• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Final - Crusaders v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
917 Posts 75 Posters 3.7k Views
Final - Crusaders v Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote last edited by Steven Harris
    #319

    Newall is a fast learner

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    replied to sparky last edited by
    #320

    @sparky said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Chiefs Props saying "hello" to the AB selectors.

    Jinxed it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to sparky last edited by nostrildamus
    #321

    @sparky said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Chiefs Props saying "hello" to the AB selectors.

    It's a great prop battle isn't it and the non AB props are putting their hands up and out so far!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Bones last edited by
    #322

    @Bones said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Steven-Harris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    So why hasn’t Narawa gone off for an HIA ..?

    Why should a player be forced to leave the field when he doesn't need to because of foul play from another?

    It’s not about the foul play per se, it’s the fact he has received a head knock that has been deemed serious enough for a card to be given.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Bones last edited by
    #323

    @Bones said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Steven-Harris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    So why hasn’t Narawa gone off for an HIA ..?

    Why should a player be forced to leave the field when he doesn't need to because of foul play from another?

    Because that’s World Rugby’s rationale

    Post-career head problems are the result of single big hits AND successive smaller ones

    If a player cops one to the head that’s deemed YC or RC worthy by the officials then they should be removed from play for an HIA

    Otherwise, what’s the point?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph last edited by
    #324

    @KiwiMurph well not at this level...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to MiketheSnow last edited by
    #325

    @MiketheSnow said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Bones said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Steven-Harris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    So why hasn’t Narawa gone off for an HIA ..?

    Why should a player be forced to leave the field when he doesn't need to because of foul play from another?

    Because that’s World Rugby’s rationale

    Post-career head problems are the result of single big hits AND successive smaller ones

    If a player cops one to the head that’s deemed YC or RC worthy by the officials then they should be removed from play for an HIA

    Otherwise, what’s the point?

    Nah, that one's for the PC thread.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote last edited by
    #326

    Crusaders like tackling while almost standing upright tonight...

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote last edited by
    #327

    Good reffing

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote last edited by
    #328

    Penalty for what ..shoulder for now part of the head 🤦🏻

    KiwiMurphK canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Donsteppa last edited by
    #329

    @Donsteppa said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Crusaders like tackling while almost standing upright tonight...

    But that was a good hit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    wrote last edited by
    #330

    So whats the pen actually for?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote last edited by
    #331

    No arms tackle.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Steven Harris last edited by
    #332

    @Steven-Harris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Penalty for what ..shoulder for now part of the head 🤦🏻

    No arms pal

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote last edited by
    #333

    That's not a penalty!!!

    I hate this fucking sport

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Steven Harris last edited by
    #334

    @Steven-Harris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Penalty for what ..shoulder for now part of the head 🤦🏻

    No arms in tackle?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • JayCeeJ Offline
    JayCeeJ Offline
    JayCee
    wrote last edited by
    #335
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote last edited by
    #336

    More bad technique

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote last edited by
    #337

    Yeah I thought no arms tackle but ref didn't seem to say that

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote last edited by
    #338

    Ah Kuoi has been good so far.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Final - Crusaders v Chiefs
Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.