Royal drama
-
@donsteppa said in Royal drama:
@nostrildamus said in Royal drama:
They were worried the boy would have dark skin? Not worried he might turn out to be a ginger?
Priorities, people!This has probably been around for ages, but I've seen it in a lot of Facebook comments in the last 24 hours. #TSFgoesfullDaysofOurLives
That’s an oldie but a goody. I shared it on FB years ago and got some hilarious grief from a real pro royalist who claimed there is rangas down the line somewhere and that’s why Harry has the hair that he does. Nothing to do with old what’s his name. ( apparently )
But the Royals will be thrilled they have the chance to have a pop at Harry and Megan and distract the world from the fact they have a Paedo in their midst.
-
@mn5 said in Royal drama:
@donsteppa said in Royal drama:
@nostrildamus said in Royal drama:
They were worried the boy would have dark skin? Not worried he might turn out to be a ginger?
Priorities, people!This has probably been around for ages, but I've seen it in a lot of Facebook comments in the last 24 hours. #TSFgoesfullDaysofOurLives
That’s an oldie but a goody. I shared it on FB years ago and got some hilarious grief from a real pro royalist who claimed there is rangas down the line somewhere and that’s why Harry has the hair that he does. Nothing to do with old what’s his name. ( apparently )
But the Royals will be thrilled they have the chance to have a pop at Harry and Megan and distract the world from the fact they have a Paedo in their midst.
Don't you go marginalising sexual abusers of children and young people:
-
@mokey said in Royal drama:
Oprah has returned to 'clarify' that the skin tone comments weren't the Queen (not surprised) or Phillip (surprised) but still a lot of potentially innocent family members slandered by lack of specifics.
Andrew would be a good choice.
-
@snowy I don't think the ruckus with Meghan and Harry would be nearly as bad if they had actually done something about Andrew. The whole we will investigate the bullying claim from 2 years ago looks particularly pathetic against pedo prince we are pretending we don't know about.
-
@mn5 said in Royal drama:
@donsteppa said in Royal drama:
@nostrildamus said in Royal drama:
They were worried the boy would have dark skin? Not worried he might turn out to be a ginger?
Priorities, people!This has probably been around for ages, but I've seen it in a lot of Facebook comments in the last 24 hours. #TSFgoesfullDaysofOurLives
That’s an oldie but a goody. I shared it on FB years ago and got some hilarious grief from a real pro royalist who claimed there is rangas down the line somewhere and that’s why Harry has the hair that he does. Nothing to do with old what’s his name. ( apparently )
The quip from the last big tell-all Royal interview about 'three in the marriage' might have been an undercount...
-
@mokey said in Royal drama:
particularly pathetic against pedo prince we are pretending we don't know about.
Nice alliteration there, you should write books. Actually a pedo prince could be quite a good villain in an historical novel, but yes I agree. Quibbling over who was discussing "shades of grey" - beige, in this case - or bullying for that matter, is the thinnest of thinly veiled distractions from the elephant in the phone box that a pedo prince is.
-
@snowy said in Royal drama:
@mokey said in Royal drama:
Oprah has returned to 'clarify' that the skin tone comments weren't the Queen (not surprised) or Phillip (surprised) but still a lot of potentially innocent family members slandered by lack of specifics.
Andrew would be a good choice.
I don’t think that they alluded that it was a family member that made the comment.
My guess is one of the “management “. They are the real out of touch old farts terrified of negativity or being different.
I have had interactions with a number of them and they are way more pompous than the royals they work for. -
-
@crucial we watched a bit of it, i have to say thats where i think Oprah did a bad job, too many terms like the "establishment" or the "firm" etc...didn;t draw any lines between the family and the "management"...it was all a bit vague. If people are acting unacceptable...why protect them with vagueness, which really just makes everyone a suspect
-
i was also surprised how many of Megans revelations were second hand, she'd make a comment, oprah would say something like "they actually said that to you" and she would say "they said it to harry"...then why isn;t he the one saying it?
-
@sparky said in Royal drama:
The bits with the chickens were very weird.
I'm going to have ask...
Meghan related anecdotes about royals bullying chickens?
Harry has shagged a chicken?
Oprah had KFC delivered (or put under Meghan's chair)? Which really would be weird.I might actually have to watch it just to get the chicken reference.
-
@kiwiwomble said in Royal drama:
i was also surprised how many of Megans revelations were second hand, she'd make a comment, oprah would say something like "they actually said that to you" and she would say "they said it to harry"...then why isn;t he the one saying it?
This explains it