• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

TV Serieseseses

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
13.2k Posts 132 Posters 2.2m Views
TV Serieseseses
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #12208

    @Catogrande said in TV Serieseseses:

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Tim said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse The team of writers the show employs could make a few modifications for the better?

    Yeah - okay, so I'm up to episode 4, and more-and-more seeing why people are annoyed at the ridiculosity.
    But... I still hold that it is staying extremely true to the source material... particularly in style - and I think that remains part of the charm.

    Imagine if they just loosely based it on the books, and people were whinging "But Reacher is supposed to be an imposing semi-autistic giant, not a charming midget!"
    <insert gif of Tom Cruise with shit-eating grin>

    They could keep the source material and just tighten up the script. Imagine Alan Ritchson in the first Reacher movie - that's what the series should be aspiring to.

    Having said that, it still has its redeeming features. Eg: From eight minutes in episode six...

    That’s either extreme violence or Dixon’s tits. I shall re-watch either way.

    My time to shine. On a lark I bought Reacher’s big bro’s setworn suit and all the costume departments’ lingerie seconds from S1 off auction.

    Missus’ flabber was well and truly ghasted as Smuts waltzed downstairs and hulked the suit (amazing what those film boffins can do with the magic of perspective.) Surprisingly, my growls that Big Joe always has little Jack Reacher’s number were met with first mystification, then mirth.

    The lingerie remains untouched. Probably should’ve got her to watch the show first.

    MN5M S 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Smuts on last edited by
    #12209

    @Smuts said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Catogrande said in TV Serieseseses:

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Tim said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse The team of writers the show employs could make a few modifications for the better?

    Yeah - okay, so I'm up to episode 4, and more-and-more seeing why people are annoyed at the ridiculosity.
    But... I still hold that it is staying extremely true to the source material... particularly in style - and I think that remains part of the charm.

    Imagine if they just loosely based it on the books, and people were whinging "But Reacher is supposed to be an imposing semi-autistic giant, not a charming midget!"
    <insert gif of Tom Cruise with shit-eating grin>

    They could keep the source material and just tighten up the script. Imagine Alan Ritchson in the first Reacher movie - that's what the series should be aspiring to.

    Having said that, it still has its redeeming features. Eg: From eight minutes in episode six...

    That’s either extreme violence or Dixon’s tits. I shall re-watch either way.

    My time to shine. On a lark I bought Reacher’s big bro’s setworn suit and all the costume departments’ lingerie seconds from S1 off auction.

    Missus’ flabber was well and truly ghasted as Smuts waltzed downstairs and hulked the suit (amazing what those film boffins can do with the magic of perspective.) Surprisingly, my growls that Big Joe always has little Jack Reacher’s number were met with first mystification, then mirth.

    The lingerie remains untouched. Probably should’ve got her to watch the show first.

    It’s early in the year I know but I highly doubt we’re gonna get a post more fucked up than this anytime soon

    SmutsS 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #12210

    True Detective: Night Country

    True Detective (TV Series 2014– ) ⭐ 8.9 | Crime, Drama, Mystery

    True Detective (TV Series 2014– ) ⭐ 8.9 | Crime, Drama, Mystery

    1h | TV-MA

    Strong Fortitude and 30 Days of Night vibe from the opener.

    Plus throw in any number of shows recently that have highlighted the fate, futility & fatality of the indigenous.

    Going to be interesting.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    scribe
    replied to Smuts on last edited by
    #12211

    @Smuts said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Catogrande said in TV Serieseseses:

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Tim said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse The team of writers the show employs could make a few modifications for the better?

    Yeah - okay, so I'm up to episode 4, and more-and-more seeing why people are annoyed at the ridiculosity.
    But... I still hold that it is staying extremely true to the source material... particularly in style - and I think that remains part of the charm.

    Imagine if they just loosely based it on the books, and people were whinging "But Reacher is supposed to be an imposing semi-autistic giant, not a charming midget!"
    <insert gif of Tom Cruise with shit-eating grin>

    They could keep the source material and just tighten up the script. Imagine Alan Ritchson in the first Reacher movie - that's what the series should be aspiring to.

    Having said that, it still has its redeeming features. Eg: From eight minutes in episode six...

    That’s either extreme violence or Dixon’s tits. I shall re-watch either way.

    My time to shine. On a lark I bought Reacher’s big bro’s setworn suit and all the costume departments’ lingerie seconds from S1 off auction.

    Missus’ flabber was well and truly ghasted as Smuts waltzed downstairs and hulked the suit (amazing what those film boffins can do with the magic of perspective.) Surprisingly, my growls that Big Joe always has little Jack Reacher’s number were met with first mystification, then mirth.

    The lingerie remains untouched. Probably should’ve got her to watch the show first.

    Chapeau! This place never ceases to amaze me.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #12212

    @MN5 said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Smuts said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Catogrande said in TV Serieseseses:

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Tim said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse The team of writers the show employs could make a few modifications for the better?

    Yeah - okay, so I'm up to episode 4, and more-and-more seeing why people are annoyed at the ridiculosity.
    But... I still hold that it is staying extremely true to the source material... particularly in style - and I think that remains part of the charm.

    Imagine if they just loosely based it on the books, and people were whinging "But Reacher is supposed to be an imposing semi-autistic giant, not a charming midget!"
    <insert gif of Tom Cruise with shit-eating grin>

    They could keep the source material and just tighten up the script. Imagine Alan Ritchson in the first Reacher movie - that's what the series should be aspiring to.

    Having said that, it still has its redeeming features. Eg: From eight minutes in episode six...

    That’s either extreme violence or Dixon’s tits. I shall re-watch either way.

    My time to shine. On a lark I bought Reacher’s big bro’s setworn suit and all the costume departments’ lingerie seconds from S1 off auction.

    Missus’ flabber was well and truly ghasted as Smuts waltzed downstairs and hulked the suit (amazing what those film boffins can do with the magic of perspective.) Surprisingly, my growls that Big Joe always has little Jack Reacher’s number were met with first mystification, then mirth.

    The lingerie remains untouched. Probably should’ve got her to watch the show first.

    It’s early in the year I know but I highly doubt we’re gonna get a post more fucked up than this anytime soon

    Someone’s bound to suggest Scotland has a shot at winning the 6 Nations

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Smuts on last edited by
    #12213

    @Smuts said in TV Serieseseses:

    @MN5 said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Smuts said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Catogrande said in TV Serieseseses:

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Tim said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse The team of writers the show employs could make a few modifications for the better?

    Yeah - okay, so I'm up to episode 4, and more-and-more seeing why people are annoyed at the ridiculosity.
    But... I still hold that it is staying extremely true to the source material... particularly in style - and I think that remains part of the charm.

    Imagine if they just loosely based it on the books, and people were whinging "But Reacher is supposed to be an imposing semi-autistic giant, not a charming midget!"
    <insert gif of Tom Cruise with shit-eating grin>

    They could keep the source material and just tighten up the script. Imagine Alan Ritchson in the first Reacher movie - that's what the series should be aspiring to.

    Having said that, it still has its redeeming features. Eg: From eight minutes in episode six...

    That’s either extreme violence or Dixon’s tits. I shall re-watch either way.

    My time to shine. On a lark I bought Reacher’s big bro’s setworn suit and all the costume departments’ lingerie seconds from S1 off auction.

    Missus’ flabber was well and truly ghasted as Smuts waltzed downstairs and hulked the suit (amazing what those film boffins can do with the magic of perspective.) Surprisingly, my growls that Big Joe always has little Jack Reacher’s number were met with first mystification, then mirth.

    The lingerie remains untouched. Probably should’ve got her to watch the show first.

    It’s early in the year I know but I highly doubt we’re gonna get a post more fucked up than this anytime soon

    Someone’s bound to suggest Scotland has a shot at winning the 6 Nations

    EXTREMELY well played

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    wrote on last edited by
    #12214

    Reacher series 2 finale.

    Utter dross

    B TimT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #12215

    @Victor-Meldrew said in TV Serieseseses:

    Reacher series 2 finale.

    Utter dross

    Look I enjoyed the series for what it was but waiting a week for that finale to drop fits your summary unfortunately

    keeping in the theme of the show probably needed two extra scenes. One where Reacher uses that knife to remove Patrick’s eyeball, while delivering the one liner “an eye for an eye”. Compulsory second scene of Dixon (topless) riding Reacher before him saying, “sorry I’ve got to go, I’m going to miss my bus”

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #12216

    @Victor-Meldrew

    Talk about padding it out ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #12217

    Reacher season two suffers from nothing other than poor writing. It doesn't take a literary genius to get Dixon in skimpy clothing more often.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #12218

    In case you're wondering if the new (season four) True Detective is worth watching; based on episode one I say definitely.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #12219

    @antipodean

    Starting that tonite. You're not the only one giving it good reviews

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #12220

    So couple of so episodes into Reacher 2 and have a question.

    There seems to have been several references to Dixon's tits and no mention of Neagley's, which appear much more impressive. Why?

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #12221

    @Bones

    She doesn’t like to be touched and will break your cock off. Therefore redundant.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #12222

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    Reacher season two suffers from nothing other than poor writing. It doesn't take a literary genius to get Dixon in skimpy clothing more often.

    Agreed. A good story badly told. Second point is obviously right but is a problem unconfined to Reacher S2.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #12223

    @Catogrande she can try

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #12224

    @Bones There is no "try". Only "do".

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    wrote on last edited by
    #12225

    De do do do, de da da da
    Is all Bones can say to you
    De do do do, de da da da
    after Neagley makes him spew
    De do do do, de da da da
    Is all Bones can say to you
    De do do do, de da da da
    he’s dickless now that much is true

    Bones’ lust ended in castration
    Big words to thank for nullofication
    Words he screamed during emasculation
    Fran Neagley yanking his transmission
    Catograndes’ eloquence betrayed you
    Their logic tied you up as she amputates you

    De do do do, de da da da
    Is all Bones can say to you

    Apologies to Mr. Sting (and everyone else except the bored’s newest eunuch, the ironically named @Bones )

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #12226

    The above post has confused the hell out of me as I'm avoiding the Reacher chat as I have an episode to go.

    Anyway, when @MiketheSnow did his list of best shows of 2023 I started doing one, promptly forgot and have now refound the list, so have completed it as I'm procrastinating at work.

    NB: This is a list if shows I watched in 2023 so may include shows released other years. Also, I went a bit crazy and made some other categories. And as I have the memory of a fish I've probably forgotten some that I really enjoyed too.

    Top 10 (excluding sitcoms, in no particular order aside from the top 3)
    Reservation Dogs
    The Bear
    Slow Horses
    Dark Winds
    Paper Girls
    Broadchurch
    For All Mankind
    The Marvellous Mrs Maisal
    Rogue Heroes
    My Name

    Just missed out on Top 10
    A Spy Among Friends
    Fauda - last season not as good as previous seasons, balanced out by a half Jew/half Arab hottie added to the cast.
    Deutschland series - 83 on it's own would be top 10.
    Heels
    Blackbird
    Beef
    Silo
    Jury Duty

    Top Sitcoms-ish
    Upload
    Shrinking
    Ted Lasso
    Only Murderers in the Building
    The Afterparty
    What We Do In the Shadows
    Colin from Accounts

    Popcorn fun, switch of your brain late at night
    The Night Agent
    Arnold show
    The Diplomat
    The Lincoln Lawyer
    Who’s Erin Carter

    Don’t believe the hype
    Succession: Everyone raved on about "that" episode. Yeah, didn't live up to the hype. The show is a decent watch, but way overhyped.

    Biggest disappointment
    Justified - City Primeval

    Biggest surprise
    Netflix docos - Beckham, Arnold, Sly, WWII in colour, the holocaust one (camp guard on trial in the 80s) that come back so I could finish it - but can't remember the name of it.

    Worst Show
    Echo 3: Apple has a bunch of the good shows - and then this rubbish.

    KruseK taniwharugbyT MN5M 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #12227

    @Nepia said in TV Serieseseses:

    The above post has confused the hell out of me as I'm avoiding the Reacher chat as I have an episode to go.

    Trust me - it's confused the hell out of everybody

    Top 10 (excluding sitcoms, in no particular order aside from the top 3)
    Reservation Dogs

    ??? I've only watched S01 of Reservation Dogs - does it take even more of a swerve in style than Barry - to full-on drama or thriller?

    Succession: Everyone raved on about "that" episode.

    Which episode? (Curious - I don't recall any excessive hype over any single episode... but just hype over the entire thing, which not everybody bought into, but personally - I really enjoyed/appreciated the whole thing)

    Broadchurch

    Brit or seppo?

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0

TV Serieseseses
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.