Springboks v Wallabies
-
-
Rugby Australia can't afford to pay Cheika out.
They can't afford to hire a new coach.
Neither situation would improve the player pool, coaching pool, or pathways.
Welcome to Australian Rugby.Of course, picking Beale at 10 again was always going to work out one way.
I haven't seen the game. Why bother?
-
-
@kiwimurph said in Springboks v Wallabies:
@jegga Boks won 23-12. Aussies lurch from one poor performance to another.
Sorry mate , I was trolling/gloating.
-
Krusty blaming the ref is not unusual I guess
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12134729
-
-
@jegga said in Springboks v Wallabies:
Krusty blaming the ref is not unusual I guess
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12134729
Another bullshit article.
Here are Cheikas words:
I keep being asked the same question every week," he said after the 11 point loss.
"It depends if you want to cry about it and sook or get on with the improvements we definitely made in this test.
"I think there's plenty of positives. The things we need to improve on is our ability to finish.
"We held our nerve really well, fought our way back into the game. I think we dominated the physical contest enough but we were still able to manufacture a lot of opportunities."
All standard losing professional coach cliches.
The rest of the article is quotes from a fellow journalist at another newspaper, from another substanceless opinion piece
-
@siam said in Springboks v Wallabies:
Here are Cheikas words:
I keep being asked the same question every week," he said after the 11 point loss.Herald are pathetic, they ran a headline that said Ledesma was scathing of our play or something...in reality all he said was he was surprised they werent more focussed and accurate or similar.
-
@taniwharugby said in Springboks v Wallabies:
@siam said in Springboks v Wallabies:
Here are Cheikas words:
I keep being asked the same question every week," he said after the 11 point loss.Herald are pathetic, they ran a headline that said Ledesma was scathing of our play or something...in reality all he said was he was surprised they werent more focussed and accurate or similar.
I saw that too, a joke .
-
@siam said in Springboks v Wallabies:
@jegga said in Springboks v Wallabies:
Krusty blaming the ref is not unusual I guess
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12134729
Another bullshit article.
Here are Cheikas words:
I keep being asked the same question every week," he said after the 11 point loss.
"It depends if you want to cry about it and sook or get on with the improvements we definitely made in this test.
"I think there's plenty of positives. The things we need to improve on is our ability to finish.
"We held our nerve really well, fought our way back into the game. I think we dominated the physical contest enough but we were still able to manufacture a lot of opportunities."
All standard losing professional coach cliches.
The rest of the article is quotes from a fellow journalist at another newspaper, from another substanceless opinion piece
The trouble is that most of those cliched answers are actually correct. Just that he always seems to make excuses for his responsibilities by laying blame at the players' door.
I have a slight bit of sympathy in that he is trying to make a silk purse from a kangaroo's nutsack and his players simply don't have the skill levels to execute therefore he actually does well in using their athletic abilities to compete (if not win). -
Wallabies no longer seem to produce 'thinking' backs, which gave them an edge in parts of the 80s/90s.
Throw Lynagh in his prime into that team on Saturday and I think they go close. Add Gregan/Farr Jones and Larkham/Horan and they win for me. Beale is mercurial but to me doen't have what it takes at 10. Foley a better game manager, but wooden.
Contrast Boks, where Pollard is growing into a very good operator and helps a lot of things to happen.
