• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks 10 after BB & RM finish?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
142 Posts 41 Posters 6.3k Views
All Blacks 10 after BB & RM finish?
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #2

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    ABs running around like headless chooks.

    while Richie Mo'unga is your starting 10, and BBarrett is your backup, you aren't going to see much else no matter who has "head Coach" on his office door.

    The interesting thing about that is both look like being gone post WC.

    Who the hell is next in line
    McKenzie,
    Perofeta needs game time in that position.
    Gatland,
    Burke
    Cameron

    No one really stands out,Probably need one of the young ones in the squads or just underneath that tier to come through.
    And will it be a creative type First Five they look for or someone who just does the basic well, but maybe not an attacking threat.

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Zarn Sullivan has all the tools. Will be interesting to see who emerges in 2024. Both the young Hurricanes 10s look handy.

    ChrisC 2 Replies Last reply
    6
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #4

    @Tim said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Zarn Sullivan has all the tools. Will be interesting to see who emerges in 2024. Both the young Hurricanes 10s look handy.

    Yep there is 3 more I missed

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #5

    @Tim said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Zarn Sullivan has all the tools. Will be interesting to see who emerges in 2024. Both the young Hurricanes 10s look handy.

    Another part to that in 2024 will Sullivan get a chance at the Blues ?
    Or Perofeta takes over 10.
    If the latter happens will Sullivan have to move.
    Another one maybe Taha Kemara if he can get game time. when RM goes to Japan more 2025 onwards for him I guess.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #6

    Zarn Sullivan - everything screams "All Black" when you see him play - has to play at 10 at SR and NPC level first. Love wasn't good at 10 for the Canes at all, and is more a fullback. Morgan, still far and far away. I'd pick Josh Ioane ahead of him.

    Of the youngest crop, Kemara, Cam Miller, Harry Godfrey, Lucas Cashmore, maybe Alex Harford (I'm sure I forgot someone), are the ones to look out for, but for them, 2024 will be too soon.

    Brett Cameron? Needs a few good SR seasons first. Not convinced. I'd pick Lincoln McClutchie over him.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by Bovidae
    #7

    I'll be interested to see what Gatland does as he is off-contract next year. His game would be perfectly suited to the NH.

    Add Trask to the contenders, as he is obviously the 1st 5 the Chiefs will use going forward. Reihana is also in the mix.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    To me, it's essential that players actually play at 10 at SR level, to be considered as an ABs 10 (starter or bench). If they play at fullback for their SR franchise, they shouldn't be more than 10 injury cover for the ABs.

    ChrisC KirwanK 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    I split this off so people may actually read it. The original thread, for obvious reasons, is the most ignored on the forum

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by Chris
    #10

    @Stargazer said in All Blacks 10 after BB & RM finish?:

    To me, it's essential that players actually play at 10 at SR level, to be considered as an ABs 10 (starter or bench). If they play at fullback for their SR franchise, they shouldn't be more than 10 injury cover for the ABs.

    Yep agree, The next First Five Should be playing that position during SR.
    Pretty tough playing SR at FB then converting to 10 for internationals.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #11

    @Stargazer said in All Blacks 10 after BB & RM finish?:

    To me, it's essential that players actually play at 10 at SR level, to be considered as an ABs 10 (starter or bench). If they play at fullback for their SR franchise, they shouldn't be more than 10 injury cover for the ABs.

    Perofeta and Sullivan (whoever starts at 15) will likely be getting 25/30mins at the end of games, and the occasional start at 10 at SR level.

    With BB now slotting in at fullback for the ABs, I'd like to see him stay there at SR level too. Helps Perofeta develop and both players playing there helps the ABs next year.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by Canes4life
    #12

    Ruben Love was very good at fullback this year for all the teams he represented. Probably hasn’t had a tone of game time at 10 but he has shown with the few games he’s played in that position that he is more than capable of being a top first five in NZ. An example that springs to mind is when he came on at 10 in that Hurricanes V Blues game earlier this year where he was heavily influential in the Hurricanes come back win.

    In saying that I feel Love is a fullback first and a first five second so whether we even see him in that 10 jersey going forward remains to be seen.

    We really look a bit meh at 10 if Barrett and Mo’unga move on. McKenzie is probably the standout. All of Gatland, Perofeta, Cameron and Burke don’t really set the house on fire for me and the younger guys like Morgan, Sullivan, McLutchie need to prove themselves more over the next 2 years.

    Dan54D BonesB sparkyS 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #13

    @Canes4life said in All Blacks 10 after BB & RM finish?:

    Ruben Love was very good at fullback this year for all the teams he represented. Probably hasn’t had a tone of game time at 10 but he has shown with the few games he’s played in that position that he is more than capable of being a top first five in NZ. An example that springs to mind is when he came on at 10 in that Hurricanes V Blues game earlier this year where he was heavily influential in the Hurricanes come back win.

    In saying that I feel Love is a fullback first and a first five second so whether we even see him in that 10 jersey going forward remains to be seen.

    We really look a bit meh at 10 if Barrett and Mo’unga move on. McKenzie is probably the standout. All of Gatland, Perofeta, Cameron and Burke don’t really set the house on fire for me and the younger guys like Morgan, Sullivan, McLutchie need to prove themselves more over the next 2 years.

    Yep we have been spoilt for a few years, and will take a few years for a new to really settle at test level, well usually does.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #14

    @Canes4life wax lyrical about a guy who's a handy fullback and shithouse 10, apart from that one game where he played 5 minutes of good rugby...but yeah none of the others who have actually played in the position and performed to a much higher level light your fire...
    alt text

    You could occasionally try removing your head from the anus of the hurricanes, when forming your opinion.

    MN5M Canes4lifeC 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #15
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #16

    while there always seems to be an abundance of talented kids running about, its the development and learning form the old hands at club - NPC and above that is the issue as these kids tend to go straight from school into super squads.

    DC was 20 when he played for Canterbury, 21 when he played for the Crusaders, but when he was an established AB, we had several 10s sitting behind him that we'd likely kill for right now: Slade, Cruden, Donald...

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to Bones on last edited by Canes4life
    #17

    @Bones said in All Blacks 10 after BB & RM finish?:

    @Canes4life wax lyrical about a guy who's a handy fullback and shithouse 10, apart from that one game where he played 5 minutes of good rugby...but yeah none of the others who have actually played in the position and performed to a much higher level light your fire...
    alt text

    You could occasionally try removing your head from the anus of the hurricanes, when forming your opinion.

    That’s exactly it, he’s hardly played 10 so how can you call him a shithouse 10 when he’s barely played in that position in almost a year. Seems very logical.

    I’m forming my opinion based off what I’ve seen from him as a fullback, I couldn’t care less if he was in the Hurricanes. Beaudy made a successful transition from being a classy fullback to a sound 10, same with McKenzie. There is no reason guys like Love and Sullivan can’t do the same with more time running the cutter.

    Just look at Love’s qualities. He’s not afraid to attack the line, he’s a solid defender, he’s got a sound boot on him and he’s not afraid to bark orders. He also seems to thrive under pressure. These are the ingredients that form the foundation of a quality first five. Am I right, or am I right?

    As a rugby player he’s definitely got a higher ceiling than the likes of Hunt, Gatland, McLutchie, Burke etc who are all either too small or just a bit shit from what I’ve seen. If they make the All Blacks we are in trouble. Period. Same goes with Cameron who by the way is in the Hurricanes.

    Right now the top four guys I would even consider as an AB 10 in the future would be Perofeta, Sullivan (same reasoning as Love), Love and the obvious one being McKenzie. Ironically they are all probably considered fullbacks before first fives, but I guess our options decrease rapidly when the regular 10s in NZ rugby atm are just not cutting it.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
    #18

    Weird that no one is talking about McKenzie's performances for NZ XV and Barbarians. He's probably our form 10 at the moment, he's certainly looked a superior game-manager to Barrett and Mo'unga recently & I highly doubt McMillan will use him at 15 again. Dmac is the future at 10 and is the obvious candidate, yet people on here are still carrying on as if he's a fullback. He's always been a better 10, even as far back as his school boy years.

    Canes4lifeC StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to kiwi_expat on last edited by
    #19

    @kiwi_expat said in All Blacks 10 after BB & RM finish?:

    Weird that no one is talking about McKenzie's performances for NZ XV and Barbarians. He's probably our form 10 at the moment, he's certainly looked a superior game-manager to Barrett and Mo'unga recently & I highly doubt McMillan will use him at 15 again. Dmac is the future at 10 and is the obvious candidate, yet people on here are still carrying on as if he's still a fullback. He's always been better at 10, even as far back as his school boy years.

    I agree with you that McKenzie is the guy post World Cup. Even though I see him as a fullback first, he has more than shown his worth at 10 on the international stage and is the only guy with any real experience at test level. He’s the best option we have by quite a long way until others get more international minutes under their belt.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to kiwi_expat on last edited by
    #20

    @kiwi_expat said in All Blacks 10 after BB & RM finish?:

    Weird that no one is talking about McKenzie's performances for NZ XV and Barbarians. He's probably our form 10 at the moment, he's certainly looked a superior game-manager to Barrett and Mo'unga recently & I highly doubt McMillan will use him at 15 again. Dmac is the future at 10 and is the obvious candidate, yet people on here are still carrying on as if he's a fullback. He's always been a better 10, even as far back as his school boy years.

    Nothing weird about that. See the second post of this thread. @Chris made a list that started this discussion. McKenzie is right at the top of the list. Maybe, just maybe, there was no reason to discuss McKenzie because everyone agreed with that placement at the top of the list?

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mr Fish
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    To be fair, there's a good chance McKenzie won't stay in NZ after the World Cup either.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1

All Blacks 10 after BB & RM finish?
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.