• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

QF - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bophawkesbay
128 Posts 32 Posters 5.0k Views
QF - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Away
    S Away
    SouthernMann
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #9

    @Nepia said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @MN5 said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @Nepia said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @SouthernMann said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    He's too old... Has to be a 24 year old

    Now you've ruined my week.

    Are you telling me the shame of being from a Union who wrecked the Shield hadn’t done that already ?

    How DARE you !

    Quite frankly I'm still happy as Larry at the win and equally quite frankly all the moralising going on in the thread is keeping me entertained.

    @SouthernMann Fingers crossed it's the replacement forward, and not the playmaker.

    Another option is a very influential forward. Bloody talented player.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    We have five 24-year olds in the squad. All of them were in Wellington, although one didn't play.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SmudgeS Offline
    SmudgeS Offline
    Smudge
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #11

    @Nepia said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @SouthernMann said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    So will Hawke's be without a playmaker, loose forward or replacement forward? https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/499223/hawke-s-bay-rugby-union-player-charged-with-drink-driving

    Hopefully a Tiatia.

    He had his one diamonds this weekend, he'll be back to rocks again on Sunday.

    I'm just shocked you're trying not to pin this on Chris Eaton, even if he's retired.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #12

    @Stargazer said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    We have five 24-year olds in the squad. All of them were in Wellington, although one didn't play.

    Was he driving home early to beat the traffic ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_aus
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Can we update the thread heading please.

    The Bay vs The Ranfurly Shields holders

    SmudgeS M boobooB sparkyS 4 Replies Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to SouthernMann on last edited by
    #14

    @SouthernMann said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @Nepia said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @MN5 said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @Nepia said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @SouthernMann said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    He's too old... Has to be a 24 year old

    Now you've ruined my week.

    Are you telling me the shame of being from a Union who wrecked the Shield hadn’t done that already ?

    How DARE you !

    Quite frankly I'm still happy as Larry at the win and equally quite frankly all the moralising going on in the thread is keeping me entertained.

    @SouthernMann Fingers crossed it's the replacement forward, and not the playmaker.

    Another option is a very influential forward. Bloody talented player.

    I think we can cover him ok in comparison to the playmaker.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Smudge on last edited by
    #15

    @Smudge said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @Nepia said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @SouthernMann said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    So will Hawke's be without a playmaker, loose forward or replacement forward? https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/499223/hawke-s-bay-rugby-union-player-charged-with-drink-driving

    Hopefully a Tiatia.

    He had his one diamonds this weekend, he'll be back to rocks again on Sunday.

    I'm just shocked you're trying not to pin this on Chris Eaton, even if he's retired.

    TBF, if he was still playing we'd likely be able to pin all of it on him. 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SmudgeS Offline
    SmudgeS Offline
    Smudge
    replied to Magpie_in_aus on last edited by
    #16

    @Magpie_in_aus said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    Can we update the thread heading please.

    The Bay vs The Ranfurly Shields holders

    I've asked the mods.

    They said no.

    1 Reply Last reply
    11
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Magpie_in_aus on last edited by
    #17

    @Magpie_in_aus said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    Can we update the thread heading please.

    The Bay vs The Ranfurly Shields holders

    I think it's perfectly obvious that the prison striped gang are entirely unable to hold onto the shield.

    Magpie_in_ausM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    I understand that the shield is actually to be held in Wellington for the summer

    So HB aren't holding shit

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    BOP Vs Waikato? Very confusing

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_aus
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #20

    @Machpants hold onto the shields*

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Magpie_in_aus on last edited by
    #21

    @Magpie_in_aus said in Qtr Final 4 - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    Can we update the thread heading please.

    The Bay vs The Ranfurly Shields holders

    That wouldn't be entirely accurate would it?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    These scumbags had the Shield win revoked yet?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Was really surprised to see the amount of players the Bay had back against Ta$man at the end of storm week. Hoping the main league type story of this week keeps the focus off the rugby to help prep for the QF.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    I think the Shield saga makes this game even harder to read now. Think we will get one of the extremes... Hawkes may come out firing with a big siege mentality from the week they're going through. Or it may all be too big a distraction if key players are out? I'm glad I don't have to tip this game...

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #25
    Oct 3, 2023

    Hawke's Bay player facing charge available to play quarter-final

    Hawke's Bay player facing charge available to play quarter-final

    Broken Ranfurly Shield controversy rumbles on, with the union's chief executive stating today that no disciplinary measures will happen before weekend.

    This seems bizarre to me. Surely it isn't a matter of an employment issue, and rather a, you are dropped for partying way too hard?

    taniwharugbyT StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to frugby on last edited by taniwharugby
    #26

    @frugby I guess it makes it very hard for them to maintain name suppression (employment disciplinary issue) and at the same time, drop a player for the quarter...guess easier to drag heels, deal internally.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #27

    @frugby RTS wasn't dropped by Auckland Rugby either after "partying way too hard" and subsequently being charged with drink-driving. And that even didn't make the media AFAIK.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #28

    @Stargazer said in QF - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers:

    @frugby RTS wasn't dropped by Auckland Rugby either after "partying way too hard" and subsequently being charged with drink-driving. And that even didn't make the media AFAIK.

    Wasn't that not during the season though (not excusing the behaviour, but think that is the main point of concern?)

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0

QF - The Bay v Coke Snorting, Historical Artefact Wreckers
Rugby Matches
bophawkesbay
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.