Black Lives Matter
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in Black Lives Matter:
@Catogrande said in Black Lives Matter:
@Victor-Meldrew Livingstone, Livingstone, nobody and Corbyn. Not an impressive list.
So he's never successfully faced any serious opponents in 15 years of high-level politics? Right-o
Not what said. It’s politics so he’s always facing off, some serious, some not. I was merely replying to your point about 2 mayoral elections, the Tory leadership vote and the last GE. Yes you can only beat what is in front of you but also you can be measured against those you beat. He’s without doubt a political animal and hell bent on winning (sorry tautology there) otherwise why not put your hand up when Cameron resigned?
It’s funny and I do find myself being conflicted around Boris. I find him an engaging personality and a breath of fresh air after what has gone before but do I think he will be a good leader? I hope so, but I doubt it. I did vote Tory in the last GE but in all honesty I would have if it was still May there or even God forbid Rubber lips Gove. If I was able I probably would have voted Boris for the Tory leadership, though more in the absence of a viable alternative.
In the end, he is the PM and he is providing direction and I am all for this but I really think we’re in the mess we are because of a lot of ambition and arrogance from quite a few of our so called leaders.
Anyway, back to the point in question, who of any weight has he beaten?
-
@Catogrande said in Black Lives Matter:
Anyway, back to the point in question, who of any weight has he beaten?
The same weight of opponent that Blair, Thatcher, Wilson & McMillan beat?
At the end of the day, "Weight" is subjective, winning isn't.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Black Lives Matter:
@Rembrandt said in Black Lives Matter:
The narrative is falling to pieces.
https://streamable.com/v72hvxWhat did you infer from this please?
My take was that he disagreed but couldn't say as much.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in Black Lives Matter:
@Catogrande said in Black Lives Matter:
Anyway, back to the point in question, who of any weight has he beaten?
The same weight of opponent that Blair, Thatcher, Wilson & McMillan beat?
At the end of the day, "Weight" is subjective, winning isn't.
Ach! My friend, we will have to agree to disagree on this one I think.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Black Lives Matter:
@Rembrandt said in Black Lives Matter:
The narrative is falling to pieces.
https://streamable.com/v72hvxWhat did you infer from this please?
That MSM are now reporting more along the lines of a justified shooting.
-
@Catogrande said in Black Lives Matter:
@Crazy-Horse said in Black Lives Matter:
@Bones said in Black Lives Matter:
@Catogrande said in Black Lives Matter:
7 times. That is not justifiable
See I'm not convinced on that.
I'm sure 4 or 5 times seemed like overkill to someone once.. until they got severely harmed as they hadn't finished the perp off.
Spot on. Police are trained to fire until the threat no longer exists. If it takes seven shots, it takes seven shots.
I can understand that. Have you seen the footage? Assuming you have, would you have been happy if that officer had been under your command? I just don’t think anyone gets a free pass on this one.
I know this is a bit of a cop out, but I have no idea how I would be feeling. Videos very rarely tell the whole story.
-
According to the attorney for the Kenosha police union
- They had attempted to tase him twice and both times failed.
- He had put one of the other officers in a headlock when they were scuffling.
- He had a knife in his possession which the police repeatedly asked him to drop.
-
@Frank said in Black Lives Matter:
According to the attorney for the Kenosha police union
- They had attempted to tase him twice and both times failed.
- He had put one of the other officers in a headlock when they were scuffling.
- He had a knife in his possession which the police repeatedly asked him to drop.
This list of facts will have the BLM troublemakers up in arms that’s for sure
-
@canefan said in Black Lives Matter:
I found this article interesting. Unlike some posters here I only take a pretty outside view of American politics
If the Dems lose again they will only have themselves to blame. As detestable as I think Trump is, the dems can look back having failed to put up an attractive alternative that captures the imagination
I dunno, I think Kamala is kinda hot
-
I am wary of getting pulled down twitter/facebook rabbitholes but probably helpful to add some perspective as a person of color is the US. The content of the initial letter is nothing new in the US and many countries that do contain underpriviliged and undersestimated people. I am doubtful that it was written by a black professor but that claim will always give it a bigger push. The core of the argument is familiar, always slightly different, why do light skin blacks perform better than dark skin blacks, why do black women perform better than black men, the same things were heard on plantations, in Southern Africa why do coloreds perform better than African, or elsewhere why are Tutsis better than Hutus, why are Carribean american Blacks better than African-American blacks. The common thread is that many of these differences are minimal but have roots in oppression, and were perpetuated for the benefit a few. There are a long list of ways and reasons that there effects still manifest themselves and many books which cover that ground. Yes particularly in America there is opportunity for everyone, but even successful blacks , Robert Smith, Oprah Winfrey , Lebron James who laud hard work will bring light to the extreme inequality that makes the road very tough for any young person of color. The unequal opportunity starts at kindergarten, continues through school, continues in police interactions, the legal system the list is long. The struggles are not limited to socio-economic status though this is clearly a factor. Very instructive to hear the NBA players, coaches (Doc Rivers, ) GM (Masai Ujiri) opine on their feelings and experiences and one understands the fear , anxiety and frustration to be a black man in America. Particularly Doc Rivers talking about the talk every black family must have with their young sons.
The other notable point was the idea that "Black Lives Matter" is some kind of a political, party composed of anarchists and rioters a narrative that has been effective for Trump and co but a source of frustration for most supporters who are peaceful. At its core I dont think the statement could be clearer and simpler " We matter, our lives matter, see us, help us". On the other side I do love the mobilization and voting efforts initiated by NBA players and others , making voting difficult for black people is something that has happened for years and to make this more accessible and easier can be a game changer. For the record black voters pretty much brought Biden from the brink , so lets see what happens in November.
-
@DMX said in Black Lives Matter:
The other notable point was the idea that "Black Lives Matter" is some kind of a political, party composed of anarchists and rioters a narrative that has been effective for Trump and co but a source of frustration for most supporters who are peaceful. At its core I dont think the statement could be clearer and simpler " We matter, our lives matter, see us, help us".
Great post! But I have to disagree on that the message is clear. Much is done and said in the name of the movement and with no figurehead or centralized demands/policy it is incredibly murky exactly what the boundaries of the broader BLM movement are.
Ignore the supposedly fringe elements including property damage, talk of reparations and the 'disease of whiteness' philosophy and look at something as simple as Defund the Police. Surely that forms a core part of the BLM platform at this stage?
-
@Catogrande said in Black Lives Matter:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Black Lives Matter:
@Catogrande said in Black Lives Matter:
Anyway, back to the point in question, who of any weight has he beaten?
The same weight of opponent that Blair, Thatcher, Wilson & McMillan beat?
At the end of the day, "Weight" is subjective, winning isn't.
Ach! My friend, we will have to agree to disagree on this one I think.
Well, to be fair, time will tell if either of us are right....
-
@rotated said in Black Lives Matter:
Ignore the supposedly fringe elements including property damage, talk of reparations and the 'disease of whiteness' philosophy and look at something as simple as Defund the Police. Surely that forms a core part of the BLM platform at this stage?
My personal opinion is that it is not a core but its a great narrative for the haters. I also think its a misnomer to talk in terms of BLM leadership or a BLM platform. The people who register the name or website have the same ownership over it as Jeff Bezos does the Amazon rainforest or Tim cook does over apples. Most people don't even know who these so called leaders are. If you ask anyone in detail what Defund the Police even means I reckon you get a dozens of answers. Most reasonable people do not say that there should be no police. I have heard of taking social work duties and funding away from the police (seems reasonable). I have heard things like the police should act more like a community policing organization and less like a military unit. I have heard that reform of the current structure of accountability is needed. I don't know what the best solutions are but a fair minded debate seems in order.
If the movement has pushed corporations and people to recognize unconscious biases, if it pushes the country to re-examine policing, education and criminal justice, if it makes it easier to vote, I believe these would be steps towards a positive outcome.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in Black Lives Matter:
@voodoo said in Black Lives Matter:
What I still haven't really seen from the athletes and any other figures of prominence, is a clear direction in terms of what they want to see. Protest is one thing, but what's the end goal? It can't just be "justice". What does "reform" look like? Surely not just defunding the police?
Ask them some searching questions and they probably just don't have a clue. They see something wrong and just want to do something to show their concern - many to virtue-signal, others to make themselves more bankable to their target market.
BLM leaders do know what they want - pretty much revolution and tearing down the capitalist state.
I think this is a little harsh. One of the main reasons for the NBA shutdown the other day was for players to come together and work out next steps, how to take the movement beyond protest and into action.
This seems to initially involve putting more pressure on ownership, as well as things like opening up team arenas as polling places on election day.
I think many players are mindful that this needs to go beyond wearing BLM t-shirts when they are warming up.
-
@DMX . In order to believe that the core part of the BLM message is good you then have to ignore 30+ murders since George Floyd, hundreds of businesses destroyed, billions of dollars of damage, hundreds of assaults, all by folk screaming (and with graffiti) 'Black lives matter'. You'll have to ignore the supposed BLM leaders, ignore the official website, their official twitter, and rants from verified twitter supporters and promoters. You then also have to ignore crime statistics, you have to be wilfully blind to what happens in the real world when a violent felon of any skin tone resists arrest and you have to ignore video and witness testimony of the majority of these well publicised incidents where a black person dies at the hands of police..you then also have to assume that the exact same incidents with white victims just don't happen (again despite video evidence to the contrary). You also have to ignore studies that show the average person living in a black neighbourhood want the same if not an increase police presence.
I agree that Black lives matter, but its like saying 'puppies are cute!' of course its true! But what this movement seems to be increasingly showing is that its not 'Black lives' that matter its 'Black criminals lives matter' and their victims, who are overwhelmingly black, well according to this movement their lives aren't worth a damn.
But I am open to seeing another side of this, can you point me to where this moderate BLM message exists? Who is pushing it? Are they calling out this supposed fringe element? What makes their message the authentic BLM message? I'd like to see what evidence their message is based upon.
-
@DMX said in Black Lives Matter:
@rotated said in Black Lives Matter:
Ignore the supposedly fringe elements including property damage, talk of reparations and the 'disease of whiteness' philosophy and look at something as simple as Defund the Police. Surely that forms a core part of the BLM platform at this stage?
My personal opinion is that it is not a core but its a great narrative for the haters. I also think its a misnomer to talk in terms of BLM leadership or a BLM platform. The people who register the name or website have the same ownership over it as Jeff Bezos does the Amazon rainforest or Tim cook does over apples. Most people don't even know who these so called leaders are. If you ask anyone in detail what Defund the Police even means I reckon you get a dozens of answers. Most reasonable people do not say that there should be no police. I have heard of taking social work duties and funding away from the police (seems reasonable). I have heard things like the police should act more like a community policing organization and less like a military unit. I have heard that reform of the current structure of accountability is needed. I don't know what the best solutions are but a fair minded debate seems in order.
If the movement has pushed corporations and people to recognize unconscious biases, if it pushes the country to re-examine policing, education and criminal justice, if it makes it easier to vote, I believe these would be steps towards a positive outcome.
Amen brother!
Never mind the mild irritation of those innocents who have lost their lives and livelihoods - their fault for not pushing primary school reform.
I said the same thing when ISIS took care of the uncomfortable seats in the Manchester arena. If not for their positive influence people wouldn't have new seats to watch pop concerts. Similarly without Tarrant, we'd still have assault rifles shooting up the community on a weekly basis.
Long live blm and their 81 day peaceful "protests".
Finally, someone that can see the wood for the trees.
Gotta go, I've got to submit my unconscious bias phd before the deadline that doesn't apply to me because I'm " coloured". Apparently I'm in for some of the $300 million that's been donated to no one in particular or maybe a website domain holder.
No, dmx, I don't think you've thought through you argument particularly well...
-
@Siam said in Black Lives Matter:
@DMX said in Black Lives Matter:
@rotated said in Black Lives Matter:
Ignore the supposedly fringe elements including property damage, talk of reparations and the 'disease of whiteness' philosophy and look at something as simple as Defund the Police. Surely that forms a core part of the BLM platform at this stage?
My personal opinion is that it is not a core but its a great narrative for the haters. I also think its a misnomer to talk in terms of BLM leadership or a BLM platform. The people who register the name or website have the same ownership over it as Jeff Bezos does the Amazon rainforest or Tim cook does over apples. Most people don't even know who these so called leaders are. If you ask anyone in detail what Defund the Police even means I reckon you get a dozens of answers. Most reasonable people do not say that there should be no police. I have heard of taking social work duties and funding away from the police (seems reasonable). I have heard things like the police should act more like a community policing organization and less like a military unit. I have heard that reform of the current structure of accountability is needed. I don't know what the best solutions are but a fair minded debate seems in order.
If the movement has pushed corporations and people to recognize unconscious biases, if it pushes the country to re-examine policing, education and criminal justice, if it makes it easier to vote, I believe these would be steps towards a positive outcome.
Amen brother!
Never mind the mild irritation of those innocents who have lost their lives and livelihoods - their fault for not pushing primary school reform.
I said the same thing when ISIS took care of the uncomfortable seats in the Manchester arena. If not for their positive influence people wouldn't have new seats to watch pop concerts. Similarly without Tarrant, we'd still have assault rifles shooting up the community on a weekly basis.
Jesus, this is pretty rough. I know the BLM protests have some rough edges but it's clearly touched a nerve right across the country and may well yield some positive change. But apparently from behind a keyboard in Aus/NZ you can compare it to ISIS. Whatever floats your boat I suppose.