The Silver Fern

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Users
    • Tipping
    • Thread Topics
    • Highlights
    • Team Sheets
    • NPC Results
    • Upvote Leaderboard
        • TSF
        • Home Page
        • Browse Posts
        • Tipping
        • Tipping Home
        • Submit Your Tips
        • Current Tips
          Rugby Info
        • Team Sheets
        • Highlights
        • Rugby Results
        • AB Results
        • SR Results
        • NPC Results
          Forum Links
        • Leaderboard
        • Popular Topics
        • Topic Tags

    New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday

    Sports Talk
    cricket
    12
    16
    1236
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Hooroo
      Hooroo last edited by Duluth

      https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket/97278858/smaller-bats-fewer-drs-calls-and-player-send-offs-in-new-icc-playing-conditions

      I don't hate one of them. Love the 80 over refresh elimination!!

      nzzp 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
      • nzzp
        nzzp @Hooroo last edited by

        @hooroo Good work, I agree. All look positive, and I like the DRS changes

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Paekakboyz
          Paekakboyz last edited by

          Really like those - but wonder if any ump will have the stones to send someone off. Do we know of any recent instances that would have led to a send off?

          That deliberate front foot no ball (in the Windies 20/20 comp?) would be a good example of no more bowling in that innings.

          Good to see the bat sizes reigned in also - that was starting to get a bit out of hand.

          Hooroo 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Rapido
            Rapido last edited by

            Agree, all positive changes.

            The bat size rule isn't really "smaller bats". They are still huge, 40mm edges. It's just stopping them getting any bigger.

            Id like that tweaked thinner, but one step at a time.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Crucial
              Crucial last edited by

              Looks like a set of anti Davey Dumb Dumb rules.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • Chris B.
                Chris B. last edited by

                Yeah - all look good. Especially like the rule about bouncing bats. I thought it was crazy that people who had grounded their bats were being given run out because the bat had bounced up. That's not bad play or an error, that's bad luck.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Hooroo
                  Hooroo @Paekakboyz last edited by

                  @paekakboyz said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                  Really like those - but wonder if any ump will have the stones to send someone off. Do we know of any recent instances that would have led to a send off?

                  That deliberate front foot no ball (in the Windies 20/20 comp?) would be a good example of no more bowling in that innings.

                  Good to see the bat sizes reigned in also - that was starting to get a bit out of hand.

                  Can you help me out with this? I don't understand why they would intentially bowl a front foot no ball??

                  dogmeat Duluth Chris B. 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dogmeat
                    dogmeat @Hooroo last edited by

                    @hooroo accelerate the run rate to contrive a declaration?

                    Hooroo 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Hooroo
                      Hooroo @dogmeat last edited by

                      @dogmeat said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                      @hooroo accelerate the run rate to contrive a declaration?

                      I like that but how in 20/20?

                      Snowy 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Snowy
                        Snowy @Hooroo last edited by

                        @hooroo said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                        @dogmeat said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                        @hooroo accelerate the run rate to contrive a declaration?

                        I like that but how in 20/20?

                        Basically it was spite I think - although he denies that it was deliberate. Could sort of understand if there was cash for fastest hundred or something.

                        https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket/96496084/kieron-pollard-slammed-for-noball-that-denied-opponent-evin-lewis-chance-at-century

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • Duluth
                          Duluth @Hooroo last edited by

                          @hooroo

                          Pollard was accused of bowling one to prevent a player getting a century (the batting team needed one more for a win)

                          But removing a bowler from an attack wouldn't help in that situation..

                          Intimidation maybe?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • Chris B.
                            Chris B. @Hooroo last edited by

                            @hooroo said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                            @paekakboyz said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                            Really like those - but wonder if any ump will have the stones to send someone off. Do we know of any recent instances that would have led to a send off?

                            That deliberate front foot no ball (in the Windies 20/20 comp?) would be a good example of no more bowling in that innings.

                            Good to see the bat sizes reigned in also - that was starting to get a bit out of hand.

                            Can you help me out with this? I don't understand why they would intentially bowl a front foot no ball??

                            Can't recall who Curtly Ambrose (I think) was bowling to, but the batsman charged him and got a warning - "If you don't stay behind your line, I won't stay behind mine!"

                            Siam 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • Siam
                              Siam @Chris B. last edited by

                              @chris-b said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                              @hooroo said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                              @paekakboyz said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                              Really like those - but wonder if any ump will have the stones to send someone off. Do we know of any recent instances that would have led to a send off?

                              That deliberate front foot no ball (in the Windies 20/20 comp?) would be a good example of no more bowling in that innings.

                              Good to see the bat sizes reigned in also - that was starting to get a bit out of hand.

                              Can you help me out with this? I don't understand why they would intentially bowl a front foot no ball??

                              Can't recall who Curtly Ambrose (I think) was bowling to, but the batsman charged him and got a warning - "If you don't stay behind your line, I won't stay behind mine!"

                              Paddy batch in that world cup, so the story goes

                              G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • barbarian
                                barbarian last edited by

                                I applaud the umpire who would have the stones to show Curtly a yellow card at that point...

                                Paekakboyz 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                • Paekakboyz
                                  Paekakboyz @barbarian last edited by

                                  @barbarian you only do it once!!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • G
                                    Godder @Siam last edited by

                                    @siam said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                                    @chris-b said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                                    @hooroo said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                                    @paekakboyz said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:

                                    Really like those - but wonder if any ump will have the stones to send someone off. Do we know of any recent instances that would have led to a send off?

                                    That deliberate front foot no ball (in the Windies 20/20 comp?) would be a good example of no more bowling in that innings.

                                    Good to see the bat sizes reigned in also - that was starting to get a bit out of hand.

                                    Can you help me out with this? I don't understand why they would intentially bowl a front foot no ball??

                                    Can't recall who Curtly Ambrose (I think) was bowling to, but the batsman charged him and got a warning - "If you don't stay behind your line, I won't stay behind mine!"

                                    Paddy batch in that world cup, so the story goes

                                    The man who put Malcolm Marshall over Extra Cover for 6... Doubt he would have had any fear at all!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post