• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Japan v All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksjapan
809 Posts 77 Posters 46.3k Views
Japan v All Blacks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    i didn't know the AB XV was playing Japan as well?

    That's not a test team. That's disrespectful to the hosts. By fuck we're arrogant.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @Bones will be pleased that Ennor is getting a run on the wing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    When I read Knowler's team my immediate thought was that he had simply listed the players that hadn't had much game time in black.

    For starters I think that BBBR will be playing and be captain (or either Cane or Ardie will start and BBBR will take over)
    The AB XV players will only get used where necessary (eg DMac on bench with RM starting and Perofeta at 15 then moving to 10 later and DMac coming on)
    Clarke still needs experience so Ennor sits on the bench for me.
    Some front rowers also need time under the belt and experience against different styles.
    So.

    Not sure of the front row mix
    BBBR at lock (PT on bench)
    One of either Cane or Savea to start
    Christie starting but Smith to get 20 minutes
    RM starting with Perofeta to swap in
    RTS/ ALB starting with Reiko on bench
    Clarke and Reece
    Perofeta at 15 with DMac on bench.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    On the positive side, if Taylor stays in the main squad which unfortunately it looks like, he needs more practice than anyone

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #9

    @Crucial I hope/think Perofeta will get some serious game time. Much as though I like DMac, I think Perofeta is the better choice and deserves the chance more

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    That suggested team also reflects the thought that players can't play 3 big games in a row. If some of these fringe players don't get an opportunity to play against Japan when do they play on this tour?

    CrucialC mariner4lifeM MN5M DuluthD 4 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #11

    @Victor-Meldrew said in Japan v All Blacks:

    @Crucial I hope/think Perofeta will get some serious game time. Much as though I like DMac, I think Perofeta is the better choice and deserves the chance more

    I think Perofeta will get 80, just that he will move positions. We need him (or DMac) as a backup option for the current BB role.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #12

    @Bovidae said in Japan v All Blacks:

    That suggested team also reflects the thought that players can't play 3 big games in a row. If some of these fringe players don't get an opportunity to play against Japan when do they play on this tour?

    It should be a balance of game time for those that need it whether in a 'A' team of not. I also don't want our main players going into the NH tour cold.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #13

    @Bovidae said in Japan v All Blacks:

    can't play 3 big games in a row

    i still think this is complete bullshit and makes test players look weak as piss

    KiwiwombleK taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #14

    @mariner4life agreed, and we should be doing everything to build that kind of strength

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #15

    @Bovidae said in Japan v All Blacks:

    That suggested team also reflects the thought that players can't play 3 big games in a row. If some of these fringe players don't get an opportunity to play against Japan when do they play on this tour?

    Kind of a pre requisite for anyone wanting to win a World Cup I woulda thought.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #16

    @mariner4life yep, if that really is the case, then why is that the case?

    That was at the heart of Henrys Rotation policy wasnt it?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Team named at 3.30pm NZT

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #18

    players can't play 3 big games in a row

    I know it’s said like this often but “can’t” is too strong. They were just referencing a slight but measurable drop in performance (gps/software tracking speeds, total distance etc)

    I would like to here it discussed by current coaches. Is this still relevant? Is it more forwards than backs? Is it because of niggles that are specific to rugby because of the variety of angles and unpredictable timing of contact etc

    As for this game I think one reason you’d pick a ‘weak’ side is because the coaches want the EOYT to mimic a RWC. So this is the equivalent of a weaker pool match. Injuries happen a lot in rugby and can derail a tournament.. so it makes sense expose the top xv slightly less but also get game time into the potential injury replacements

    I don’t really understand the negativity. This has been happening for decades and every major side does it.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #19

    @Duluth said in Japan v All Blacks:

    players can't play 3 big games in a row

    I know it’s said like this often but “can’t” is too strong. They were just referencing a slight but measurable drop in performance (gps/software tracking speeds, total distance etc)

    I would like to here it discussed by current coaches. Is this still relevant? Is it more forwards than backs? Is it because of niggles that are specific to rugby because of the variety of angles and unpredictable timing of contact etc

    As for this game I think one reason you’d pick a ‘weak’ side is because the coaches want the EOYT to mimic a RWC. So this is the equivalent of a weaker pool match. Injuries happen a lot in rugby and can derail a tournament.. so it makes sense expose the top xv slightly less but also get game time into the potential injury replacements

    I don’t really understand the negativity. This has been happening for decades and every major side does it.

    Agree. Decisions are now informed by a lot of data and it is not a generalisation but individual player based.
    It is also not so much that players can't play but that effectiveness shows a decrease or that the risk of a player having a 'flat' game is increased. If you plan for this and have the players available to rest others then why not as a risk mitigation strategy.
    I agree that perceptions are based on old coach comments and observations and it would be interesting to hear an updated take on it.
    For the next RWC we only have to worry about 3 in a row and not 4 anyway.
    The draw for us is
    Tough, easy, easy, easy, tough, tough, tough if we make the final.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #20

    @Crucial

    That’s ugly.

    Thus far, draw appears to be a pretty crucial factor in winning a WC.

    Unless there is an upset and things go pear-shaped for another strong team, I think we have our worse chance ever to win it, and that’s not only due to the weakness of this team.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #21

    @Bovidae said in Japan v All Blacks:

    This is the team that Knowler thinks could be selected.

    Possible All Blacks starting XV: Damian McKenzie, Sevu Reece, Anton Lienert-Brown, Roger Tuivasa-Sheck, Braydon Ennor, Stephen Perofeta, Finlay Christie, Hoskins Sotutu, Dalton Papali'i, Akira Ioane, Tupou Vaa'i, Patrick Tuipulotu, Nepo Laulala, Codie Taylor, George Bower.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300721156/all-blacks-damian-mckenzie-poised-to-make-unexpected-comeback-in-tokyo

    I'd select a stronger XV by starting Mo'unga and having Perofeta at fullback myself. DMac on the bench.

    That looks like a team that Japan would be very happy to face

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    The 2018 match. Teams, highlights and top fern comments: https://www.thesilverfern.com/match/2018-11-03-japan-allblacks/

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #23

    @gt12 said in Japan v All Blacks:

    @Crucial

    That’s ugly.

    Thus far, draw appears to be a pretty crucial factor in winning a WC.

    Unless there is an upset and things go pear-shaped for another strong team, I think we have our worse chance ever to win it, and that’s not only due to the weakness of this team.

    Do you mean the potential RWC run of games?

    That has been known for a long time. It's why some of the comments around the chances of the ABs are quite ridiculous. The draw has the top four teams (currently) ranked all on one side of the draw and two will get knocked out in the quarters.
    The chances of a quarter final exit are high and that's not because we are shit but because either one of SA or IRE can beat us on the day. We are all about on par IMO.

    So back on discussion (which is a diversion in itself). Unless you get a very lucky draw you always have to be strong for 3 games in a row at a RWC.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by Bovidae
    #24

    Knowler was wrong.

    https://www.allblacks.com/news/all-blacks-named-for-lipovitan-d-challenge-cup-test-against-japan/

    312559650_10159029262851915_1858029664681150020_n.jpeg

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    3

Japan v All Blacks
Rugby Matches
allblacksjapan
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.