• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Final: Chiefs v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
912 Posts 78 Posters 55.3k Views
Final: Chiefs v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Steven Harris on last edited by
    #778

    @Steven-Harris
    Disgraceful not the sort of people the Chiefs need as supporters.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    replied to Canerbry on last edited by
    #779

    @Canerbry if you see some of the abuse , you will get where I am coming from some of the stuff on the socials directly after the final were haha funny , ref got paid stuff etc ..! but to escalate it to a point we’re threats are being made ,that’s another level and totally unacceptable

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SBW1
    wrote on last edited by
    #780

    Time to focus on TRC.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #781

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #782

    Better to upgrade officials so result changing clangers aren't dropped. Treat the cause not the effect.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #783

    @Tim

    Good on NZR for standing up for the officials from some pathetic,Bitter twisted people we don’t need these sort of people involved in rugby setting kids a great example ,Do they do this shit at their kids games .
    They make me sick the gutless fluffybunnies.

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    10
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #784

    @pakman said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Better to upgrade officials so result changing clangers aren't dropped. Treat the cause not the effect.

    Wow, that's a really poor response. Criticising a referee if you disagree with his decisions is one thing; abusing him and threatening him (which is what has happened) is totally unacceptable and I can't believe that you're condoning it. Referee abuse is a major reason for the declining numbers of referees, particularly in grassroots rugby. Without them, there's no game to play or watch.

    The cause of the abusive behaviour is not the officials making a few mistakes; the cause is entirely within the abusive persons, who've lost their sense of what is acceptable behaviour and what is not. If you want to treat the cause, then these abusive people are the ones who should be "upgraded", so the abuse no longer happens and bad examples are no longer set to children and young people, who may copy that bad behaviour.

    1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #785

    @Stargazer I don't support refs being abused. But in many walks of life a person who made a mistake with the massive consequences of Saturday's would be summarily dismissed. It's a professional game now.

    NZRU ought to be investigating how to avoid a recurrence.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #786

    I didn't realise Cane never fronted the press conference afterwards. Appears pretty gutless unless he had genuine reason to skip it.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/opinion/300914202/mark-reason-referee-ben-okeeffe-played-a-blinder-and-we-should-all-shake-his-hand

    TimT WillieTheWaiterW DamoD 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #787

    @Toddy Shit captain, shit player. Absolute joke that after three years of being garbage at international level he is still AB captain. ABs with Papalii starting at seven have been so much better in the last two seasons of INTERNATIONAL RUGBY.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #788

    @Chris Absolutely feral. Get a hobby, or something better to do. If you really want to make a change get involved with your union. Though it'd be best not to announce yourself with a conspiracy theory about refs. Unless you have completely convincing evidence of some kind of favourite team advantage. Probably not the kind of thing that is presented in Instagram comments ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to pakman on last edited by taniwharugby
    #789

    @pakman I don't think you can compare what a ref does into the business world.

    Where you have 30 grown men you are trying to keep in line, while they are all trying to push the limits, and will make errors as well, not to mention you have 3 others trying to help you too, and you are saying he should be sacked because of an error that he and 3 other officials missed?

    Should ALB be similarly sacked for his error? That was quite important and could well have swung the pendulum to the Crusaders victory.

    Usually only lose your job on the spot through gross negligence, which mean you think they weren't errors, they were deliberate actions, as in he cheated?

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by pakman
    #790

    @taniwharugby said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @pakman I don't think you can compare what a ref does into the business world.

    Where you have 30 grown men you are trying to keep in line, while they are all trying to push the limits, not to mention you have 3 others trying to help you too, and you are saying he should be sacked because of an error that he and 3 other officials missed?

    Should ALB be similarly sacked for his error? That was quite important and could well have swung the pendulum to the Crusaders victory.

    Usually only lose your job on the spot through gross negligence, which mean you think they weren't errors, they were deliberate actions, as in he cheated?

    I'm not actually gunning for BOK.

    But sport is now business. We have two touchies aided by technology to try and improve the game.

    Pre technology the second Narawa try stands and Chiefs win going away. Maybe ALB doesn't see yellow even.
    If we embrace technology in the professional era we need to ensure the results of games aren't reversed through ropey application.

    We know from the technology that the Mo'unga try was bogus. One can try and cite various protocols to explain things away, but the plain fact remains that between two touchies and the TMO watching real time, even though BOK missed it, the system ought to have tipped him off and the scrum Chiefs been awarded.

    As a business, NZRU need to look into why the error occurred and what can be changed going forward to ensure such errors don't recur.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    chucknz
    wrote on last edited by
    #791

    So no chief player is responsible for any of their own decisions?

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #792

    Sam Cane being a has been shithouse player, who would not be in any other tier one XV, was one of the main reasons that the Chiefs lost.

    ABs go out in the QF, and the main reason is loser Cane is preferred over a vastly better player at international level for the last two years - Papalii.

    What tier one team would Cane start for? None. He is shit.

    Dan54D MiketheSnowM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by
    #793

    Some people not exactly covering themselves in glory following this game. My memory is as selective as everyone else's but I cannot recall such a bitter and twisted aftermath from a local NZ game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Tim on last edited by Dan54
    #794

    @Tim said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Sam Cane being a has been shithouse player, who would not be in any other tier one XV, was one of the main reasons that the Chiefs lost.

    ABs go out in the QF, and the main reason is loser Cane is preferred over a vastly better player at international level for the last two years - Papalii.

    What tier one team would Cane start for? None. He is shit.

    Your opinion I know (and no problem with it), but if I was selecting Cane would be starting everyday of the week for ABs. But then again I think Papalii is pretty good, just what I prefer at test level is someone who tackles all day, gets off ground as quick as and stays involved in game etc.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #795

    @pakman the more you post the sweeter the victory is.

    Forget the NZRU looking into anything, the Chiefs need to have a full on review on whoever made the decision to go for that penalty kick from beyond half way. On a night when the conditions were not going to give the kicker any love it seemed a very poor and low percentage decision.

    Was it because they didn’t trust their set piece? (Lineout risk)
    Was it because DMac thought I did it last week why not tonight? (Different conditions)

    That penalty gave Chiefs some needed momentum, but the decision to kick for goal IMO took that momentum away.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #796

    Why is everyone acting like the on field officials had no idea about Dmac being offside? The ref and touchie seemed to immediately be talking about it and specifically called it out when referring in to the tmo. If there was no tmo then I think that try still gets called back based on what the touch judge saw. As others have pointed out, the markings on the field made it really blatant that he wasn't back 10.

    StargazerS boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    replied to Canerbry on last edited by Old Samurai Jack
    #797

    @Canerbry said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @Steven-Harris said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Thought Chiefs supporters were better than that.

    Big call there.

    Can't up-vote that but it is a pretty funny delivery😁
    The reaction to this game is bizarre. McMillian's comments after the game were also fairly borderline. Asked about the refs, he said look at the crowd's reaction (booing at ceremony), that shows you something or words to that effect. Pretty poor all round really.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6

Final: Chiefs v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.