Why this feels different...
-
-
-
@Canerbry said in Why this feels different...:
@Tim They also targeted Beauden for the same thing which was equally successful.
Neither Richie M, nor Beauden Barrett has good games on defence.
Suspect that was a lot to do with problems in the defensive pattern and the fact we got spanked at the breakdown.
-
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Why this feels different...:
What doesn’t feel different are the “reasons” for the loss being made on this forum.
Rewind 12 years ago and you could replay many of the same tag lines being put out last night and today with those following the France loss.
Forward pass aside, our tactics in the 2nd half in 07 were baffling and frustrating. Heard that today.
We missed experience - tick.
Leadership went missing and not just from the captain - tick.
Arrogance from coaches - I recall many saying Henry was so focused on the 2 AB XVs in 2006 that we never settled on one.
Strange selections leading in - Nonu and Weepu missing, Toeava in.
But Ritchie was at the START of his AB captaincy...
-
@canefan said in Why this feels different...:
@Bones said in Why this feels different...:
@canefan it was basically anti game plan. I think the state of the lineout is probably an apt description for the performance. Pathetic execution and appalling accuracy.
The plan was there, the selection was fine.
It was like all of the lessons we learned from 2007, with the senior player group and shared responsibility, were ignored. When the game went against us we couldn't right the ship
What usually happens is the guys who learned the lessons retire and the next generation need to learn them for themselves. Just wish it didn't have to be in RWC knock outs!
-
2007 hurt a lot more. We had an absolutely superb set of players in the squad that year:
-
@sparky said in Why this feels different...:
2007 hurt a lot more. We had an absolutely superb set of players in the squad that year:
If there was a squad that was a lay down misère to win the RWC, it was that. Easily the most skillful squad I've seen assembled at a RWC. The rugby they played from France in 2004 to the tournament was a joy to watch.
-
This is not even in the same universe as those losses. ‘95 - 2007 losses were devestating , all of them, never saw them coming. Even in hindsight the French losses still feel awful. ‘91 the previous games were underwhelming and injuries/selections in the backs definitely put a question mark pre game. This one hurt mainly because there generally seemed to be a real turn going on with selections and wins particularly over Australia/SA/ Ireland and that really built my hopes up perhaps a little like 2003 but it was always clear that this England team posed a real threat. Looking at the whole picture when you consider the loss of our legends in 2015 and the continuing player and coach drain New Zealand still punches massively above its weight, but with each success it only raises the expectation ever higher which is probably where I was, but never the gut punch of those other losses.
-
-
For me personally, it feels different because I always suspected it could happen.
Going into this world cup I felt any of SA, England, Ireland Wales or NZ could take this. On their day any of those teams could beat any of the others. We just have not had the consistency in our performances of late.
I won't deny the way we took care of Ireland gave me hope. But after the first 20 minutes against England I had already come back down to earth and realised that while we have a good team. We are not as totally dominant as we once were.
And you know what? I am okay with that. No one stays at the top forever. We went 24 years between drinks with the world cup. We will be back.
-
From a football angle, this one feels so much like 03 to me ,
Before the tournament starts there were hints we might be a bit flaky ,
Seemed to be an over emphasis on Attack and a lack on forward play ,
A convincing quarter final made us feel at ease,
then comes the semi where we get smashed in the forwards and our attack barely gets going due to it
-
I'm all chill about the result. It appears a lot of people are. No one really talking about it in the office.
I think I needed this result as Rugby was starting to get a bit blah for me with a turgid Super Rugby, a rubbish NPC format and us mostly winning all the time.
I said at the beginning of the year I would have a Cricket WC over a Rugby WC. The Cricket WC stung while I haven't really given this a second thought.
Will I watch the 3rd playoff? Prolly not. Will I watch the final? Prolly not too.
I am amped for the England cricket tour though!
-
-
@MajorRage said in Why this feels different...:
The more I think about it, the more I think I’m cool with it as we still did better than Oz ....
and Ireland
-
@Tim in that article:
Perhaps the quality of the New Zealand performance against Ireland ultimately contributed to their demise by highlighting the critical component parts of New Zealand's game that England would need to match. They certainly met the challenge with a clarity that stunned.
I think alot of the good we did against Ireland was missing v England, and nor just because they didnt allow it, was more we appeared to change the point of attack from the success v Ireland.
V Ireland we had runners take it up and pop to a runner right there (as England did duccessfully to us) which was in part a way to blunt the effectiveness of the rush defence.
V England, as pointed out by others, we rarely did this, we had the pop runner there but instead we passed behind him to another ball runner who was deeper, and England seemed to know it was coming (perfect example was Underhill on Read) catching us well behind the mainline.
2007 Rugby World Cup squads - Wikipedia
