• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Chiefs v Reds

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefsreds
135 Posts 30 Posters 2.6k Views
Chiefs v Reds
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #119

    @MajorRage said in Chiefs v Reds:

    Reading that the replay showed the last held up as worth a look as scored? That legit or bollocks?

    Bollocks

    Reds would be going bonkers if it was down.

    Looked well and truly held up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #120

    @Donsteppa said in Chiefs v Reds:

    @SammyC said in Chiefs v Reds:

    Chiefs lost all breakdown presence when Cane went off

    Izack Rodda is a good player.

    TTT can’t posssibly make the all blacks squad, his passing is worse than Weber.

    Cane subbed seven minutes after a ten minute half time break = Super Coach Colin Cooper.

    Huh? I'm pretty sure you're smarter than that and haven't just come out of a 90s time capsule..

    It's been common practice for years now for coaches to begin subbing shortly after half time, one big reason is it allows the replacement to warm up.

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #121

    @booboo said in Chiefs v Reds:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Chiefs v Reds:

    That's ridiculous. Not often I feel sorry for the Reds. They deserved to score then.

    Really? 80% possession and the best the yh can do is bash against a brick wall?

    Can still feel a little sorry for them. But I think much of that has to do with BBBT being in charge. Terrible backline though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #122

    @Bones said in Chiefs v Reds:

    @Donsteppa said in Chiefs v Reds:

    @SammyC said in Chiefs v Reds:

    Chiefs lost all breakdown presence when Cane went off

    Izack Rodda is a good player.

    TTT can’t posssibly make the all blacks squad, his passing is worse than Weber.

    Cane subbed seven minutes after a ten minute half time break = Super Coach Colin Cooper.

    Huh? I'm pretty sure you're smarter than that and haven't just come out of a 90s time capsule..

    It's been common practice for years now for coaches to begin subbing shortly after half time, one big reason is it allows the replacement to warm up.

    55 minute mark, sure. Much earlier than that and I usually think the half time break has mostly been wasted.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #123

    @Donsteppa said in Chiefs v Reds:

    @Bones said in Chiefs v Reds:

    @Donsteppa said in Chiefs v Reds:

    @SammyC said in Chiefs v Reds:

    Chiefs lost all breakdown presence when Cane went off

    Izack Rodda is a good player.

    TTT can’t posssibly make the all blacks squad, his passing is worse than Weber.

    Cane subbed seven minutes after a ten minute half time break = Super Coach Colin Cooper.

    Huh? I'm pretty sure you're smarter than that and haven't just come out of a 90s time capsule..

    It's been common practice for years now for coaches to begin subbing shortly after half time, one big reason is it allows the replacement to warm up.

    55 minute mark, sure. Much earlier than that and I usually think the half time break has mostly been wasted.

    What? More like 45 minute mark. How would that have been a waste of the half time break?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    Well, blow me down. For the Etene-mumble mumble, the TMO got a replay that no-one else did. Looks a far better decision in hindsight... at the time I just shook my head.

    alt text

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #125

    @nzzp there was one replay last night that clearly showed seperation. I am pretty sure it was shown at the same time the commentator was saying "it's a try every day of the week".

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #126

    @Crazy-Horse Yes, I even mentioned it in this thread.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #127

    @Stargazer said in Chiefs v Reds:

    @Crazy-Horse Yes, I even mentioned it in this thread.

    ah cool - sorry, missed that last night with half an eye on the game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by
    #128

    Hail the TMO..great call ..!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #129

    That photo is after the grounding.
    I saw possible separation on one of the replays but not clear and obvious. Even so the ball didn’t trace out of the hand toward the dead ball line so wasn’t a lost forward. It went straight down.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    wrote on last edited by
    #130

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/112999158/super-rugby-more-contentious-refereeing-decisions-as-chiefs-denied-try

    It would be good if we all got to see these angles and save all of the controversy over these decisions. Surely the broadcaster can just play what they are showing the TMO?

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #131

    I saw a clear and obvious separation in the last shot of the replay. But obviously, that was in slow motion.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #132

    @Snowy said in Chiefs v Reds:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/112999158/super-rugby-more-contentious-refereeing-decisions-as-chiefs-denied-try

    It would be good if we all got to see these angles and save all of the controversy over these decisions. Surely the broadcaster can just play what they are showing the TMO?

    The conspiracy theorist in me wonders if the extra camera angle story has been crafted to avoid a controversy like we had last week.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #133

    @Crazy-Horse Are you doubting the journalistic integrity of Stuff?

    Kidding, but if they would just show it all (so to speak) it would remove some of the issues and lack of trust that we have in TMOs. Then again it might make it worse!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Y Offline
    Y Offline
    Yeahtheboys
    wrote on last edited by
    #134

    His hand is passed the ball which indicates that the ball has already been put down..... after he puts the ball down ofc his hand is separated

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    wrote on last edited by Higgins
    #135

    The tackle is over the top of the shoulder thus probably should be a penalty try anyway.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Chiefs v Reds
Rugby Matches
chiefsreds
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.