Black Lives Matter
-
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
Assuming any appeal is dismissed, this guy is going to need to be in isolation for his entire prison sentence. It's effectively life over for him.
Yep. Serving and protecting might have been a better option. I don't think Floyd was endangering anyone at the time.
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
The 2nd degree charge is more debatable I guess.
I don't think it is, given what I have read. It seems more obvious than 3rd degree which is weird, as I said earlier.
-
@act-crusader said in Black Lives Matter:
Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.
Of the one person? Who the fuck instructed that jury?
-
@snowy said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
Assuming any appeal is dismissed, this guy is going to need to be in isolation for his entire prison sentence. It's effectively life over for him.
Yep. Serving and protecting might have been a better option. I don't think Floyd was endangering anyone at the time.
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
The 2nd degree charge is more debatable I guess.
I don't think it is, given what I have read. It seems more obvious than 3rd degree which is weird, as I said earlier.
Well, if you take evidence of a "depraved mind" as having "acted with reckless disregard for Floydβs life" then that's pretty hard to dismiss?
I think you can act consciously and recklessly at the same time. Reading the exerts you posted earlier, I'd think that 2nd and 3rd both appear logical
-
@snowy said in Black Lives Matter:
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
So justice is served,
Rightly or wrongly, that is the way the court saw it.
I haven't made a judgement call on the verdict. I get that you can infer I have but it's an objective statement.
My concern has never been for Chauvin. My concern is 12 months of rioting because of racism.
-
@mariner4life said in Black Lives Matter:
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
So justice is served, and Minneapolis can be riot free, right?
excellent way to look at it, well done
Is this sarcasm? If so why?
I've stated that justice has been played out, no judgement call at all. -
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
So justice is served, and Minneapolis can be riot free, right?
Everything I have read, which is the bulk of the stuff posted here, indicates to me that the 3rd degree murder and manslaughter charges are entirely appropriate. The 2nd degree charge is more debatable I guess.
Assuming any appeal is dismissed, this guy is going to need to be in isolation for his entire prison sentence. It's effectively life over for him.
None of it is debatable. It went through the court, a jury gave a verdict. That's the system. I'm not disagreeing with anything, just playing the whistle
Now, how can the rioting be eased? And the argument of was Chauvin racist is far from settled.
-
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
So justice is served, and Minneapolis can be riot free, right?
Everything I have read, which is the bulk of the stuff posted here, indicates to me that the 3rd degree murder and manslaughter charges are entirely appropriate. The 2nd degree charge is more debatable I guess.
Assuming any appeal is dismissed, this guy is going to need to be in isolation for his entire prison sentence. It's effectively life over for him.
None of it is debatable. It went through the court, a jury gave a verdict. That's the system. I'm not disagreeing with anything, just playing the whistle
Now, how can the rioting be eased? And the argument of was Chauvin racist is far from settled.
Everything is always debatable, especially on the Fern! Juries don't have 100% accuracy rates, they get shit wrong and especially in times of political inference.
Do we need to settle the "argument" of whether Chauvin was racist? Why is that relevant?
As for the rioting, I truly wish I had an answer to that. Looting and deliberate destruction of property is despicable and should be punished, even if triggered and influenced by deeper societal issues.
-
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
So justice is served, and Minneapolis can be riot free, right?
Everything I have read, which is the bulk of the stuff posted here, indicates to me that the 3rd degree murder and manslaughter charges are entirely appropriate. The 2nd degree charge is more debatable I guess.
Assuming any appeal is dismissed, this guy is going to need to be in isolation for his entire prison sentence. It's effectively life over for him.
None of it is debatable. It went through the court, a jury gave a verdict. That's the system. I'm not disagreeing with anything, just playing the whistle
Now, how can the rioting be eased? And the argument of was Chauvin racist is far from settled.
Everything is always debatable, especially on the Fern! Juries don't have 100% accuracy rates, they get shit wrong and especially in times of political inference.
Do we need to settle the "argument" of whether Chauvin was racist? Why is that relevant?
As for the rioting, I truly wish I had an answer to that. Looting and deliberate destruction of property is despicable and should be punished, even if triggered and influenced by deeper societal issues.
This is a huge issue in the US, and strong emotions generated can result in tempers flaring and a loss of control. Of course there are will always be people who will use the opportunity to raise hell
-
@canefan and there was tons of footage of legit peaceful protesters getting angry at others for looting and violence. Get a protest type event going with enough folks and some of them are going to be up to no good - irrespective of how worthy the cause or if the majority of people aren't getting violent. I don't think any level of organisational management (BLM, or whoever) is going to rein in people who are only going to rark shit up - whether that is for shits and giggles, to paint the protesters as rioters, or any other variation on those themes.
-
and I fully agree that destruction of private property as part of a riot or protest is scummy as fuck.
-
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
So justice is served, and Minneapolis can be riot free, right?
Everything I have read, which is the bulk of the stuff posted here, indicates to me that the 3rd degree murder and manslaughter charges are entirely appropriate. The 2nd degree charge is more debatable I guess.
Assuming any appeal is dismissed, this guy is going to need to be in isolation for his entire prison sentence. It's effectively life over for him.
None of it is debatable. It went through the court, a jury gave a verdict. That's the system. I'm not disagreeing with anything, just playing the whistle
Now, how can the rioting be eased? And the argument of was Chauvin racist is far from settled.
Everything is always debatable, especially on the Fern! Juries don't have 100% accuracy rates, they get shit wrong and especially in times of political inference.
Do we need to settle the "argument" of whether Chauvin was racist? Why is that relevant?
As for the rioting, I truly wish I had an answer to that. Looting and deliberate destruction of property is despicable and should be punished, even if triggered and influenced by deeper societal issues.
Yes, debatable, but like a referee or umpire's decision we've built a system on that being the final assessment, and to learn to accept that.π
I thought the "racism" of Chauvin killing a black man was the crux of blm, rioting, kneeling, corporate virtue signalling etc. Happy to be wrong on that but I figured that was the impetus for the last 12 months of mayhem.
-
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
So justice is served, and Minneapolis can be riot free, right?
Everything I have read, which is the bulk of the stuff posted here, indicates to me that the 3rd degree murder and manslaughter charges are entirely appropriate. The 2nd degree charge is more debatable I guess.
Assuming any appeal is dismissed, this guy is going to need to be in isolation for his entire prison sentence. It's effectively life over for him.
None of it is debatable. It went through the court, a jury gave a verdict. That's the system. I'm not disagreeing with anything, just playing the whistle
Now, how can the rioting be eased? And the argument of was Chauvin racist is far from settled.
Everything is always debatable, especially on the Fern! Juries don't have 100% accuracy rates, they get shit wrong and especially in times of political inference.
Do we need to settle the "argument" of whether Chauvin was racist? Why is that relevant?
As for the rioting, I truly wish I had an answer to that. Looting and deliberate destruction of property is despicable and should be punished, even if triggered and influenced by deeper societal issues.
Yes, debatable, but like a referee or umpire's decision we've built a system on that being the final assessment, and to learn to accept that.π
I thought the "racism" of Chauvin killing a black man was the crux of blm, rioting, kneeling, corporate virtue signalling etc. Happy to be wrong on that but I figured that was the impetus for the last 12 months of mayhem.
Ah, thought you meant in relation to tnis event and the trial specifically.
I am no expert on BLM matters, but I would note that it started well before Chauvin, back in 2013 when Trayvon Martin was murdered and that bloke got off (an example of the courts very much NOT getting it right IMO)
-
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
Do we need to settle the "argument" of whether Chauvin was racist? Why is that relevant?
Am I missing something here, how is it not? Every news article I saw flash up on the screen this morning was about the racial side of it. I thought it was a cop killing a suspected perp?
-
@bones said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
Do we need to settle the "argument" of whether Chauvin was racist? Why is that relevant?
Am I missing something here, how is it not? Every news article I saw flash up on the screen this morning was about the racial side of it. I thought it was a cop killing a suspected perp?
Surely we the courts judged him on whether he murdered or manslaughtered (yes, its word) a person, not a black person.
-
@bones said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
Do we need to settle the "argument" of whether Chauvin was racist? Why is that relevant?
Am I missing something here, how is it not? Every news article I saw flash up on the screen this morning was about the racial side of it. I thought it was a cop killing a suspected perp?
Itβs actually worth discussing. Did he do this because he was black? Or did he do this because he was bad police officer, and did the same to whites/asians/everyone else?
Can throw in that cops kill more white people each year than black too.
-
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
@bones said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
Do we need to settle the "argument" of whether Chauvin was racist? Why is that relevant?
Am I missing something here, how is it not? Every news article I saw flash up on the screen this morning was about the racial side of it. I thought it was a cop killing a suspected perp?
Surely we the courts judged him on whether he murdered or manslaughtered (yes, its word) a person, not a black person.
You'd hope so, but do we really think that?
I was just taken aback at the gym this morning (did I mention I work out) that every time I caught a TV screen, there was someone yapping on about racist this, racist that (at least that's what the subtitles said, maybe not verbatim).
-
@bones said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
@bones said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
Do we need to settle the "argument" of whether Chauvin was racist? Why is that relevant?
Am I missing something here, how is it not? Every news article I saw flash up on the screen this morning was about the racial side of it. I thought it was a cop killing a suspected perp?
Surely we the courts judged him on whether he murdered or manslaughtered (yes, its word) a person, not a black person.
You'd hope so, but do we really think that?
I was just taken aback at the gym this morning (did I mention I work out) that every time I caught a TV screen, there was someone yapping on about racist this, racist that (at least that's what the subtitles said, maybe not verbatim).
Dunno mate, who knows how the jury looked at it. I'd like to think the evidence of his actions were what convinced them and that the same conclusion would have been reached if he'd killed a white bloke. Maybe that's naive.
I certainly agree the media has gone to town on the racial angle. As have many of the protestors.
-
So what do we call a black cop ( or hispanic) that kills a black perp?
Data from Sam Harris indicates this is more prevalent than white on black. Definitely more black cops assault black perps.
So what's the story? Is police brutality the crux of the issue or racism?
Is it BLM or CLM? (criminals lives matter). -
@siam said in Black Lives Matter:
So justice is served, and Minneapolis can be riot free, right?
Something which I found interesting (which you may as well) is that apparently Minneapolis has had rioting issues in about 100 sq metres of the city. All the news I've been watching continuously shows Minneapolis in a complete state of unrest.
However, when you scratch the surface, it seems that it's only a tiny part of the city. Same as Portland.
It's still rioting of course, but I guess like when it happens in London, it's relatively easy to avoid.