-
@baron-silas-greenback said in US Politics:
@catogrande said in US Politics:
@baron-silas-greenback said in US Politics:
@catogrande said in US Politics:
@baron-silas-greenback said in US Politics:
@catogrande said in US Politics:
Whilst it's laughingly over emotive to use that term, it is still one heck of a lot of data. Or is that irrelevant?
1961 called and they would like their definition of a 'heck of a lot of data' back please granddad....
I hear Mueller also has footage of Trump using his horseless carriage to get to work.
Thank you for your understanding young man. However I'm pretty sure that quantity has not changed over time, certainly not since 1961. Of course the terminology of measurement has changed but that was not my point.
I was being kind. A terabyte of data is fuck all, especially in this context. The fact you think it is, shows how effective the CNN bullshit has been on some.
Just think about what they are talking about... russian influencing of social media.... 1 terabyte???? Jeez all that viral memes, vidoes, FB pages, comment trawling.. and they come up with 1 terabyte... sorry.. 1 trillion bytes.I was hoping you were being kind. I sort of understand that in the world of IT I terabyte is not that much but in non IT world how would that relate to say A4 pages of data?
Completely and utterly irrelevant. Considerng they were not collecting A4 pieces of paper. Unless those A4 pieces of paper are the binary of the data.
I could understand the irrelevancy of that measurement if the data collected is stuff like memes, audio and video or images. If it is transcript then I'd say it is quite relevant. Of course neither of us know what the data is...
-
@sapetyvi said in US Politics:
@catogrande Trillion letters for example, but I doubt they only gathered plain text. Most of it would have been voice, pictures, video etc.. which adds up to a terabyte very quickly. You could easily have a terabyte of movies and porn and still nothing to watch.
Thanks, I sort of understand that and hopefully conveyed that in my reply to the Baron.
-
@catogrande said in US Politics:
@baron-silas-greenback said in US Politics:
@catogrande said in US Politics:
@baron-silas-greenback said in US Politics:
@catogrande said in US Politics:
@baron-silas-greenback said in US Politics:
@catogrande said in US Politics:
Whilst it's laughingly over emotive to use that term, it is still one heck of a lot of data. Or is that irrelevant?
1961 called and they would like their definition of a 'heck of a lot of data' back please granddad....
I hear Mueller also has footage of Trump using his horseless carriage to get to work.
Thank you for your understanding young man. However I'm pretty sure that quantity has not changed over time, certainly not since 1961. Of course the terminology of measurement has changed but that was not my point.
I was being kind. A terabyte of data is fuck all, especially in this context. The fact you think it is, shows how effective the CNN bullshit has been on some.
Just think about what they are talking about... russian influencing of social media.... 1 terabyte???? Jeez all that viral memes, vidoes, FB pages, comment trawling.. and they come up with 1 terabyte... sorry.. 1 trillion bytes.I was hoping you were being kind. I sort of understand that in the world of IT I terabyte is not that much but in non IT world how would that relate to say A4 pages of data?
Completely and utterly irrelevant. Considerng they were not collecting A4 pieces of paper. Unless those A4 pieces of paper are the binary of the data.
I could understand the irrelevancy of that measurement if the data collected is stuff like memes, audio and video or images. If it is transcript then I'd say it is quite relevant. Of course neither of us know what the data is...
Zero chance of it being transcripts. Considering they indicted people and companies they thought would never show up in court.. and then got a shock when they did.... pesky Russians. And even more of a shock when they discovered one of the defendant companies didnt even exist when they were supposedly involved. Not tomention now Mueller s team is subject to discovery proceedings .... but they dont want to give those Russians charged any information, but have to once you indict.....Oops... What a clusterfuck.
-
-
Comical pathetic headline from the New York Times.
-
Trump went on one hell of an awesome twitter tirade this morning. But if he’s smart, he won’t want the witch-hunt to end. It should go through the mid-terms, because it’ll pull many conservatives to the polls. There are lots of Never-Trump conservatives (see: the Never-Trump National Review, the Trump-hating Weekly Standard) that have nothing but disdain for Trump, but are now viewing him in a sympathetic light and are so incensced at what Obama’s justice department did to start this scam and what the Dem cabal is doing right now to pull off this hoax that they’ll be turning out in droves to vote for GOP candidates and circle the wagons around his Supreme Court noms, etc.. If you haven’t been reading the scorching legal commentaries that Andrew McCarthy has been posting the last few weeks in the National Review, do yourself a favour.
-
A year and a half late, but thanks to Trump’s tweet this morning...
“Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein asked the Justice Department's inspector general Sunday to review whether there was improper politically motivated surveillance of the Trump campaign in 2016.
“Rosenstein made the request shortly after a tweet from President Trump saying that he would "officially" ask "that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes."
-
This poll has the Republicans in front in the generic ballot for 2018: Reuters Poll
Maybe its an outlier, but the trend line is not great for the Dems over the last month
-
@duluth said in US Politics:
This poll has the Republicans in front in the generic ballot for 2018: Reuters Poll
Maybe its an outlier, but the trend line is not great for the Dems over the last month
The trend is def in Trumps favour at the moment. Quite remarkable if he holds Congress. Would be a nuclear bomb in the swamp. The reaction would amazing
-
@duluth said in US Politics:
This poll has the Republicans in front in the generic ballot for 2018: Reuters Poll
Maybe its an outlier, but the trend line is not great for the Dems over the last month
I've read multiple times that all the Dems had to do was not act crazy for a few months and the blue wave would be a fact. Pity they couldn't even do that.
-
Dear God, this is funny. Could easily have been posted in the “Fake News” thread, or the “North Korea” thread, but I’ll stick it right here ‘cos the idiot American news media is the defacto opposition party.
Media Double Down After New York Times Gets Busted Peddling Fake News
There may have been a real White House briefing with real White House officials, but The New York Times couldn't be trusted to accurately summarize what the White House official said. And it wasn't on a minor point.
-
So a "comedian " calls Ivanka Trump a "Feckless fluffybunny" on TV... and her bosses do not much. Imagine if Michelle Obama was called that on Fox. .
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in US Politics:
So a "comedian " calls Ivanka Trump a "Feckless fluffybunny" on TV... and her bosses do not much. Imagine if Michelle Obama was called that on Fox. .
It wasn't as if it was a drunken twitter rant either. This was scripted, filmed and presumably approved by the head honchos at the network. It's a pathetic doublestandard. She epitomises those who claim they're all about love and harmony but that only applies to people who are completely in step with their views. Anyone else is fair game for the most vile abuse imaginable. Never about consistency or the principal, always always the side.
-
Economy continues to hum under Trump. Best EVER black unemployment numbers.
His detractors and panic mongers are looking more and more foolish. -
@rancid-schnitzel I feel somewhat dirty defending her, but there's a world of difference between calling someone a fluffybunny and choosing as Barr did, to use racism.
-
@antipodean said in US Politics:
@rancid-schnitzel I feel somewhat dirty defending her, but there's a world of difference between calling someone a fluffybunny and choosing as Barr did, to use racism.
I wasn't actually comparing what was said as such, but if you want racism check out Joy Reid. Oh that's right, her account was "hacked".
As usual Tim Blair hits the nail on the head:
In any case would you put money on Roseanne keeping her series if she'd called Michelle Obama a feckless cnut after posting a picture of herself hugging her daughter?
-
@antipodean said in US Politics:
@rancid-schnitzel I feel somewhat dirty defending her, but there's a world of difference between calling someone a fluffybunny and choosing as Barr did, to use racism.
Why?
I think both are bad. And that is ignoring the incestuous implications Bee also made... which takes it to a whole new level.I like the suggestion made that the recipient of the insult should decide if an apology is sufficient.
-
@rancid-schnitzel said in US Politics:
@antipodean said in US Politics:
@rancid-schnitzel I feel somewhat dirty defending her, but there's a world of difference between calling someone a fluffybunny and choosing as Barr did, to use racism.
I wasn't actually comparing what was said as such, but if you want racism check out Joy Reid. Oh that's right, her account was "hacked".
Sorry, I didn't mean to give the implication that you did. I've just seen it and your post reminded me of it.
As usual Tim Blair hits the nail on the head:
That just reflects poorly on MSNBC.
@baron-silas-greenback said in US Politics:
@antipodean said in US Politics:
@rancid-schnitzel I feel somewhat dirty defending her, but there's a world of difference between calling someone a fluffybunny and choosing as Barr did, to use racism.
Why?
Abusing someone on their character is different from making judgments about others on the basis of the way they look. One you have control over.
I think both are bad. And that is ignoring the incestuous implications Bee also made... which takes it to a whole new level.
I like the suggestion made that the recipient of the insult should decide if an apology is sufficient.
I don't. There's a good reason that we don't permit the victims of crime to determine the punishment. If individuals don't like the apology, they're welcome to seek civil redress as difficult as that is in the USA.
US Politics