-
@TeWaio Cheers, yep that's about where I sit on the situation which obviously makes me an evil rich corporate climate change denier in certain circles (normally with a few additional 'ist' descriptor words for good measure). Have you read anything of Bjorn Lomborg? Seems to make a lot of sense to me. The 90% reduction in mortality from climate events in the last 100 years being a good example of where a good economy saves lives and destroying such an economy to stop climate change would likely cost significantly more lives.
-
@mariner4life said in Climate Change #3 & Other Environmental Issues:
@TeWaio god that is beautifully written.
Nobody can even muster a response in the most controversial thread on the Fern, which has to be a first.
-
@mariner4life @No-Quarter thanks fellas
@Rembrandt have heard of Bjorn Lomborg quite a bit but never got round to reading any of his stuff, will do so now, thanks
-
@TeWaio said in Climate Change #3 & Other Environmental Issues:
@mariner4life @No-Quarter thanks fellas
@Rembrandt have heard of Bjorn Lomborg quite a bit but never got round to reading any of his stuff, will do so now, thanks
Bjorn is pretty good. He's very pragmatic, very good with the numbers. Must be hard to keep beating the drum when nobody seeks to listen
-
@TeWaio I guess my only argument is how do we know if that 20% reduction is worth it or not? By the time it happens it maybe too late.
The frustration for me is we know fossil fuels are bad and are causing issues, we know agriculture, in particular meat and dairy contribute heavily. We have the technology and knowledge now to make dramatic changes in these areas which is highly likely going to slow warming. Some govts are dragging their heels and allowing corporate giants to dictate the message.
I haven't lived in NZ for a long time but from the outside it appears the govt is at least trying. The Australian Govt on the other hand seems to favour jobs, economic growth and wealth ahead of the environment and long term outcomes. The fact we allowed a giant coal mine in ecologically important bush so a foreign company can profit tells you were we are at here.
-
@chimoaus said in Climate Change #3 & Other Environmental Issues:
@TeWaio I guess my only argument is how do we know if that 20% reduction is worth it or not? By the time it happens it maybe too late.
The frustration for me is we know fossil fuels are bad and are causing issues, we know agriculture, in particular meat and dairy contribute heavily. We have the technology and knowledge now to make dramatic changes in these areas which is highly likely going to slow warming. Some govts are dragging their heels and allowing corporate giants to dictate the message.
I haven't lived in NZ for a long time but from the outside it appears the govt is at least trying. The Australian Govt on the other hand seems to favour jobs, economic growth and wealth ahead of the environment and long term outcomes. The fact we allowed a giant coal mine in ecologically important bush so a foreign company can profit tells you were we are at here.
I think any govt that doesnt favour jobs, economic growth and wealth is failing not only it citizens but also its citizens abilities to provide solutions to issues. Govts never solve anything of importance. They wreck innovation far more than they help it. About the only time a got ever helps innovation is if they start a war.
I think it is incredibly sad that so many people see wealth economic growth and jobs as some sort of negative, and if not a negative then running counter to the environment.
The main issue is that the anti capitalists green movement refuse to see it as a personal movement, they do not seriously promote thier cause by leading by example, they preach with empty words and virtue signalling. A climate activist ranting at a rally holding an iPhone is no different to a pastor at a church giving a sermon with a porn magazine tucked under his arm.
The solutions the climate activists promote are personal though, they would really REALLY suck at a personal level, less jobs, rampant poverty and deprivation (if you think different then do some research on what happens without economic growth). The poorest in society would be put through hell, homeless, jobless, not being able to support families,diseases and health systems would collapse. Economic growth is and always has been vital.
The climate activists act like the govt will solve everything and somehow make the lack of economic growth just all work... they wont. They will make it worse. They refuse to make meaningful personal sacrifice as at an instinctual level they know it sucks., but they are just to indoctrinated to understand.
I dont believe their is much of a problem and every year I am proven right as prediction after prediction fails, and if I am proven wrong... what will happen.... nothing as bad as the solution that some people are proposing to avoid it.
As for the NZ govt, they are virtue signalling numpties who will harm the poor of NZ as they attempt to tank our economy , the ones that will be crushed by a strangled economy.... the young and the poor. The young think they have it tough now.... do some research on what is was like to have no money during the great depression and then magnify it.@chimoaus Ok.. so lets say we bow down before the activists and remove meat and dairy form our economy. What replaces it? We have a market for those products. Someone else will take the market share as it wont disappear, just be re-alloacted. So that wont help the environment on a global scale. But then what does NZ do to replace those jobs, industry and export earnings? Who do you rely on to invest and make these changes? The govt? Farmers? At whose cost? Is there a massive global demand for Kale and other veggies tat we could fill? And if so why would they not do it regardless of climate 'emergency'? Because it doesnt make economic sense! Anyone who knows anything about money knows you dont give away all your market share and customers to a competitor for free, then at great expense start up a new business with unknown demand. Yet that is what people are demanding at a national level in NZ.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback
Financial literacy should be a compulsory subject in High School.
Real world stuff.This way young people can make an informed and balanced decision.
The Green message is shoved down students' throats, so I don't see why students cannot be taught the real world consequences of economies failing. As it stands, in today's youth, GDP growth etc. are nothing more than abstract numbers for stuffy bankers and businessmen.
I suspect the Greenies won't be a fan of my proposal.
-
-
Further: Sydney is supposed to reach 37C on Tuesday. Strong winds. Fire rating is "Catastrophic".
Second week of November.
Fark.
Edit: schools within 20 minutes of my house are closing Tuesday due to the danger. That level of caution is unprecedented.
I'm more than 30 minutes drive from the blue mountains where the worst fires have historically been.
-
@NTA said in Climate Change #3 & Other Environmental Issues:
Further: Sydney is supposed to reach 37C on Tuesday. Strong winds. Fire rating is "Catastrophic".
Second week of November.
Fark.
Edit: schools within 20 minutes of my house are closing Tuesday due to the danger. That level of caution is unprecedented.
I'm more than 30 minutes drive from the blue mountains where the worst fires have historically been.
That sucks. I was going to like your post, but seemed inappropriate.
-
@NTA said in Climate Change #3 & Other Environmental Issues:
It's fucking terrifying but some of the tech available is pretty cool.
That’s awful. My neighbor is a firefighter and might be heading over . He has been to fires in ACT and NSW before but since then he’s been trained to use drones to track the fires .
-
@jegga said in Climate Change #3 & Other Environmental Issues:
That’s awful. My neighbor is a firefighter and might be heading over . He has been to fires in ACT and NSW before but since then he’s been trained to use drones to track the fires .
It would be interesting to discuss the differences he sees in fires in NZ versus other places. Terrain would be a huge challenge over there I imagine - hence the drones.
I once had charcoaled gum leaves falling in my back yard from a particularly bad fire season in the Blue Mountains 7 or 8 years go, meaning the wind was blowing charred matter 25 kilometres over an elevation drop of roughly 150m at the nearest point.
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Climate Change #3 & Other Environmental Issues:
That sucks. I was going to like your post, but seemed inappropriate.
It is sucky. For the Greater Sydney Basin itself to be affected - directly - is certainly something new in my 20ish years living here.
Fire map for NSW is here. Stupidly they don't cross the border into QLD on this map.
If you click on a given fire you get its status and size. Some of the areas (in hectares) are mind blowing.
-
@NTA said in Climate Change #3 & Other Environmental Issues:
It's fucking terrifying but some of the tech available is pretty cool.
What's astonishing is how cold it was yesterday riding in the Brindabellas.
-
@antipodean said in Climate Change #3 & Other Environmental Issues:
What's astonishing is how cold it was yesterday riding in the Brindabellas.
The variability this Spring has been crazy. Days well into the 30s followed by high teens and anything in between. Hardly spring-like.
-
@jegga said in Climate Change #3 & Other Environmental Issues:
@NTA I’ll ask him next time I see him . Being able to detect hotspots through smoke he said was huge for them .
Particularly for waterbombing. Even if you lose a $2000 drone, you can stop the fire in its tracks.
Funding for certain emergency services has been cut here the last few years and people are genuinely concerned about summer. NSW Fire and Rescue only has 1 purpose-built water bombing aircraft I think? Whereas in the USA they've got dozens and lease them out to us like those big-arse sky crane choppers.
Ex-military Hercs can also be converted and carry a fuckton of water as well as this 737 they were trialling earlier this year - how fucking low down is this crazy US pilot?
Climate Change