• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Grumpy Old Man

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
3.3k Posts 65 Posters 251.9k Views
Grumpy Old Man
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #2738

    @dogmeat said in Grumpy Old Man:

    @voodoo @Nepia

    I am happy to be in the lounge an hour or a bit more before my flight is called, but you're still just killing time.

    Fortunately, I can get into any Star Alliance lounge but 4 hours is ridiculous.

    Yep, it is, and he usually doesn't have lounge access. He even wanted to go to the airport early in Raro before they did the renovations and it was just a hot square waiting room.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #2739

    going to the Airport is generally a cause for a fight in my house as my wife will not relax until we are checked in and through security, and i refuse to get to the airport even a minute too early.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #2740

    @dogmeat I've had to train the other half down from 5 hours...

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by MajorRage
    #2741

    Boys, it's about how you play it. I'm all about the minimum possible time, but when with the family the wife will always go ridiculously early. We live 20 mins from Heathrow T5 and will happily pay extra to fly out of it, it's never let me down (until the next time now of course, after writing that).

    So we go 2-3 hours early, bags dropped, through security its usually at least 2 hours now til flight. Girls like to shop, so I hit the bar with the boys Unlock his screen time so he'll be quiet and I have a couple of beers.

    Whats not to like?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #2742

    @MajorRage we hit a lounge now as can pick it up for 20 squid. All you can eat buffet and all you can drink beer/wine.

    I'd spend more than that just on food on the "outside".

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #2743

    I have a 9 year old daughter. She is into music that is pretty much so targeted at young girls. Taylor Swift, Olivia Rodrigo & somebody called Bailey Spinn are the 3 that come to mind.

    Taylor Swift aside, why do these musicians, who know young girls love them, insist on swearing so much on their albums? What are they actually trying to achieve? If you put Olivia Rodrigo on Spotify then play her Radio, almost every song has swearing in it. If you are doing this to try and target your music elsewhere, then you need to do a different genre of music! Not play kid friendly stuff, then add in the word fuck quite often to make you appear as something else.

    Yes, I know that you can change the setting in Spotify & I know that Rodrigo has released "clean" versions of some her songs, but every kid knows how to get around these things. Besides, Rodrigos big song Vampire (which is awesome), the clean lyrics actually sound much better. It literally looks like she' put the word fuck in there, just to put in there.

    It's fucking stupid.

    taniwharugbyT MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by MajorRage
    #2744

    Whinge 2 for today.

    That a picture of Travis Kelce with Taylor Swift is the photo the BBC is using for their article of the KC Chiefs vs the 49ers being in the Superbowl.

    She. Isn't. The. Story.Screenshot 2024-01-29 at 17.16.30.png

    nzzpN SmudgeS 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #2745

    @MajorRage said in Grumpy Old Man:

    She. Isn't. The. Story.

    She is for junior reporters

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by taniwharugby
    #2746

    @MajorRage it is quite amazing how song lyrics seem to get around censors, and just how some of these songs get airtime, particularly in today's cancel culture (I'm looking at WAP I think it is, and Kiss by Eminem which seem huge outliers)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by MN5
    #2747

    @MajorRage said in Grumpy Old Man:

    I have a 9 year old daughter. She is into music that is pretty much so targeted at young girls. Taylor Swift, Olivia Rodrigo & somebody called Bailey Spinn are the 3 that come to mind.

    Taylor Swift aside, why do these musicians, who know young girls love them, insist on swearing so much on their albums? What are they actually trying to achieve? If you put Olivia Rodrigo on Spotify then play her Radio, almost every song has swearing in it. If you are doing this to try and target your music elsewhere, then you need to do a different genre of music! Not play kid friendly stuff, then add in the word fuck quite often to make you appear as something else.

    Yes, I know that you can change the setting in Spotify & I know that Rodrigo has released "clean" versions of some her songs, but every kid knows how to get around these things. Besides, Rodrigos big song Vampire (which is awesome), the clean lyrics actually sound much better. It literally looks like she' put the word fuck in there, just to put in there.

    It's fucking stupid.

    Swearing in songs has been cool since forever.

    I remember when car pooling for cricket back in the 80s and four of us kids piled into the car. My mates Dad always had the Who on the stereo and we’d all absolutely crack up when Roger Daltrey busted out “Who the fuck are you?”

    We also thought that “I’m your Venus” was describing something else that sounded like Venus.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #2748

    @MN5 the who weren’t writing songs clearly targeted at young girls.

    That’s the rant.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SmudgeS Offline
    SmudgeS Offline
    Smudge
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #2749

    @MajorRage said in Grumpy Old Man:

    Whinge 2 for today.

    That a picture of Travis Kelce with Taylor Swift is the photo the BBC is using for their article of the KC Chiefs vs the 49ers being in the Superbowl.

    She. Isn't. The. Story.Screenshot 2024-01-29 at 17.16.30.png

    She isn't the story, but you could almost guarantee that photo would double the click-through rate on that story.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #2750

    @MajorRage said in Grumpy Old Man:

    @MN5 the who weren’t writing songs clearly targeted at young girls.

    That’s the rant.

    Well they certainly rooted enough of them so I’d say they did indirectly at the very least

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Smudge on last edited by
    #2751

    @Smudge said in Grumpy Old Man:

    @MajorRage said in Grumpy Old Man:

    Whinge 2 for today.

    That a picture of Travis Kelce with Taylor Swift is the photo the BBC is using for their article of the KC Chiefs vs the 49ers being in the Superbowl.

    She. Isn't. The. Story.Screenshot 2024-01-29 at 17.16.30.png

    She isn't the story, but you could almost guarantee that photo would double the click-through rate on that story.

    Up until she started dating him, I'd never heard of him. And I'm not a Swift fan.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #2752

    I'm out the other side of the swearing debate, with kids 19 and 16. Even Mrs TA is resigned to it, tho she will kick up if it is what she deems gratuitous.

    She needs to fucking relax.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by No Quarter
    #2753

    The swearing stuff is so overblown, unless it's really explicit stuff. I remember when my boy was about 6, a couple of older kids decided to pick on him and his mate during lunch time, spitting at them and pushing them around. My boy ended up telling them 'F off'. When the teachers were told about it, the two older kids said my boy swore at them, and the school seemed to deem his offence equally as bad as the two older kids, and just described it as an 'unsavory incident'. I was fucking fuming, met with the deputy principle, and said to her that his use of the F word was entirely appropriate, and is in fact is why it exists in our language, and that I would not be disciplining him in any way, shape or form as a result.

    1 Reply Last reply
    12
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    scribe
    wrote on last edited by
    #2754

    Principal

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #2755

    In support of @MajorRage

    Am not a prude but I'm not a fan of gratuitous, or voluminous (not sure if tge right word, but am sure you get what I mean) swearing.

    Unnecessary and often detracts from the point you're making.

    Am in full agreement with the Major re song lyrics.

    Cut it back. You're not cool and edgy. Everybody does it. Be better and use better words. It's cooler.

    A couple of swearing anecdotes:

    Back in the day I worked in a warehouse (not Warehouse) as a storeman. we came to the realisation that our language was atrocious. Every second word. Made a real effort (swear jar etc) and everything just sounded nicer. Was just unnecessary.

    Second. Heard an interview recently. Can't remember who, but some arrogant business dude. Can't have been on normal radio as he continually dropped the f-bomb. It gave me the impression that he was trying to show how cool and superior he was because he had a special privilege to be allowed to swear. But it really detracted from his message. If he was really cool his words would gave sufficient gravitas without the swearing.

    CatograndeC MajorRageM Dan54D 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #2756

    As for @MajorRage 's GOM on Taytay.

    She IS the story. The NFL is secondary. As much as us sports fans gate it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #2757

    I swear more on the Fern than I do in real life. Not sure why, I just do, but in real life my swearing is usually restricted to watching rugby.

    But not sure where I stand on swearing in songs. I'm more annoyed with musicians and actors who promote smoking and vaping.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Grumpy Old Man
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.