Ashes 2019
-
@Billy-Webb You'd always want Anderson in English conditions although I don't think they would have been the ideal pitches for him. And at 37, he surely can't go on much longer.
Amazingly, Hazelwood wasn't even picked for the 1st test which seems bizarre looking back. English batsmen have got better at playing Lyon and with only 2 left-handers in their top order, he is not as effective - not to mention Moeen being dropped meant 2 fewer wickets per match for Nathan.
On Roy, all the English pundits were convinced that he should be given a go for the Ashes despite being a notable flat track bully who looks all at sea against the moving ball. I'm not sure what they will do with him - especially if he makes some runs at the Oval.
-
@Snowy Australia won in 1979 and 1980 and it wasn't contested in 1981.
I recall some of that tour to Australia - we played Sydney first up and they had pretty much the NSW team and most of the Australian team and declared themselves favourites. Ended up a draw so it wasn't an outrageous claim.
-
@KiwiPie said in Ashes 2019:
On Roy, all the English pundits were convinced that he should be given a go for the Ashes despite being a notable flat track bully who looks all at sea against the moving ball.
He could make the simplest adjustment to his technique and avoid that issue tho - the fucking gate he leaves for the seaming in-ducker is criminal.
-
@NTA said in Ashes 2019:
@KiwiPie said in Ashes 2019:
On Roy, all the English pundits were convinced that he should be given a go for the Ashes despite being a notable flat track bully who looks all at sea against the moving ball.
He could make the simplest adjustment to his technique and avoid that issue tho - the fucking gate he leaves for the seaming in-ducker is criminal.
He seems to have concrete in his boots. From that firm base, he jabs hard at the ball to defend it. Very strange.
-
@Billy-Webb said in Ashes 2019:
So it transpires that Australia can in fact win tests without resorting to boorish, aggressive, head-butting-the-line on-field behaviour. Who knew?
Well done to Tim Paine et al.
Maybe not.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12266258
They were on the pitch too.
-
@Snowy Good on them - looks like they had a lot of (mostly) good natured fun, enjoyed a huge moment for the first time since '01, and fired a few shots back at the English crowd who've been at them for months.
After the English taking a slash outside off-stump on the pitch at the Oval that time, The Sun is in a glass house as usual.
-
Ha! Eat 50 shades of dick newspaper clowns. You probably didn't say shit when your chav crowd booed everything Smith did, or criticise the umpires when your team stole a CWC. Now you want to take the moral high ground?
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Boo that you fluffybunnies!
-
-
@Donsteppa said in Ashes 2019:
@Snowy Good on them - looks like they had a lot of (mostly) good natured fun, enjoyed a huge moment for the first time since '01, and fired a few shots back at the English crowd who've been at them for months.
After the English taking a slash outside off-stump on the pitch at the Oval that time, The Sun is in a glass house as usual.
I think the media forget how the aussie team used to act DURING the games. They won, they deserve to enjoy the spoils.
-
Classic test match on Fox Sports. Fuck Daryl Hair was a blatant cheat.
-
@mariner4life said in Ashes 2019:
Classic test match on Fox Sports. Fuck Daryl Hair was a blatant cheat.
His umpiring is one of the key reasons why I am so strongly in favour of DRS.