Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz
-
-
@snowy said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
They also shouldn't expect rescuing.
I dont expect they did, but thats the thing, if they notified SAR, they neednt have attempted a 'rescue', when according to this guy, they guys were prepared for the conditions.
a simple phone call could have meant the only risk was to the fellas who chose to go out, not additonal people who really didnt need to go at all.
-
@antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@crucial said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@crazy-horse and if one of the SAR guys had been injured or worse attempting to 'rescue' them?
Occupational hazard.
I'm assuming that comment is made with tongue planted firmly in cheek?
Why would you assume that?
It just seemed rather dismissive to me.
As you were. -
@crucial said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@crucial said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@crazy-horse and if one of the SAR guys had been injured or worse attempting to 'rescue' them?
Occupational hazard.
I'm assuming that comment is made with tongue planted firmly in cheek?
Why would you assume that?
It just seemed rather dismissive to me.
As you were.Concise, not dismissive.
SAR provide a valuable service but aren't beholden to rescuing people. At all times they can make the determination that it's too dangerous.
-
@antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
At all times they can make the determination that it's too dangerous.
Yep.
We didn't have controls and regs when I had to do some of it and it was dangerous. A narrow valley that I thought was the most likely to find a crash site in (and was correct) was also where a mate thought the same thing.
We missed by a couple of feet searching. Three plane crashes in one jungle valley. Great ay?
-
“Cooking steak in a toaster is literally a recipe for disaster. To have then left the house and toaster unattended for the sake of hot chips must be a constant source of regret. Never, never leave cooking unattended, even if you think you’ll just be a minute – and please, use your appliances for the purpose for which they designed. Toasters are for toast.”
-
@crucial said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
“Cooking steak in a toaster is literally a recipe for disaster. To have then left the house and toaster unattended for the sake of hot chips must be a constant source of regret. Never, never leave cooking unattended, even if you think you’ll just be a minute – and please, use your appliances for the purpose for which they designed. Toasters are for toast.”
I’d say all the Toilet paper he stocked up on ( cos I’m safely assuming he’s one of those types ) would have meant the house burnt pretty quick too.
-
@crucial policies changed from full replacement to sum insured following the Christchurch earthquakes, so I guess it is a new change... (although many insurers are now offering additional payout for non-natural disaster events, which this was, but if he has never updated it, or spoken to them)
I recall seeing a 'life hack' on a youtube or tik tok clip my kids were watching one day and was a dude on there said to cook your steak in the toaster!!
-
@taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@crucial policies changed from full replacement to sum insured following the Christchurch earthquakes, so I guess it is a new change... (although many insurers are now offering additional payout for non-natural disaster events, which this was, but if he has never updated it, or spoken to them)
I recall seeing a 'life hack' on a youtube or tik tok clip my kids were watching one day and was a dude on there said to cook your steak in the toaster!!
Incredibly dumb shit to put your steak in the toaster then go down the road for chips though.
-
@crucial well yep!
But then he was using his toaster to cook steak FFS, was probably schnitzel or some other crap, I mean what kind of tard would put a sirloin, or scotch fillet in a toaster (well any cut of meat TBF, but hey, thats just me)
I mean the name is in the appliance, TOASTER, not fryer/bbqer
-
@taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@crucial well yep!
But then he was using his toaster to cook steak FFS, was probably schnitzel or some other crap, I mean what kind of tard would put a sirloin, or scotch fillet in a toaster (well any cut of meat TBF, but hey, thats just me)
I mean the name is in the appliance, TOASTER, not fryer/bbqer
Toasters struggle with Vogels bread so I can't imagine cooking a steak in one.
-
@crucial said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@crucial well yep!
But then he was using his toaster to cook steak FFS, was probably schnitzel or some other crap, I mean what kind of tard would put a sirloin, or scotch fillet in a toaster (well any cut of meat TBF, but hey, thats just me)
I mean the name is in the appliance, TOASTER, not fryer/bbqer
Toasters struggle with Vogels bread so I can't imagine cooking a steak in one.
I have seen someone use a panini press to cook a steak. But a toaster?
-
-
@taniwharugby astonishingly they admit it's deliberate
-
I mean this could go in the Science thread, but comes in here cos of shit headline
The closest the comet is expected to get to the sun is about the distance of Saturn, which will be in 2031.
-
Britney Spears conservatorship: Judge denies request to remove father Jamie Spears as conservator - for now at least
The decision on Britney Spears' conservatorship is in response to a previous court filing relating to her father, Jamie Spears.
Feel so sorry for Britters.
-
@r-l said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
The decision on Britney Spears' conservatorship is in response to a previous court filing relating to her father, Jamie Spears.
Feel so sorry for Britters.
Haven't read any more than the headline, but given a judge has heard both sides and determined she should still be subject to the management of her father may just mean she needs to be subject to management by someone who loves and cares for her, even though maybe because, he doesn't agree to her whims.
But I haven't followed the case, nor read the judgement, nor even read the story.
-
There's obviously a lot the public aren't told, but for her to explicitly say she doesn't want her father in her life at all,I think that should be respected. There are other agencies available to fill that role. It seems very strange to me, I suspect she needs the conservatorship either way.
I don't see it ending well.
