forward.

    From side on, to me, it was clearly and obviously backwards. Dunno why they reviewed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #807

    @booboo said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    @NTA said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:

    Oh fuck yes this is worth it just to watch Stu Barnes eat crow in the FoxRugby studio

    Barnes still got a swing in at NZ.

    "Means that SA are better than NZ ... "

    South Africa are better than Boris Johnson! πŸ™‚

    NTAN Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
    1

RWC Final: England v Springboks
Rugby Matches
rwcenglandspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.