• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

QF - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bophawkesbay
128 Posts 32 Posters 5.0k Views
QF - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Smudge on last edited by
    #15

    @Smudge said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @Nepia said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @SouthernMann said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    So will Hawke's be without a playmaker, loose forward or replacement forward? https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/499223/hawke-s-bay-rugby-union-player-charged-with-drink-driving

    Hopefully a Tiatia.

    He had his one diamonds this weekend, he'll be back to rocks again on Sunday.

    I'm just shocked you're trying not to pin this on Chris Eaton, even if he's retired.

    TBF, if he was still playing we'd likely be able to pin all of it on him. 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SmudgeS Do not disturb
    SmudgeS Do not disturb
    Smudge
    replied to Magpie_in_aus on last edited by
    #16

    @Magpie_in_aus said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    Can we update the thread heading please.

    The Bay vs The Ranfurly Shields holders

    I've asked the mods.

    They said no.

    1 Reply Last reply
    11
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Magpie_in_aus on last edited by
    #17

    @Magpie_in_aus said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    Can we update the thread heading please.

    The Bay vs The Ranfurly Shields holders

    I think it's perfectly obvious that the prison striped gang are entirely unable to hold onto the shield.

    Magpie_in_ausM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    I understand that the shield is actually to be held in Wellington for the summer

    So HB aren't holding shit

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    BOP Vs Waikato? Very confusing

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_aus
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #20

    @Machpants hold onto the shields*

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Magpie_in_aus on last edited by
    #21

    @Magpie_in_aus said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    Can we update the thread heading please.

    The Bay vs The Ranfurly Shields holders

    That wouldn't be entirely accurate would it?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    These scumbags had the Shield win revoked yet?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Was really surprised to see the amount of players the Bay had back against Ta$man at the end of storm week. Hoping the main league type story of this week keeps the focus off the rugby to help prep for the QF.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    I think the Shield saga makes this game even harder to read now. Think we will get one of the extremes... Hawkes may come out firing with a big siege mentality from the week they're going through. Or it may all be too big a distraction if key players are out? I'm glad I don't have to tip this game...

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #25
    Oct 3, 2023

    Hawke's Bay player facing charge available to play quarter-final

    Hawke's Bay player facing charge available to play quarter-final

    Broken Ranfurly Shield controversy rumbles on, with the union's chief executive stating today that no disciplinary measures will happen before weekend.

    This seems bizarre to me. Surely it isn't a matter of an employment issue, and rather a, you are dropped for partying way too hard?

    taniwharugbyT StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to frugby on last edited by taniwharugby
    #26

    @frugby I guess it makes it very hard for them to maintain name suppression (employment disciplinary issue) and at the same time, drop a player for the quarter...guess easier to drag heels, deal internally.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #27

    @frugby RTS wasn't dropped by Auckland Rugby either after "partying way too hard" and subsequently being charged with drink-driving. And that even didn't make the media AFAIK.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #28

    @Stargazer said in QF - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @frugby RTS wasn't dropped by Auckland Rugby either after "partying way too hard" and subsequently being charged with drink-driving. And that even didn't make the media AFAIK.

    Wasn't that not during the season though (not excusing the behaviour, but think that is the main point of concern?)

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to frugby on last edited by Stargazer
    #29

    @frugby No, it was the morning after the game v Manawatu (played on 30 August), and he started and played the full 80 minutes in the next game v Southland (played on 3 September).

    Edited to add that a fully fit player's body can handle this if it isn't a weekly habit. Drinking alcohol promotes dehydration and delays the body's recovery from physical exercise.

    Drink too much too often, and it will become a problem for an athlete.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_aus
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    I reckon its shit that they can play....I mean from a standards and organisation standpoint they should have things in place that these players are supported but not avoid consequences. What I mean by that is if you have things like this occur its an automatic X amount of weeks stand-down and attending counselling/help etc.

    He had passengers as well this could easily be a lot worse then a dented fence. The courts will deal out the community punishment but I think teams/organisations should be firm on these things. You will be punished but we want to support you through this. For players it will be a ticking-the-box exercise, some will change behaviour for awhile and for some hopefully give them tools to not do some of this stupid stuff.

    HB is the example at the moment but this is systemic.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Magpie_in_aus on last edited by
    #31

    @Magpie_in_aus said in QF - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    HB is the example at the moment but this is systemic.

    football organisations prioritising winning games of football is a worldwide phenomenon

    Magpie_in_ausM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    I think the players should be able to play. I also think the shield should be taken off HB.

    Of course, if it was Auckland, then it would just be a case of lads being lads... 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_aus
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #33

    @mariner4life said in QF - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @Magpie_in_aus said in QF - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    HB is the example at the moment but this is systemic.

    football organisations prioritising winning games of football is a worldwide phenomenon

    Whats soccer got to do with this?

    But yeah I know, being lax for organisations is the easier way. Its like the bullshit the AB's use to have the no dickhead policy. Biggest joke given the amount of drink drivers/sleeping pill users/domestic abusers/idiots that played during this era. Its just something that's easy to say when you are winning everything and dominating.

    I wonder if we can roll that out for HB seeing we just won the shield/s.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    Instead of standing them down for an x-number of matches, I'd like players who abuse substances and still drive, to be forced to do community work with the victims of drink (and drug)-driving. Not sure who can organise that; maybe via victim support? Confront them with the misery it can cause, sometimes life-long disabilities or death of a loved one. Make them work (for free) at a rehabilitation centre. In fact, I'd like all those convicted of drink-driving to do that, because frankly, this has nothing to do with rugby/sport. Our society has a serious problem with alcohol (and other substance) abuse.

    Also make them follow extra courses on nutrition and the effect alcohol has on the body and exercise (recovery). It's bad enough that NZ has this awful drinking culture, but sportspeople should really understand (or be made to understand) that drinking affects their athletic performance if they drink regularly during the season and even more so if they drink too much.

    Magpie_in_ausM 1 Reply Last reply
    6

QF - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers
Rugby Matches
bophawkesbay
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.